Summary
1. N-methylation of dopamine yielding epinine means potentiation of the α-adrenergic pressor action in the cat. It is only N-methylation which renders dopamine to a direct acting β-sympathomimetic amine: the positive inotropic effect of epinine on the isolated electrically driven guinea pig auricle remained uninfluenced by pretreatment of the animals with reserpine, whereas the dose-response curve of dopamine was shifted to the right.
The blood pressure lowering effect of epinine after phenoxybenzamine was—in contrast to that of dopamine—abolished by pronethalol.—N-methylation of noradrenaline doubled the affinity for the β-receptors of the heart.
2. Also by α-methylation dopamine gains affinity to the adrenergic β-receptors (heart and vessels): d-α-methyldopamine, an exclusively directly acting catecholamine, had a 40 times stronger inotropic action than dopamine on reserpinized auricles; the action of l-α-methyldopamine, a mainly indirectly acting amine, was only 4 times stronger than dopamine.
α-methylnoradrenaline, although having the same inotropic activity as noradrenaline, had a 10 times stronger depressor action than noradrenaline in the cat pretreated with phenoxybenzamine.
By α-methylation, the α-adrenergic pressor effect of dopamine as well as that of noradrenaline was enhanced only in the range of lower doses since the dose-response curves of the α-methylated compounds were generally less steep than those of the non-methylated catecholamines, indicating a lower “intrinsic activity” of the α-methylated derivatives.
3. The N- and α-methylated catecholamines α-methylepinine and α-methyladrenaline resp. were blood pressure lowering agents per se, because both methylgroups additively enhanced the affinity to the vascular β-receptors. α-methylepinine was the most potent β-sympathomimetic on the heart in the “dopamine series” (dopamine < d-α-methyldopamine ≈ epinine < dl-α-methylepinine). However, in the “noradrenaline series” the twofold methylated compound α-methyladrenaline had the lowest positive inotropic action (d(−)-adrenaline > d(−)-noradrenaline ≈ (−)erythro-α-methylnoradrenaline > (−) erythro-α-methyladrenaline).
4. From the results the following conclusions are drawn: The N- as well as the α-methyl-group exerts and “+I-effect” on the ammonium group. Thereby, protonation will be increased which leads to an enhanced affinity of the resp. catecholamine to the adrenergic α- and β-receptor. Since the α-CH3 group—dependant upon its steric configuration—also causes a steric hindrance at the receptor site, the increase in affinity due to the +I-effect is partially neutralized. By that the lower intrinsic affinity of the α-methylated compounds as indicated by the different slope of their pressor dose-response curves, is also readily explained. Furtheron it is intelligible why α-methylation enhanced the β-adrenergic activity in the less potent “dopamine series” (preponderance of the “+I-effect”), whereas it lowered the affinity to the cardiac β-receptors in the “noradrenaline series” (preponderance of the steric hindrance).
5. Although α-methyladrenaline was the least potent β-sympathomimetic of the “noradrenaline series” in the guinea pig heart, it was the most potent compound in lowering the cat's blood pressure. Therefore, it seems to be questionable whether the cardiac and the vascular β-receptors and/or the mechanisms by which they induce the pharmacodynamic actions are identical.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Ariëns, E. J.: Molecular pharmacology. New York, London: Academic Press 1964.
—— Wirkung und Wirkungsmechanismus von Catecholaminen und ihren Derivaten. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmak. exp. Path. 257, 118–141 (1967).
——, and A. M. Simonis: The pharmacology of catecholamines and their derivatives. Part I: Relationship between structure and activity especially as far as the vascular system is concerned. Arzneimittel-Forsch. 13, 541–546 (1963).
Belleau, B.: Steric effects in catecholamine interactions with enzymes and receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 18, 131–140 (1966).
Corrodi, H., H. Persson, A. Carlsson, and J. Roberts: A new series of substances which block the adrenergic β-receptors. J. med. Chem. 6, 751–755 (1963).
Day, M. D., and M. J. Rand: A hypothesis for the mode of action of α-methyldopa in relieving hypertension. J. Pharm. (Lond.) 15, 221–224 (1963).
Deripe, D. R. van, and N. C. Moran: Comparison of cardiac and vasodilator adrenergic blocking activity of DCI and four analogs. Fed. Proc. 24, 712 (1965).
Eble, J. N.: A proposed mechanism for the depressor effect of dopamine in the anesthetized dog. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 145, 64–70 (1964).
Erlij, D., R. Cetrangolo, and R. Valadez: Adrenotropic receptors in the frog. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 149, 65–70 (1965).
Garrett, J., A. Malafaya-Baptista, and W. Osswald: Effects of pronethalol on the cardiovascular actions of catecholamines during blockade by phenoxybenzamine. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 27, 459–467 (1966).
Grobecker, H., P. Holtz u. H. K. Müller: Die Wirkung von α-Methyldopa und Dopa auf den Brenzcatechinamingehalt des Herzens, der Nebennieren und der Haut des Frosches sowie auf die Melanophoren der Froschhaut. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmak. exp. Path. 255, 474–490 (1966).
Grossman, A., and R. F. Furchgott: The effects of various drugs on calcium exchange in the isolated guinea-pig left auricle. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 145, 162–172 (1964).
Haefely, W., H. Thoenen u. A. Hürlimann: Qualitativ und quantitativ unterschiedliche Wirkungen der α-Methyldopa-Vorbehandlung an Katzen je nach Dosierungsschema. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmak. exp. Path. 257, 25–26 (1967).
Himwich, W. A., and S. N. Glisson: Effects of haloperidol on the caudate nucleus. Fed. Proc. 26, 506 (1967).
