Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of haloperidol on the partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE): implications for neuroleptic drug action on reinforcement and nonreinforcement

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of haloperidol 0.1 mg/kg on the partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) paradigm at one trial a day, were examined. Two groups of rats were trained to run in a straight alley. The continuously reinforced (CRF) group received food reward on every trial. The partially reinforced (PRF) group was rewarded on a quasirandom 50% schedule. All animals were then tested in extinction. Haloperidol 0.1 mg/kg was administered in a 2 × 2 design, i.e., drug-no drug in acquisition and drug-no drug in extinction. The PREE, i.e., increased resistance to extinction of partially reinforced as compared to continuously reinforced animals, was obtained in all four drug conditions. The administration of haloperidol in acquisition increased markedly resistance to extinction in CRF animals. The administration of the drug in extinction decreased resistance to extinction in both CRF and PRF animals. The results are explained in terms of two independent actions of haloperidol: the well-known effect of reduction in the effectiveness of reinforcement as well as enhancement of the effectiveness of nonreinforcement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anisman H, Zacharko RM (1982) Stimulus change influences escape performance: deficits induced by unctrollable stress and by haloperidol. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 17:263–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Anisman H, Remington G, Sklar LS (1979) Effects of inescapable shock on subsequent escape performance: catecholaminergic and cholinergic mediation of response initiation and maintenance. Psychopharmacology 61:107–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Beninger RJ, Freedman NL (1982) The use of two operants to examine the nature of pimozide-induced decrease in responding for brain stimulation. Physiol Psychol 10:409–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Beninger RJ, MacLennan AJ, Pinnel JPJ (1980a) The use of conditioned defensive burying to test the effects of pimozide on associative learning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:445–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Beninger RJ, Mason ST, Phillips AG, Fibiger HC (1980b) The use of extinction to investigate the nature of neuroleptic-induced avoidance deficits. Psychopharmacology 69:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Beninger RS, Cheng M, Hahn BL, Hoffman DC, Mazurski EJ, Morency MA, Ramm P, Stewart RJ (1987) Effects of extinction, pimozide, SCH 23390 and metoclopramide on food-rewarded operant responding of rats. Psychopharmacology 92:343–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Corradini A, Tombaugh TN, Anisman H (1984) Effects of pimozide on escape and discrimination performance in a water-escape task. Behav Neurosci 98:96–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettenberg A, Camp CH (1986a) Haloperidol induces a partial reinforcement extinction effect in rats: implications for a dopamine involvement in food reward. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 25:813–821

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettenberg A, Camp CH (1986b) A partial reinforcement extinction effect in water — reinforced rats intermittently treated with haloperidol. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 25:1231–1235

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettenberg A, Koob GF, Bloom FE (1981) Response artifact in the measurement of neuroleptic-induced anhedonia. Science 213:357–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldon J, Gray JA (1981) The partial reinforcement extinction effect after treatment with chlordiazepoxide. Psychopharmacology 73:269–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Fibiger HC (1978) Drugs and reinforcement: a critical review of the catecholamine theory. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 18:37–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Fibiger HC, Zis AP, Phillips AG (1975) Haloperidol induced disruption of conditioned avoidance responding: attenuation by prior training or by anti-cholinergic drugs. Eur J Pharmacol 30:309–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin KBJ, McCoy SN (1979) Pimozide-induced extinction in rats: Stimulus control of responding rules out motor deficit. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 11:71–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray JA (1975) Elements of a two-process theory of learning. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Halevy G, Feldon J, Weiner I (1986) The effects of clonidine on the partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE). Psychopharmacology 90:95–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman JM (1982) Discriminating between reward and performance: a critical review of intracranial self-stimulation methodology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 7:45–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh NJ (1974) The psychology of animal learning. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason ST, Beninger RJ, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1980) Pimozide-induced suppression of responding: evidence against a block of food reward. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:917–923

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips AG, Fibiger HC (1979) Decreased resistance to extinction after haloperidol: implications for the role of dopamine in reinforcement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 10:751–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips AG, McDonald AC, Wilkie DM (1981) Disruption of autoshaped responding to a signal of brain-stimulation reward by neuroleptic drugs. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 14:543–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyraki C, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1982) Attenuation of place preference conditioning using food reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 77:379–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh TN, Tombaugh J, Anisman H (1979) Effects of dopamine receptor blockade on alimentary behaviors: home cage food consumption, magazine training, operant acquisition, and performance. Psychopharmacology 66:219–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh TN, Anisman H, Tombaugh J (1980) Extinction and dopamine receptor blockade after intermittent reinforcement training: failure to observe functional equivalence. Psychopharmacology 70:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner I, Bercovitz H, Lubow RE, Feldon J (1985) The abolition of the partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) by amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 86:318–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner I, Feldon J, Bercovitz H (1987) The abolition of the partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) by amphetamine: disruption of control by nonreinforcement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 27:205–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA (1982) Neuroleptics and operant behavior. Behav Brain Sci 5:39–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA, Colle LM (1984) Pimozide attenautes free feeding: best scores analysis reveals a motivational deficit. Psychopharmacology 84:446–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA, Spindler H, deWitt H, Gerber GJ (1978) Neuroleptic-induced “anhedonia” in rats; pimozide blocks the reward quality of food. Science 201:262–264

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feldon, J., Katz, Y. & Weiner, I. The effects of haloperidol on the partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE): implications for neuroleptic drug action on reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Psychopharmacology 95, 528–533 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172968

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172968

Key words

Navigation