Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the pharmacodynamic effects of furosemide and BAY g 2821 and correlation of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of BAY g 2821 (muzolimine)

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a biometrically planned, double-blind study on 12 Oedema-free male patients the saluretic effect of muzolimine 30 mg was compared with furosemide 40 mg. The plasma level of muzolimine was determined and correlated with its pharmacodynamics. In terms of excretion during the 12-hour observation period muzolimine 30 mg had as great a cumulative effect as furosemide 40 mg. There was a significant difference in the time-response curve. During the first two hours furosemide 40 mg had more saluretic effect than muzolimine 30 mg. Between two and four hours there was no significant difference between the two substances. Between four and six hours, however, muzolimine was somewhat more effective than furosemide, although the difference did not reach the level of significance. After 6 h there was no longer any difference between the two compounds. The half-life of the fall in concentration of muzolimine in plasma was 3.7 up to 10 h after its administration. The time-response curve of the increased urine excretion correlated well with the time course of the concentration of muzolimine in plasma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berg, K.J., Jørstadt, S., Tromsdal, A.: Studies on the clinical pharmacology of a new potent diuretic, BAY g 2821. Pharmatherapeutica1, 319–332 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fauchald, P., Lind, E.: Double blind cross-over study on the diuretic effect of BAY g 2821 and furosemide in patients with cardiac edema. Pharmatherapeutica1, 409–414 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heinrich, F., Loew, D., Dýcka, J.: Zur diuretischen Wirkung von BAY g 2821 beim hepatogenen Aszites. Curr. Med. Res. Opin.4, 706–715 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hoppe-Seyler, G., Heissler, A., Cöppencastrop, M., Schindler, M., Schollmeyer, P., Ritter, W.: Investigations on the effect of a new diuretic BAY g 2821 in patients suffering from kidney diseases. Pharmatherapeutica1, 422–429 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meng, K., Loew, D., Stoepel, K., Hoffmeister, F.: Zur Pharmakologie von BAY g 2821, einem high ceiling Diuretikum mit langer Wirkungsdauer. Curr. Med. Res. Opin.4, 555–563 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Muschaweck, R., Hajdú, P.: Die salidiuretische Wirksamkeit der Chlor-N-(2-furylmethyl)-5-sulfamyl-anthranilsäure. Arzneim.-Forsch.14, 44–47 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ritter, W.: Thin-layer densitometric determination of BAY g 2821 in the nanogram range. J. Chromatogr.142, 431–440 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Röckel, A.: Diuretic effects of the pyrazolinon compound, BAY g 2821 in patients with advanced renal failure. Curr. Med. Res. Opin.4, 574–579 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Snedecor, G.W., Cochran, W.G.: Statistical methods. 6th ed. Iowa: Iowa State University Press 1969

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loew, D., Ritter, W. & Dýcka, J. Comparison of the pharmacodynamic effects of furosemide and BAY g 2821 and correlation of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of BAY g 2821 (muzolimine). Eur J Clin Pharmacol 12, 341–344 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00562448

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00562448

Key words

Navigation