Holtz, P.: Über die Wirkung von Cholinestern und biogenen Aminen am isolierten Vorhof des Herzens. Acta neuroveg. (Wien) 21, 445–460 (1960).
—— u. K. Stock: Über die Beeinflussung der Wirkungen sympathicomimetischer Amine durch Cocain und Reserpin. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 239, 14–28 (1960).
——, u. D. Palm: Brenzcatechinamine und andere sympathicomimetische Amine (Biosynthese und Inaktivierung, Freisetzung und Wirkung). Ergebn. Physiol. 58, 1–580 (1966).
—— u. E. Westermann: Über die Blutdruckwirkung des Dopamins. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 246, 133–146 (1963).
Hornykiewicz, O.: Dopamine (3-hydroxytyramine) and brain function. Pharmacol. Rev. 18, 925–964 (1966).
Lands, A. M., G. E. Groblewski, and T. G. Brown jr.: Comparison of the action of isoproterenol and several related compounds on blood pressure, heart and bronchioles. Arch. int. Pharmacodyn. 161, 68–75 (1966).
——, and J. W. Howard: A comparative study of the effects of 1-arterenol, epinephrine and isopropylarterenol on the heart. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 106, 65–76 (1952).
Langeneckert, W., D. Palm u. P. Holtz: Sympathicomimetische Wirksamkeit von Papaverinderivaten. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 257, 304 (1967).
Largy, C. de, A. D. M. Greenfield, R. L. McCorry, and R. F. Whelan: The effects of intravenous infusion of mixtures of I-adrenaline and I-noradrenaline on the human subject. Clin. Sci. 9, 71–78 (1950).
Levy, B.: The adrenergic blocking activity of N-tert.-butylmethoxamine (Butoxamine). J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 151, 413–422 (1966).
Lundholm, L.: The mechanism of the vasodilator effect of adrenaline. Acta physiol. scand. 39 (suppl. 133) 1–156 (1956).
Manna, A. la, P. Pratesi, V. Ghislandi e U. Conte: La configurazione ottica delle eritro-3,4-diossinorefedrine. Il Farmaco XXII, 81–89 (1967).
McDonald, R. H., and L. I. Goldberg: Analysis of the cardiovascular effects of dopamine in the dog. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 140, 60–66 (1963).
Moran, N. C.: Pharmacological characterization of adrenergic receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 18, 503–512 (1966).
Muscholl, E., u. E. Sprenger: Vergleichende Untersuchung der Blutdruckwirkung, Aufnahme und Speicherung von Dihydroxyephedrin (α-Methyladrenalin) und Dihydroxypseudoephedrin. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmak. exp. Path. 254, 109–124 (1966).
Nickerson, M., J. W. Henry, and G. M. Nomaguchi: Blockade of responses to epinephrine and norepinephrine by dibenamine congeners. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 107, 300–309 (1953).
——, and G. M. Nomaguchi: Responses to sympathomimetic amines after dibenamine blockade. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 107, 284–299 (1953).
Palm, D., W. Langeneckert u. P. Holtz: Beziehungen zwischen chemischer Konstitution substituierter Dopaminderivate und ihrer Affinität zu den adrenergischen Receptoren. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmak. exp. Path. 255, 56–57 (1966).
Pratesi, P., and E. Grana: Structure and activity at adrenergic receptors of catecholamines and certain related compounds. In: Adv. Drug Research, Vol. 2, eds. N. J. Harper and A. B. Simmonds, pp. 127–142. London and New York: Academic Press 1965.
Rossum, J. M. van: Different types of sympathomimetic α-receptors. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 17, 202–216 (1965).
—— The significance of dopamine-receptor blockade for the mechanism of action of neuroleptic drugs. Arch. int. Pharmacodyn. 160, 492–494 (1966).
Schaumann, O.: Über Oxy-Ephedrine. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 160, 127–176 (1931).
—— Zur Pharmakologie der optischen Isomeren des 3,4-Dioxy-nor-Ephedrins (Corbasil). Med. u. Chem. 3, 383–392 (1936).
Schümann, H. J.: Zur Pharmakologie des Arterenols und Adrenalins. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 209, 340–349 (1950).
Sutherland, E. W., and G. A. Robison: The role of cyclic-3′,5′-AMP in responses to catecholamines and other hormones. Pharmacol. Rev. 18, 145–161 (1966).
Triggle, D. J.: 2-Halogenoethylamines and receptor analysis. Adv. Drug Research, Vol. 2, eds. N. J. Harper and A. B. Simmonds, pp. 173–189. London and New York: Academic Press 1965.
Varma, D. R.: Antihypertensive effect of methyldopa in metacorticoid immuno-sympathectomized rats. J. Pharm. (Lond.) 19, 61–62 (1967).
West, G. B.: Quantitative studies of adrenaline and noradrenaline. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 106, 418–425 (1947).
Williamson, J. R.: Kinetic studies of epinephrine effects in the perfused rat heart. Pharmacol. Rev. 18, 205–210 (1966).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Ausgeführt mit Unterstützung der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft.
Über einen Teil der Ergebnisse wurde auf der 7. Frühjahrstagung der Deutschen Pharmakologischen Gesellschaft in Mainz, 24.–27. April 1966, berichtet (Palm, Langeneckert u. Holtz, 1966).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palm, D., Langeneckert, W. & Holtz, P. Bedeutung der N- und α-Methylierung für die Affinität von Brenzcatechinaminen zu den adrenergischen Receptoren. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmak. u. Exp. Path. 258, 128–149 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00535788
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00535788