Abstract
Background: A prospective study was conducted to compare the analgesic effects of sub-Tenon’s and retrobulbar anesthesia by assessing patients’ response to the visceral stimulus. Methods: Seven hundred and twenty eyes of 720 patients underwent extracapsular cataract extraction and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. They received retrobulbar anesthesia with 3 ml lidocaine (225 eyes), retrobulbar anesthesia with 5 ml lidocaine (216 eyes), or sub-Tenon’s anesthesia with 3 ml lidocaine (279 eyes). Pain scores were recorded when an acetylcholine chloride solution was injected into the anterior chamber to attain miosis after lens implantation. Results: Pain scores were significantly different among the three anesthesia groups (P<0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test). The multiple comparison revealed that analgesic effects were highest with sub-Tenon’s anesthesia, followed by 5-ml retrobulbar and 3-ml retrobulbar anesthesia. Conclusion: Sub-Tenon’s anesthesia is an effective and reliable anesthetic method in cataract surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 8 March 1999 Accepted: 25 August 1999
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tokuda, Y., Oshika, T., Amano, S. et al. Analgesic effects of sub-Tenon’s versus retrobulbar anesthesia in planned extracapsular cataract extraction. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238, 228–231 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004170050348
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004170050348