Skip to main content
Log in

A prospective study using rhinomanometry and patient clinical satisfaction to determine if objective measurements of nasal airway resistance can improve the quality of septoplasty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the ENT Department of University Central Hospital, Turku, the waiting list for elective septoplasty grew to 4 to 5 years in the late 1980s. Therefore, a prospective clinical project was initiated during which all patients waiting for septal surgery were re-examined and nasal airway function was measured with rhinomanometry. Patients with high nasal resistance or other specific indications for nasal obstruction were selected for surgery (n = 432). The remaining patients were excluded from surgery and followed up (n = 284). Results showed that if patients were referred for septal surgery without rhinomanometric study, about 10% became symptom-free within 3 to 5 years. Patients operated on after defining a high preoperative intranasal resistance had a higher postoperative satisfaction level (85%) than those operated on with normal nasal resistances but other indications for correcting the nasal septum (69%). After 3 years, the majority of patients not treated surgically were satisfied with their conservative treatments, although certain patients still required some form of nasal surgery to relieve recurring nasal and/or sinus complaints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aschan G, Dretmer B, Rouge H (1958) A new technique for measuring nasal resistance to breathing, illustrated by the effects of histamine and physical effort. Ann Acad Reg Sci Ups 2:11–126

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bachert C, Feldmeth B (1988) Die computerunterstützte Rhinomanometrie (CAR) HNO 36:277–281

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bohlin L, Dahlqvist A (1994) Nasal airway resistance and complications following functional septoplasty: A ten-year follow-up study. Rhinology 32:195–197

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broms P, Jonson B, Malm L (1982) Rhinomanometry II. A system for numerical description of nasal airway resistance. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 94:157–168

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cole P, Chaban R, Naito K, Oprysk D (1988) The obstructive nasal septum. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 114:410–412

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dishoeck HAE van (1963) The part of the valve and the turbinates in total nasal resistance. Int Rhinol 3:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dommerby H, Rasmussen O, Rosborg J (1985) Long-term results of septoplastic operations. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 47:151–157

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gordon A, McCaffrey T, Kern E, Pallanch J (1989) Rhinomanometry for preoperative and postoperative assessment of nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 101:20–26

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jessen M, Malm L (1984) The importance of nasal airway resistance and nasal symptoms in the selection of patients for septoplasty. Rhinology 22:157–164

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jessen M, Malm L (1991) The spontaneous course of nasal obstruction in patients with normal nasal airway resistance. Clin Otolaryngol 16:302–304

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mertz J, McCaffrey T, Kern E (1984) Objective evaluation of anterior septal surgical reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 92:308–311

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mygind N (1979) Nasal allergy, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mygind P (1980) Measurement of nasal airway resistance — is it only for article writers? (editorial). Clin Otolaryngol 5:161–163

    Google Scholar 

  14. Naito K, Cole P, Chaban R, Oprysk D (1988) Nasal resistance, sensation of obstruction and rhinoscopic findings compared. Am J Rhinol 2:65–69

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pinkpank A (1986) Beziehungen zwischen Selbsteinstufung der Nasenatmung, Rhinoskopie und Rhinomanometrie. HNO 34:194–197

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simola M, Bliss L, Holopainen E, Malmberg H (1991) Longterm clinical course of hypersensitive rhinitis. Rhinol 29:301–306

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sipilä J, Suonpää J, Salmivalli A, Laippala P (1990) The effect of the nasal cycle on the interpretation of rhinomanometric results in a nasal provocation test. Am J Rhinol 4:179–184

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sipilä J, Suonpää J, Kortekangas A, Laippala P (1992) A new Finnish computerized rhinomanometer. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 492:58–62

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sipilä J, Suonpää J, Laippala P (1992) Rhinomanometry before septoplasty. An approach to clinical material with diverse nasal symptoms. Am J Rhinol 6:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  20. Suonpää J, Sipilä J, Laippala P (1993) Do rhinomanometric findings predict subjective postoperative satisfaction? A longterm follow-up after septoplasty. (1993) Am J Rhinol 7:71–75

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vainio-Mattila J (1974) Correlations of nasal symptoms and signs in random sampling study. Thesis, University of Turku. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 318:1–48

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wengraf CL, Gleeson MJ, Siodlak MZ (1986) The stuffy nose: a comparative study of two common methods of treatment. Clin Otolaryngol 11:61–68

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sipilä, J., Suonpää, J. A prospective study using rhinomanometry and patient clinical satisfaction to determine if objective measurements of nasal airway resistance can improve the quality of septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 254, 387–390 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01642556

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01642556

Key words

Navigation