Summary
We examined 84 lower segment caesarean section scars by ultrasonography near term. Seventy scars showed good healing with a thickness of the lower uterine segment of more than 3 mm; 14 scars showed poor healing with a thickness of less than 2 mm and loss of continuity. Among 70 patients with good healing, 24 patients delivered vaginally but the remaining 46 patients have had repeat caesarean sections for other obstetric indications. Intraoperative findings in these 46 patients were as follows: Grade I (no thinning of the lower uterine segment), 42; Grade II (thinning and loss of continuity of the lower uterine segment but fetal hair not visible), 4; Grade III (thinning of the lower uterine segment and fetal hair visible), 0. Fourteen patients with poor healing had repeat caesarean sections. Intraoperative findings in these 14 patients were as follows: Grade I, 0; Grade II, 9; Grade III, 5. These results indicate that ultrasound examination detect thinning of the lower uterine segment and may help to determine management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Committee on Obstetrics (1985) Maternal and fetal medicine. ACOG Newsletter. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Chicago
Farmakides G, Duvivier R, Schulman H, Schneider E, Biordi (1987) Vaginal birth after two or more previous cesarean sections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:565–566
Finley BE, Gibbs CE (1986) Emergent cesarean delivery in patients undergoing a trial of labor with a transverse lower segment scar. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:936–939
O'Driscoll K (1966) Rupture of the uterus. Proc R Soc Med 59:65–66
Palerme GR, Friedman EA (1966) Rupture of the gravid uterus in the third trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol 94:571–576
Silver RK, Gibbs RS (1987) Predictors of vaginal delivery in patients with a previous cesarean section, who require oxytocin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:57–60
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fukuda, M., Fukuda, K. & Mochizuki, M. Examination of previous caesarean section scars by ultrasound. Arch Gynecol Obstet 243, 221–224 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00932271
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00932271