Abstract
The effects of 0.75 mg/kg of R-DOM and 1.0 mg/kg of S-amphetamine served as discriminative stimuli in the control of a two-lever discrimination response. Dose-response evaluation of the two agents indicated that in S-amphetamine-trained animals the drug effects produced by test doses of 0.5 to 2.2 mg/kg of S-amphetamine could be considered as a dose-dependent continuum of low to high stimulus intensity. In R-DOM trained subjects, low to moderate doses of R-DOM (0.5–1.5 mg/kg) produced dose-related discriminative responding, but the high dose of R-DOM (2.2 mg/kg) resulted in random responding. When animals trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of S-amphetamine from saline were given 0.5 or 0.75 mg/kg of R-DOM, they tended to respond on the drug correct lever. However, higher doses of R-DOM (1.5 and 2.2 mg/kg) produced random responding. Similarly, animals trained to discriminate 0.75 mg/kg of R-DOM from saline exhibited correct responses following 0.5 and 0.75 mg/kg of S-amphetamine, but not after 1.5 and 2.2 mg/kg. These data suggest that low doses of R-DOM produce discriminative stimuli that are qualitatively different from those of higher doses. Stimuli following low doses of R-DOM also appear similar in some respects to those following low doses of S-amphetamine.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beaton, J. M., Smythies, J. R., Benington, F., Morin, R. D.: The behavioral effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methyl-amphetamine (DOM) in rats. Comm. Behav. Biol. 3, 81–84 (1969)
Benington, F., Morin, R. D., Beaton, J., Smythies, J. R., Bradley, R. J.: Comparative effects of stereoisomers of hallucinogenic amphetamines. Nature New Biol. 242, 185–186 (1973)
Ferster, C., Skinner, B.: Schedules of Reinforcement. New York: Appelton-Century-Crofts 1957
Fujimori, M., Himwich, H.: Electroencephalographic alerting sites of d-amphetamine and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methyl-amphetamine. Nature (Lond.) 220, 491–494 (1968)
Fujimori, M., Himwich, H.: EEG arousal reactions to amphetamine and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine in reserpine-pretreated rabbits. Biol. Psychiat. 2, 241–250 (1970)
Hirschhorn, I. D., Winter, J. C.: Mescaline and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) as discriminative stimuli. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 22, 64–71 (1971)
Huang, J.: Biochemical and pharmacological study of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM, STP) and analogs. Ph. D. Thesis. The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences (1972)
Huang, J., Ho, B. T.: Discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine and related compounds in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2, 669–673 (1974)
Kuhn, D., Appel, J., Greenberg, I.: An analysis of some discriminative properties of d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 39, 57–66 (1974)
Shulgin, A. T.: Stereospecific requirements for hallucinogens. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 25, 271–272 (1973)
Snyder, S. H., Faillace, L., Weingartner, H.: DOM (STP), A new hallucinogenic drug and DOET: Effects in normal subjects. Amer. J. Psychiat. 125, 357–364 (1968)
Tilson, H. A., Cavanagh, R. L., Baker, T. G., Gylys, J. A.: Neuropharmacological analysis of R(−)-2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (R-DOM). Pharmacologist 16, 205 (1974)
Tilson, H. A., Baker, T. G., Chamberlain, J. H., Marquis, W. J., Rech, R. H.: Behavioral and neuropharmacological analysis of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine and amphetamine in rats. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 44, 229–239 (1975)
Vrbanac, J. J., Tilson, H. A., Moore, K. E., Rech, R. H.: Comparison of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) and d-amphetamine for in vivo efflux of catecholamines from rat brain. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 3, 57–64 (1975
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tilson, H.A., Baker, T.G. & Gylys, J.A. A comparison of the discriminative stimulus properties of R-2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (R-DOM) and S-amphetamine in the rat. Psychopharmacologia 44, 225–228 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00428898
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00428898