Skip to main content
Log in

Preparation and flow cytometric analysis of metaphase chromosomes of tomato

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A procedure for the preparation of tomato chromosome suspensions suitable for flow cytometric analysis is described. Rapidly growing cell suspension cultures of Lycopersicon esculentum cv VFNT cherry and L. pennellii LA716 were treated with colchicine to enrich for metaphase chromosomes. Metaphase indices between 20 and 35% were routinely obtained when cultures were exposed to 0.1% colchicine for 15–18 h after 2 days of subculture. Mitotic cells were isolated by brief treatment with cell wall digesting enzymes in a medium with low osmolarity (∼325 mOsm/kg of H52O). The low osmolarity medium was needed to avoid the chromosome clumping and decondensation seen in standard media. Suspensions of intact chromosomes were prepared by lysing swollen protoplasts in various buffers (MgSO4, polyamines, hexylene glycol, or KCl-propidium iodide) similar in contents to the buffers used to isolate mammalian chromosomes. For univariate flow cytometric analysis, chromosome suspensions were stained with a fluorescent DNA-binding stain (propidium iodide, Hoechst 33258, mithramycin, or chromomycin A3) and analyzed using an EPICS flow cytometer (Profile Analyzer or 753). Peaks for the chromosomes, chromatids, clumps of chromosomes, nuclei, and fluorescent debris were seen on a histogram of log of fluorescence intensity, and were confirmed by microscopic examination of the objects collected by flow-sorting. Chromosome suspensions prepared in MgSO4 buffer have the highest frequency of intact chromosomes and the least fluorescent cellular debris. Peaks similar to theoretical univariate flow karyotypes of tomato chromosomes were seen on the observed univariate flow karyotypes, but were not as well resolved. Bivariate flow analysis of tomato chromosome suspension using double-stain combination, Hoechst 33258 and chromomycin A3, and two laser beams showed better resolution of some chromosomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buys C, Koerts T, Aten J (1982) Well identifiable human chromosomes isolated from mitotic fibroblasts by a new method. Hum Genet 61:157–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Conia J, Bergounioux C, Perennes C, Muller P, Brown S, Gadal P (1987) Flow cytometric analysis and sorting of plant chromosomes from Petunia hybrida protoplasts. Cytometry 8:500–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Conia J, Bergounioux C, Brown S, Perennes C, Gadal P (1988) Caryotype en flux biparamétrique de Petunia hybrida. Tri du chromosome numéro I. CR Acad Sci Paris 307:609–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Conia J, Muller P, Brown S, Bergounioux C, Gadal P (1989) Monoparametric models of flow cytometric karyotypes with spreadsheet software. Theor Appl Genet 77:295–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Cram LS, Bartholdi MF, Ray FA, Cassidy M, Kraemer PM (1989) Univariate flow karyotype analysis. In: Grey JW (ed) Flow cytogenetics. Academic Press, London New York, pp 113–136

    Google Scholar 

  • DuPont FM, Staraci LC, Chou B, Thomas BR, Williams BG, Mudd JB (1985) Effect of chilling upon cell cultures of tomato. Plant Physiol 77:64–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Engh G van den, Trask B, Cram S, Bartholdi M (1984) Preparation of chromosome suspensions for flow cytometry. Cytometry 5:108–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray JW, Langlois RG (1986) Chromosome classification and purification using flow cytometry and sorting. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 15:195–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Griesbach RJ, Malmberg RL, Carlson PS (1982) An improved technique for the isolation of higher plant chromosomes. Plant Sci Lett 24:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadlaczky G, Bisztray G, Praznovszky T, Dudits D (1983) Mass isolation of plant chromosomes and nuclei. Plant 157:278–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN (1982) Staining methods for protoplasts and cells. In: Wetter LR, Constabel F (eds) Plant tissue culture methods. National Research Council, Saskatoon, Canada, pp 67–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss T, Kis M, Abel S, Solymosy F (1988) Nucleotide sequence of the 17S–25S spacer region from tomato rDNA. Nucleic Acids Res 16:7179

    Google Scholar 

  • Laat AMM de, Blaas J (1984) Flow-cytometric characterization and sorting of plant chromosomes. Theor Appl Genet 67:463–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapitan NLV, Ganal MW, Tanksley SD (1989) Generation of tomato somatic chromosome karyotype based on in situ hybridization of TGR I satellite repeat. Genome 32:992–998

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebo RV (1989) Gene mapping strategies and bivariate flow cytogenetics. In: Grey JW (ed) Flow cytogenetics. Academic Press, London New York, pp 225–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozes C (1989) Cell culture for chromosome isolation. In: Grey JW (ed) Flow cytogenetics. Academic Press, London New York, pp 35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg RL, Griesbach RJ (1980) The isolation of mitotic and meiotic chromosomes from plant protoplasts. Plant Sci Lett 17:141–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews BF (1983) Isolation of mitotic chromosomes from partially synchronized carrot (D. carota) cell suspension cultures. Plant Sci Lett 31:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Messeguer R, Ganal MW, Steffens JC, Tanksley SD (1991) Characterization of the level, target sites, and inheritance of cytosine methylation of tomato nuclear DNA. Plant Mol Biol (in press)

  • Minoshima S, Kawasaki K, Fukuyama R, Maekawa M, Kudoh J, Simizu N (1990) Isolation of giant DNA fragments from flow-sorted human chromosomes. Cytometry 11:538–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitsch JP (1969) Experimental androgenesis in Nicotiana. Phytomorphology 19:389–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry KL, Palukaitis P (1990) Transcription of tomato ribosomal DNA and the organization of the intergeneric spacer. Mol Gen Genet 221:102–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeder M, Arumuganathan K, Lapitan NL, Tanksley SD, Earle ED (1989) A rapid method for large-scale isolation of tomato metaphase chromosomes. In: Galling G (ed) Proc Braunschweig Sym Appl Mol Biol, pp 137–140

  • Sillar R, Young BD (1981) A new method for the preparation of metaphase chromosomes for flow analysis. J Histochem Cytochem 281:74–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan MMC, Rietveld EM, Marrewijk GAM van, Kool AD (1987) Regeneration of leaf mesophyll protoplasts of tomato cultivars (L. esculentum): factors important for efficient protoplast culture and plant regeneration. Plant Cell Rep 6:172–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Trask B (1989) Chromosome isolation. In: Grey JW (ed) Flow cytogenetics. Academic Press, London New York, pp 43–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dilla MA, Deaven LL (1990) Construction of gene libraries for each human chromosome. Cytometry 11:208–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray W, Stubblefield E (1970) A new method for the rapid isolation of chromosomes, mitotic apparatus, or nuclei from mammalian fibroblasts at near neutral pH. Exp Cell Res 59:469–478

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by P. Maliga

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arumuganathan, K., Slattery, J.P., Tanksley, S.D. et al. Preparation and flow cytometric analysis of metaphase chromosomes of tomato. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 82, 101–111 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231283

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231283

Key words

Navigation