Skip to main content
Log in

Bedeutung der N- und α-Methylierung für die Affinität von Brenzcatechinaminen zu den adrenergischen Receptoren

Influence of N- and α-methylation on the affinity of catecholamines to the adrenergic receptors

  • Published:
Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Archiv für Pharmakologie und experimentelle Pathologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

1. N-methylation of dopamine yielding epinine means potentiation of the α-adrenergic pressor action in the cat. It is only N-methylation which renders dopamine to a direct acting β-sympathomimetic amine: the positive inotropic effect of epinine on the isolated electrically driven guinea pig auricle remained uninfluenced by pretreatment of the animals with reserpine, whereas the dose-response curve of dopamine was shifted to the right.

The blood pressure lowering effect of epinine after phenoxybenzamine was—in contrast to that of dopamine—abolished by pronethalol.—N-methylation of noradrenaline doubled the affinity for the β-receptors of the heart.

2. Also by α-methylation dopamine gains affinity to the adrenergic β-receptors (heart and vessels): d-α-methyldopamine, an exclusively directly acting catecholamine, had a 40 times stronger inotropic action than dopamine on reserpinized auricles; the action of l-α-methyldopamine, a mainly indirectly acting amine, was only 4 times stronger than dopamine.

α-methylnoradrenaline, although having the same inotropic activity as noradrenaline, had a 10 times stronger depressor action than noradrenaline in the cat pretreated with phenoxybenzamine.

By α-methylation, the α-adrenergic pressor effect of dopamine as well as that of noradrenaline was enhanced only in the range of lower doses since the dose-response curves of the α-methylated compounds were generally less steep than those of the non-methylated catecholamines, indicating a lower “intrinsic activity” of the α-methylated derivatives.

3. The N- and α-methylated catecholamines α-methylepinine and α-methyladrenaline resp. were blood pressure lowering agents per se, because both methylgroups additively enhanced the affinity to the vascular β-receptors. α-methylepinine was the most potent β-sympathomimetic on the heart in the “dopamine series” (dopamine < d-α-methyldopamine ≈ epinine < dl-α-methylepinine). However, in the “noradrenaline series” the twofold methylated compound α-methyladrenaline had the lowest positive inotropic action (d(−)-adrenaline > d(−)-noradrenaline ≈ (−)erythro-α-methylnoradrenaline > (−) erythro-α-methyladrenaline).

4. From the results the following conclusions are drawn: The N- as well as the α-methyl-group exerts and “+I-effect” on the ammonium group. Thereby, protonation will be increased which leads to an enhanced affinity of the resp. catecholamine to the adrenergic α- and β-receptor. Since the α-CH3 group—dependant upon its steric configuration—also causes a steric hindrance at the receptor site, the increase in affinity due to the +I-effect is partially neutralized. By that the lower intrinsic affinity of the α-methylated compounds as indicated by the different slope of their pressor dose-response curves, is also readily explained. Furtheron it is intelligible why α-methylation enhanced the β-adrenergic activity in the less potent “dopamine series” (preponderance of the “+I-effect”), whereas it lowered the affinity to the cardiac β-receptors in the “noradrenaline series” (preponderance of the steric hindrance).

