Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of low pass filtering on the brainstem auditory evoked potential in the rat

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effects of low pass filtering on the brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) were studied in the adult male rat. The bandpass of the recording system was progressively widened while the cut-off frequency of the high pass filter remained constant at 3.2 Hz. When the high frequency cut-off was 320 Hz or less, the principal waveform recorded in response to a click stimulus was a slow positive-negative complex. As the high frequency setting was raised from 800 Hz to 3.2 kHz, the slow components of the brainstem were replaced by four fast BAEP waves (I, II, III and IV). As the bandpass widened there was an increase in amplitude and a decrease in the absolute latency of all four fast waves in the order of 0.1 ms although the wave I–IV interpeak latency remained unaffected. The results confirm that the high frequency components of the BAEP are underlain by a slow positivity of uncertain origin followed by a slow negativity which probably arises within the inferior colliculus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achor LJ, Starr A (1980a) Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. I. Intracranial and extracranial recordings. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 48: 154–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Achor LJ, Starr A (1980b) Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. II. Effects of lesions. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 48: 174–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston JR, Ainslie PJ (1980) Effects of analog and digital filtering on brain stem auditory evoked potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 48: 361–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchwald JS, Huang C-M (1975) Far-field acoustic response: origins in the cat. Science 189: 382–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacace AT, Shy M, Satya-Murti S (1980) Brainstem auditory evoked potentials: a comparison of two high-frequency filter settings. Neurology 30: 765–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis H, Hirsh SK (1979) A slow brain stem response for low-frequency audiometry. Audiology 18: 445–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle DJ, Hyde ML (1981) Bessel filtering of brain stem auditory evoked potentials. Electroecenph Clin Neurophysiol 51: 446–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Funai H, Funasaka S (1983) Experimental study on the effect of inferior colliculus lesions upon auditory brain stem response. Audiology 22: 9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardi J, Merzenich M, McKean C (1979) Origins of the scalprecorded frequency — following response in the cat. Audiology 18: 353–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto I, Ishiyama Y, Yoshimoto T, Nemoto S (1981) Brain stem auditory-evoked potentials recorded directly from human brain-stem and thalamus. Brain 104: 841–859

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto I (1982) Auditory evoked potentials from the human midbrain: slow brain stem responses. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 53: 652–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C-M, Buchwald JS (1977) Interpretation of the vertex short-latency acoustic response: a study of single neurons in the brain stem. Brain Res 137: 291–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen R, Benignus VA, Grimes LM, Dyer RS (1986) Unrecognized errors due to analog filtering of the brain-stem auditory evoked response. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 65: 203–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewett DL (1970) Volume-conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging in the cat. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 28: 609–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewett DL, Romano MN (1972) Neonatal development of auditory system potentials averaged from the scalp of rat and cat. Brain Res 36: 101–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller AR, Jannetta PJ (1982) Evoked potentials from the inferior colliculus in man. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 53: 612–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Picton TW, Hillyard SA, Krausz HI, Galambos R (1974) Human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 36: 179–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantz RG, Williston JS, Jewett DL (1974) Spatio-temporal distribution of auditory-evoked far field potentials in rat and cat. Brain Res 68: 55–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw NA (1986) The effect of pentobarbital on the auditory evoked response in the brainstem of the rat. Neuropharmacology 25: 63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson GV, Knight RT, Brailowsky S, Prospero-Garcia O, Scabini D (1985) Altered peripheral and brainstem auditory function in aged rats. Brain Res 348: 28–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW (1980) Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in neurology: methodology, interpretation, clinical application. In: Aminoff MJ (ed) Electrodiagnosis in clinical neurology. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 370–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurlow WR, Gross NB, Kemp EH, Lowy K (1951) Microelectrode studies of neural auditory activity of cat: inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 14: 289–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiederholt WC, Iragui-Madoz VJ (1977) Far field somatosensory potentials in the rat. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 42: 456–465

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by the Medical Research Council of New Zealand

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaw, N.A. Effects of low pass filtering on the brainstem auditory evoked potential in the rat. Exp Brain Res 65, 686–690 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00235994

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00235994

Key words

Navigation