Skip to main content
Log in

A taste aversion model of drug discrimination learning: training drug and condition influence rate of learning, sensitivity and drug specificity

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model of drug discrimination based on a lithium chloride (LiCl) flavour aversion was described and examined. Mildly thirsty rats were presented daily with 4 ml of a distinctly flavoured solution which was followed on 50% of the days by an IP injection of LiCl. Prior to the flavour presentation, the rats were injection SC with saline or a training drug (0.04 mg/kg fentanyl or 20 mg/kg pentobarbital) to signal whether LiCl would follow. Almost all rats eventually exhibited stable behaviour that involved drinking most or all of the fluid when it was not to be followed by LiCl and little or no drinking when it was. Such discrimination occurred regardless of whether drug predicted LiCl (learned-discomfort) or predicted no LiCl (learned-safety). However, with fentanyl there were clear differences between rats trained with drug under learned-safety and under learned-discomfort conditions for 1) the rate of acquisition of stable performance as a function of LiCl dose, 2) generalization of the training dose to a test dose that was lower, and 3) elicitation of fentanyl responses by pentobarbital. These findings, together with indications that such effects did not always occur with pentobarbital as the training drug, were discussed from theoretical and practical perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braveman NS (1975) Formation of taste aversions in rats following prior exposure to sickness. Learn Motiv 6:512–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC (1978) Theoretical review: discriminative stimulus properties of narcotic analgesic drugs. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 9:863–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC (1982) The pharmacological specificity of operate drug discrimination. In: Colpaert FC, Slangen JL (eds) Drug discrimination: applications in CNS pharmacology. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautz M, Jeffreys R, McBride S, Pournaghash S, Schwartz M, Titley T, Wachsman A, Mastropaolo JP, Riley AL (1987) The sensitivity of conditioned taste aversions as a behavioral baseline to assess the discriminative stimulus properties of naloxone. Neurosci Abstr 13:1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucki I (1988) Rapid discrimination of the stimulus properties of 5-hydroxytryptamine agonists using conditioned taste aversion. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 247:1120–1127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin GM, Gans M, van der Kooy D (1989) Discriminative properties of morphine that modulate associations between taste and lithium chloride (in press)

  • Mastropaolo JP, Moskowitz KH, Dacanay RJ, Riley AL (1986) Conditioned taste aversions in rats as a behavioral baseline for the assessment of the stimulus properties of phencyclidine. Neurosci Abstr 12:912

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucha RF, Herz A (1985) Motivational properties of kappa and mu opioid receptor agonists studied with place and taste preference conditioning. Psychopharmacology 86:274–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mucha RF, Iversen SD (1984) Reinforcing properties of morphine and naloxone revealed by conditioned place preferences: a procedural examination. Psychopharmacology 82:241–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mucha RF, Iversen SD (1986) Increased food intake after opioid microinjections into nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area of rat. Brain Res 397:214–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nachman M (1970) Learned taste and temperature aversions due to lithium chloride sickness after temporal delays. J Comp Physiol Psychol 73:22–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1977) Comparison of ethanol, pentobarbital and phenobarbital using drug versus drug discrimination training. Psychopharmacology 53:195–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1982) Comparison of the degree of discriminability of various drugs using the T-maze drug discrimination paradigm. Psychopharmacology 76:385–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA, Batta SK (1979) Investigation of narcotics and anti-tussives using drug discrimination techniques. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 211:401–408

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Revusky S, Coombes S, Pohl RW (1982) Drug states as discriminative stimuli in a flavour-aversion learning experiment. J Comp Physiol Psychol 96:200–211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riley AL, Jeffreys RJ, Pournaghash S, Titley TL, Kufera AM (1989) Conditioned taste aversions as a behavioral baseline for drug discrimination learning: an assessment with the dipsogenic compound pentobarbital (in press)

  • Richter JA, Holtman JR Jr (1982) Barbiturates: their in vivo effects and potential biochemical mechanisms. Prog Neurobiol 18:275–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman GT, Herz A (1982) Evidence that the discriminative stimulus properties of fentanyl and ethylketazocine are mediated by an interaction with different opiate receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 221:735–739

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolerman IP, Shine PJ (1985) Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with cross-indexed bibliography, 1982–1983. Psychopharmacology 86:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaeger, T.V., Mucha, R.F. A taste aversion model of drug discrimination learning: training drug and condition influence rate of learning, sensitivity and drug specificity. Psychopharmacology 100, 145–150 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244397

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244397

Key words

Navigation