5. Although α-methyladrenaline was the least potent β-sympathomimetic of the “noradrenaline series” in the guinea pig heart, it was the most potent compound in lowering the cat's blood pressure. Therefore, it seems to be questionable whether the cardiac and the vascular β-receptors and/or the mechanisms by which they induce the pharmacodynamic actions are identical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Ariëns, E. J.: Molecular pharmacology. New York, London: Academic Press 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Wirkung und Wirkungsmechanismus von Catecholaminen und ihren Derivaten. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmak. exp. Path. 257, 118–141 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, and A. M. Simonis: The pharmacology of catecholamines and their derivatives. Part I: Relationship between structure and activity especially as far as the vascular system is concerned. Arzneimittel-Forsch. 13, 541–546 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Belleau, B.: Steric effects in catecholamine interactions with enzymes and receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 18, 131–140 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrodi, H., H. Persson, A. Carlsson, and J. Roberts: A new series of substances which block the adrenergic β-receptors. J. med. Chem. 6, 751–755 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, M. D., and M. J. Rand: A hypothesis for the mode of action of α-methyldopa in relieving hypertension. J. Pharm. (Lond.) 15, 221–224 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deripe, D. R. van, and N. C. Moran: Comparison of cardiac and vasodilator adrenergic blocking activity of DCI and four analogs. Fed. Proc. 24, 712 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eble, J. N.: A proposed mechanism for the depressor effect of dopamine in the anesthetized dog. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 145, 64–70 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlij, D., R. Cetrangolo, and R. Valadez: Adrenotropic receptors in the frog. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 149, 65–70 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, J., A. Malafaya-Baptista, and W. Osswald: Effects of pronethalol on the cardiovascular actions of catecholamines during blockade by phenoxybenzamine. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 27, 459–467 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobecker, H., P. Holtz u. H. K. Müller: Die Wirkung von α-Methyldopa und Dopa auf den Brenzcatechinamingehalt des Herzens, der Nebennieren und der Haut des Frosches sowie auf die Melanophoren der Froschhaut. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmak. exp. Path. 255, 474–490 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, A., and R. F. Furchgott: The effects of various drugs on calcium exchange in the isolated guinea-pig left auricle. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 145, 162–172 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefely, W., H. Thoenen u. A. Hürlimann: Qualitativ und quantitativ unterschiedliche Wirkungen der α-Methyldopa-Vorbehandlung an Katzen je nach Dosierungsschema. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmak. exp. Path. 257, 25–26 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Himwich, W. A., and S. N. Glisson: Effects of haloperidol on the caudate nucleus. Fed. Proc. 26, 506 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz, P.: Über die Wirkung von Cholinestern und biogenen Aminen am isolierten Vorhof des Herzens. Acta neuroveg. (Wien) 21, 445–460 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— u. K. Stock: Über die Beeinflussung der Wirkungen sympathicomimetischer Amine durch Cocain und Reserpin. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 239, 14–28 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, u. D. Palm: Brenzcatechinamine und andere sympathicomimetische Amine (Biosynthese und Inaktivierung, Freisetzung und Wirkung). Ergebn. Physiol. 58, 1–580 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— u. E. Westermann: Über die Blutdruckwirkung des Dopamins. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 246, 133–146 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornykiewicz, O.: Dopamine (3-hydroxytyramine) and brain function. Pharmacol. Rev. 18, 925–964 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lands, A. M., G. E. Groblewski, and T. G. Brown jr.: Comparison of the action of isoproterenol and several related compounds on blood pressure, heart and bronchioles. Arch. int. Pharmacodyn. 161, 68–75 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, and J. W. Howard: A comparative study of the effects of 1-arterenol, epinephrine and isopropylarterenol on the heart. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 106, 65–76 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langeneckert, W., D. Palm u. P. Holtz: Sympathicomimetische Wirksamkeit von Papaverinderivaten. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 257, 304 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Largy, C. de, A. D. M. Greenfield, R. L. McCorry, and R. F. Whelan: The effects of intravenous infusion of mixtures of I-adrenaline and I-noradrenaline on the human subject. Clin. Sci. 9, 71–78 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, B.: The adrenergic blocking activity of N-tert.-butylmethoxamine (Butoxamine). J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 151, 413–422 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundholm, L.: The mechanism of the vasodilator effect of adrenaline. Acta physiol. scand. 39 (suppl. 133) 1–156 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manna, A. la, P. Pratesi, V. Ghislandi e U. Conte: La configurazione ottica delle eritro-3,4-diossinorefedrine. Il Farmaco XXII, 81–89 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. H., and L. I. Goldberg: Analysis of the cardiovascular effects of dopamine in the dog. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 140, 60–66 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, N. C.: Pharmacological characterization of adrenergic receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 18, 503–512 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Muscholl, E., u. E. Sprenger: Vergleichende Untersuchung der Blutdruckwirkung, Aufnahme und Speicherung von Dihydroxyephedrin (α-Methyladrenalin) und Dihydroxypseudoephedrin. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmak. exp. Path. 254, 109–124 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, M., J. W. Henry, and G. M. Nomaguchi: Blockade of responses to epinephrine and norepinephrine by dibenamine congeners. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 107, 300–309 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, and G. M. Nomaguchi: Responses to sympathomimetic amines after dibenamine blockade. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 107, 284–299 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm, D., W. Langeneckert u. P. Holtz: Beziehungen zwischen chemischer Konstitution substituierter Dopaminderivate und ihrer Affinität zu den adrenergischen Receptoren. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmak. exp. Path. 255, 56–57 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratesi, P., and E. Grana: Structure and activity at adrenergic receptors of catecholamines and certain related compounds. In: Adv. Drug Research, Vol. 2, eds. N. J. Harper and A. B. Simmonds, pp. 127–142. London and New York: Academic Press 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossum, J. M. van: Different types of sympathomimetic α-receptors. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 17, 202–216 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— The significance of dopamine-receptor blockade for the mechanism of action of neuroleptic drugs. Arch. int. Pharmacodyn. 160, 492–494 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaumann, O.: Über Oxy-Ephedrine. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 160, 127–176 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Zur Pharmakologie der optischen Isomeren des 3,4-Dioxy-nor-Ephedrins (Corbasil). Med. u. Chem. 3, 383–392 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schümann, H. J.: Zur Pharmakologie des Arterenols und Adrenalins. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 209, 340–349 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. W., and G. A. Robison: The role of cyclic-3′,5′-AMP in responses to catecholamines and other hormones. Pharmacol. Rev. 18, 145–161 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Triggle, D. J.: 2-Halogenoethylamines and receptor analysis. Adv. Drug Research, Vol. 2, eds. N. J. Harper and A. B. Simmonds, pp. 173–189. London and New York: Academic Press 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varma, D. R.: Antihypertensive effect of methyldopa in metacorticoid immuno-sympathectomized rats. J. Pharm. (Lond.) 19, 61–62 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • West, G. B.: Quantitative studies of adrenaline and noradrenaline. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 106, 418–425 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. R.: Kinetic studies of epinephrine effects in the perfused rat heart. Pharmacol. Rev. 18, 205–210 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Ausgeführt mit Unterstützung der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft.

Über einen Teil der Ergebnisse wurde auf der 7. Frühjahrstagung der Deutschen Pharmakologischen Gesellschaft in Mainz, 24.–27. April 1966, berichtet (Palm, Langeneckert u. Holtz, 1966).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palm, D., Langeneckert, W. & Holtz, P. Bedeutung der N- und α-Methylierung für die Affinität von Brenzcatechinaminen zu den adrenergischen Receptoren. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmak. u. Exp. Path. 258, 128–149 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00535788

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00535788

Key-Words

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation