Skip to main content
Log in

Large-scale aquifer sensitivity model

  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

A 480-square-mile region within Will County, in northeastern Illinois, was used as a test region for the development of a methodology to map the sensitivity of aquifers to contamination. An aquifer sensitivity model was developed using a geographic information system (GIS) to overlay and combine several data layers. The components used for our model are: (1) depth to sand and gravel or bedrock, (2) thickness of the uppermost sand and gravel aquifer, (3) glacial drift thickness, and (4) bedrock geology. The model is an improvement over many previous aquifer sensitivity models because it combines specific information on depth to the uppermost aquifer with information on the thickness of the uppermost sand and gravel aquifer. This county-wide model results in an aquifer sensitivity map that can be a useful tool for making land-use planning decisions regarding aquifer protection and management of groundwater resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abert CC and Berg RC (1993) Aquifer sensitivity of southern Will County. Champaign, IL: State Geological Survey Map, scale 1:100,000

  • Abert CC, Krumm RJ, Riggs MH, McLean MM, and McKay ED (1993a) Cumulative thickness of sand and gravel, southern Will County. Champaign, IL: State Geological Survey Open File Map 1993-9d, scale 1:100,000

  • Abert CC, Krumm RJ, Riggs MH, McLean MM, and McKay ED (1993b) Thickness of Quaternary deposits, southern Will County. Champaign, IL: State Geological Survey Open File Map 1993-9c, scale 1:100,000

  • Berg RC and Kempton JP (1984) Potential for contamination of shallow aquifers by land burial of municipal wastes. Champaign, IL: State Geological Survey Map, scale 1:500,000

  • Berg RC, Kempton JP, and Stecyk AN (1984) Geology for planning in Boone and Winnebago counties. Champaign, IL: State Geological Survey Circular 532, 69 pp

  • Cartwright K and Hensel B (1993) Hydrogeology. In Daniel DE (Ed): Geotechnical practices for waste disposal. New York: Chapman and Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynamic Graphics, Inc. (1992) Geologic modeling program user's guide. Alameda, CA, pp 4-1–4-14

  • Ertle M (1990) Information exchange on models and data needs relating to the impact of agricultural practices on water quality: Workshop proceedings. USGS Office of Water Data Quality Coordination, co-sponsored by the USGS, USDA Agriculture Research Service, and USDA Soil Conservation Service, Reston, VA, 2–5 February 1990, 217 pp

  • Graese AM (1991) Generalized bedrock geology of Will County. Champaign, IL: State Geological Survey unpublished map, scale 1:100,000

  • Keefer DA and Berg RC (1990) Potential for aquifer recharge in Illinois. Champaign, IL: State Geological Survey Map, scale 1:1,000,000

  • Klaseus TG, Buzicky GC, and Schneider EC (1989) Pesticides and groundwater: Surveys of selected Minnesota wells. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Department of Public Health and Minnesota Department of Agriculture, 95 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolpin DW and Burkhart MR (1989) Indicators of pesticides in shallow aquifers in Iowa. Washington, DC: USGS Open-file Report 89-409, 47 pp

  • Kross BC, Hallberg GR, Bruner DR, and others (1990) The Iowa statewide rural well-water survey. IA: Iowa City, Iowa Department of Natural Resourses Technical Information Series 19, 142 pp

  • Lusch DP, Rader CP, Barrett LR, and Rader NK (1992) Aquifer vulnerability to surface contamination in Michigan. East Lansing, MI: Center for Remote Sensing, Michigan State University, map, scale 1:500,000

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettyjohn WA, Savoca M, and Self D (1991) Regional assessment of aquifer vulnerability and sensitivity in the conterminous United States. Washington, DC: USEPA Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, EPA/600/2-91/043, 319 pp

  • Schmidt RR and Kessler K (1987) Groundwater contamination susceptibility in Wisconsin (a map in: Report no. 5, Groundwater contamination susceptibility map and evaluation). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Wisconsin's Groundwater Management Plan, Report no. 5, scale 1:1,000,000

    Google Scholar 

  • Schock SC, Mehnert E, Caughey ME, and others (1992) Pilot study: Agricultural chemicals in Illinois' rural private wells. Champaign, IL: State Water Survey and State Geological Survey Cooperative Groundwater Report 14, 84 pp

  • Soller DR and Berg RC (1992a) A model for the assessment of aquifer contamination potential based on regional geologic framework. Environ Geol Water Sci 19:205–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Soller DR and Berg RC (1992b) Using regional geologic information to assess relative aquifer contamination potential-an example from the central United States: Washington, DC: USGS open-file Report 92-694, Map, scale 1:1,000,000

  • Suter M, Bergstrom RE, Smith HF, Emrich GH, Walton WC, and Larson TE (1959) Preliminary report on groundwater resources of the Chicago region. Champaign, IL: State Water Survey and State Geological Survey Cooperative Groundwater Report 1, 89 pp

  • USEPA (1993) Ground Water Resource Assessment, Washington, DC: Office of Water, EPA 813-R-93-003, 232 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berg, R.C., Abert, C.C. Large-scale aquifer sensitivity model. Geo 24, 34–42 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00768075

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00768075

Key words

Navigation