Skip to main content
Log in

Nuclear matrix-bound replicational sites detected in situ by 5-bromodeoxyuridine

  • Published:
Histochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The nuclear matrix was prepared in situ from Swiss 3T3 cells, which were synchronized by contact inhibition and serum starvation and pulse-labelled for very short periods of time with 5-bromodeoxyuridine (5-BrdU). For the first time 5-BrdU has been employed to demonstrate the association of newly synthesized DNA with a nucleoskeleton. Immunofluorescence analysis using a monoclonal antibody to 5-BrdU revealed five different intranuclear staining patterns at different stages of the S phase. These patterns were observed also in intact cells and did not change during the matrix preparation steps which involve extraction with 2M NaCl and DNase I digestion. Such an observation was also confirmed by spatial confocal microscopy studies. The intensity of lfuorescence, which was evaluated by cytofluorometry, increased to reach a maximum during mid-S phase and then decreased. Because no significant difference was found in the time to label residual DNA of different 5-BrdU staining patterns, this strongly suggests that a different number of replicons is activated at different stages of the S phase. These results strengthen the hypothesis that eukaryotic DNA replication occurs in close association with an insoluble protein nuclear skeleton, which determines the three-dimensional spatial organization of chromosome duplication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashihara T, Kamachi M, Urata Y, Kusuzaki K, Takeshita H, Kagawa K (1986) Multiparametic analysis using autostage cytofluorometry. Acta Histochem Cytochem 19:51–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfalvi G, Tanke H, Raap AK, Slats J, van der Ploeg M (1990) Early replication signals in nuclei of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Histochemistry 94:435–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Basnakian A, Banfalvi G, Sarkar N (1989) Contribution of DNA polymerase delta to DNA replication in permeable CHO cells synchronized in S phase. Nucleic Acids Res 17:4757–4767

    Google Scholar 

  • Berezney R (1984) Organization and function of the nuclear matrix. In: Hnilica LS (ed) Chromosomal nonhistone proteins. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 119–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Berezney R, Buchholtz L (1981) Dynamic association of replicating DNA fragments with the nuclear matrix of regenerating liver. Exp Cell Res 132:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Berezney R, Coffey DS (1975) Nuclear protein matrix: association with newly synthesized DNA. Science 189:291–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger NA, Petzold SJ, Johnson ES (1977) High molecular weight DNA intermediates synthesized by permeabilized L cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 478:44–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo R, Macdonald Bravo H (1987) Existence of two populations of cyclin/proliferating cell nuclear antigen during the cell cycle: association with DNA replication sites. J Cell Biol 105:1549–1554

    Google Scholar 

  • Carri MT, Micheli G, Graziano E, Pace T, Buongiorno-Nardelli M (1986) The relationship between chromosomal origins of replication and the nuclear matrix during the cell cycle. Exp Cell Res 164:426–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocco L, Maraldi NM, Manzoli FA, Gilmour RS, Lang A (1980) Phospholipid interactions in rat liver nuclear matrix. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 96:890–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins JM (1978) Rates of DNA synthesis during the S-phase of HeLa Cells. J Biol Chem 253:8570–8577

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook PR (1988) The nucleoskeleton: artefact, passive framework or active site? J Cell Sci 90:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook PR (1991) The nucleoskeleton and the topology of replication. Cell 66:627–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierendonck JH van, Keyzer R, Velde CJH van de, Cornelisse CJ (1989) Subdivision of S-phase by analysis of nuclear 5-bromodeoxyuridine staining patterns. Cytometry 10:143–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkwell PA, Mullenders LHF, Wanka F (1979) Analysis of replicating DNA to a nuclear matrix in mammalian interphase nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res 6:219–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkwell PA, Wenink PW, Poddighe J (1986) Permanent attachment of replication origins to the nuclear matrix in BHK-cells. Nucleic Acids Res 14:3241–3249

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolbeare F, Gratzner HG, Pallavicini MG, Gray JW (1983) Flow cytometric measurement of total DNA content and incorporated BrdU. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:5573–5576

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwart J, Dormer P (1985) Effect of 5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine (FdUrd) on 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdUrd) incorporation into DNA measured with a monoclonal BrdUrd antibody and by the BrdUrd/Hoechst quenching effect. Cytometry 6:513–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster KA, Collins JM (1985) The interrelation between DNA synthesis rates and DNA polymerases bound to the nuclear matrix in synchronized HeLa Cells. J Biol Chem 260:4229–4235

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox MH, Arndt-Jovin DJ, Jovin TM, Baumann PH, Robert-Nicoud R (1991) Spatial and temporal organization of DNA replication sites localized by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy in mouse fibroblasts. J Cell Sci 99:247–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratzner HG (1982) Monoclonal antibody to 5-bromo- and 5-iododeoxyuridine: a new reagent for detection of DNA replication. Science 218:474–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamada S, Namura K, Itoh R, Fujita S (1987) Characteristics of colorectal epithelia and adenomas as revealed by DNA cytofluorometry. Jpn J Cancer Res 78:826–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman JA, Tsai A, Deich RA (1973) DNA replication sites within nuclei of mammalian cells. Nature 241:32–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DA, Cook PR (1986) Replication occurs at a nucleoskeleton. EMBO J 5:1403–1410

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DA, Dickinson P, Cook PR (1990) Attachment of DNA to the nucleoskeleton of HeLa cells examined using physiological conditions. Nucleic Acids Res 18:4385–4393

    Google Scholar 

  • Kill IR, Bridger JM, Campbell KHS, Maldonado-Codina G, Hutchinson CJ (1991) The timing of the formation and usage of replicase clusters in S-phase nuclei of human diploid fibroblasts. J Cell Sci 100:869–876

    Google Scholar 

  • Maraldi NM, Marinelli F, Cocco L, Papa S, Santi P, Manzoli FA (1986) Morphometric analysis and topological organization of nuclear matrix in freeze-fracture electron microscopy. Exp Cell Res 163:349–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzotti G, Rizzoli R, Galanzi A, Papa S, Vitale M, Falconi M, Neri LM, Zini N, Maraldi NM (1990) High resolution detection of newly synthesized DNA by anti-bromodeoxyuridine antibodies identifies specific chromatin domains. J Histochem Cytochem 37:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • McReady SJ, Godwin J, Mason DW, Brazell IA, Cook PR (1980) DNA is replicated at the nuclear cage. J Cell Sci 46:365–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng C, Berezney R (1991) Replicon cluster domains persist throughout the cell cycle of mouse 3T3 cells. J Cell Biol 115 (3, part 2): 95a

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirkovitch J, Mirault ME, Laemmli UK (1984) Organization of the higher order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell 39:223–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura H, Morita T, Sato C (1986) Structural organizations of replicon domains during DNA synthetic phase in the mammalian nucleus. Exp Cell Res 165:291–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakayasu H, Berezney R (1989) Mapping replicational sites in the eucaryotic cell nucleus. J Cell Biol 108:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Keefe RT, Henderson SC, Spector DL (1992) Dynamic organization of DNA replication in mammalian cell nuclei: spatially and temporally defined replication of chromosome-specific alfa-satellite DNA sequences. J Cell Biol 116:1095–1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardoll DM, Vogelstein B, Coffey DS (1980) A fixed site of DNA replication in eucaryotic cells. Cell 19:527–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Patriotis C, Djondjurov L (1989) Tightly bound DNA-protein complexes representing stable attachment sites of large DNA loops to components of the matrix. Eur J Biochem 184:157–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HC, Puvion E, Buchholtz LA, Berezney R (1984) Spatial distribution of DNA loop attachment and replicational sites in the nuclear matrix. J Cell Biol 99:1794–1802

    Google Scholar 

  • Staufenbiel M, Deppert W (1984) Preparation of nuclear matrices from cultured cells: subfractionation of nuclei in situ. J Cell Biol 98:1886–1894

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka S (1990) Methods of successive multiparametric cytochemistry and microfluorometry identifies cells with special reference to cell cycle phases in a chick embryo. Exp Cell Res 186:6–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Velden HMW van der, Willigen G van, Wetzels RHW, Wanka F (1984) Attachment of origins of replication to the nuclear matrix and the chromosomal scaffold. FEBS Lett 171:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheijen R, Van Venroij W, Ramaekers F (1988) The nuclear matrix: structure and composition. J Cell Sci 90:11–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogelstein B, Pardoll DM, Coffey DS (1980) Supercoiled loops and eucaryotic DNA replication. Cell 22:79–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Zini N, Mazzotti G, Santi P, Rizzoli R, Galanzi A, Rana R, Maraldi NM (1989) Cytochemical localization of DNA loop attachment sites to the nuclear lamina and to the inner nuclear matrix. Histochemistry 91:199–204

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neri, L.M., Mazzotti, G., Capitani, S. et al. Nuclear matrix-bound replicational sites detected in situ by 5-bromodeoxyuridine. Histochemistry 98, 19–32 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00716934

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00716934

Keywords

Navigation