Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ernährungsstatus beim Oesophaguscarcinom: Erfassung und Bedeutung für eine präoperative Risikoabschätzung

Nutritional status in esophageal carcinoma: Preoperative risk evaluation

  • Originalarbeiten
  • Published:
Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a prospective study including 60 patients with esophageal carcinoma the nutritional status was evaluated by means of anthropometric, biochemical and immunological data. As a first measure of malnutrition the diminuation of each single parameter was estimated in a 10%-scale, according to this a linear rising number of points given and the sum for all 11 parameters expressed as a score (Gofferje and Fekl). Second the nutritional status was judged by the prognostic nutritional index (Buzby and Mullen). Both score and index were correlated with serious postoperative complications (wound infection, anastomotic leakage, sepsis, organ failure, death). The results show that it was not possible to assess the risk of esophagectomy preoperatively on the ground of nutritional parameters solely. The reason could be that the nutritional status was rather normal in most cases and its risk burden therefore low. In conclusion performing preoperative nutritional therapy routinely seems not to be justified.

Zusammenfassung

In einer prospektiven Untersuchung von 60 Patienten mit Oesophagus-carcinom wurde der Ernährungsstatus anhand anthropometrischer, laborchemischer und immunologischer Daten bestimmt. Nach dem Vorschlag von Gofferje und Fekl wurde jeder Einzel-parameter entsprechend seiner Minderung in 10%-Stufen gewertet und mit einer linear ansteigenden Punktezahl belegt; die Summe aller 11 Einzelwerte gilt als Maß zur Beurteilung einer bestehenden Malnutrition. Als zweites Verfahren zur Einschätzung des Ernährungsstatus wurde der PNI (prognostic nutrition index) nach Buzby und Mullen verwendet. Sowohl Score als auch Index wurden in Beziehung gesetzt zu schwerwiegenden postoperativen Komplikationen (Wundheilungs-störung, Sepsis, Organinsuffizienz, Tod). Das Ergebnis zeigt, daß eine präoperative Risikoabschätzung aufgrund von Ernährungsparametern allein nicht möglich war. Grund hierfür ist wahrscheinlich der in den meisten Fällen noch zufriedenstellende Ernährungszustand, so daß die davon ausgehende Risikobelastung zu gering war. Deshalb erscheint auch eine routinemäßige operationsvorbereitende Ernährungstherapie nicht gerechtfertigt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Studley HO (1936) Percentage of weight loss. A basic indicator of surgical risk in patients with chronic peptic ulcer. JAMA 106:458–460

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blackburn GL, Bistrian BR, Maini BS, Schlamm HT, Smith MF (1977) Nutritional and metabolic assessment of the hospitalized patient. J Parenter Nutr 1:11–22

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mullen IL, Buzby GP, Waldman MT, Gertner MH, Hobbs CL, Rosato EF (1979) Prediction of operative mortality by preoperative nutritional assessment. Surg Forum 30:80–82

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buzby GP, Mullen IL, Matthews DC, Hobbs CL, Rosato EF (1980) Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery. Am J Surg 139:160–167

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ryan JA, Taft DA (1980) Preoperative nutritional assessment does not predict morbidity and mortality in abdominal operations. Surg Forum 31:96–98

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenberg D, Silberman H, Marynink J, Ryan JA, Shoffler R, Weiss J (1980) Inapplicability of the prognostic nutritional index in critically ill patients. Surg Forum 32:109–111

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brenner U, Müller IM, Walter M, Holzmilller W, Keller HW (1986) Die Erfassung des Ernährungszustandes zur Operationsplanung. Zentralbl Chir 111:526–535

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baker JP, Detsky AS, Whitwell J, Langer B, Jeejeebhoy KN (1982) A comparison of the predictive value of nutritional assessment techniques. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 36:233–241

    Google Scholar 

  9. Simms IM, Smith IA, Woods AF (1982) A modified prognostic index based upon nutritional measurements. Clin Nutr 1:71–79

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gofferje H, Fekl W (1979) Diagnostik der Mangelernährung. Infusionstherapie 6:3–15

    Google Scholar 

  11. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Data of the 1959 build and blood pressure study. Society of Actuaries

  12. Grant IP (1980) Handbook of total parenteral nutrition. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brandmair W (1987) Habilitationsschrift TU München

  14. Roth E, Funovics J, Winter M, Schulz F, Huk I, Schemper M, Fritsch A (1982) Mangelernährung und postoperative Komplikationshäufigkeit bei Carcinompatienten. Langenbecks Arch Chir 357:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smale BF, Mullen IL, Buzby GP, Rosato EF (1981) The efficiency of nutritional assessment and support in cancer surgery. Cancer 47:2375–2381

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stein HD, Keiser HR (1971) Collagen metabolism in granulating wounds. J Surg Res 11:277–283

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cruse PIE, Foord R (1973) A five year prospective study of 23 649 surgical wounds. Arch Surg 107:206–211

    Google Scholar 

  18. Irvin TT, Goligher IC (1973) Etiology of disruption of intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg 60:461–464

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bozetti F, Terno G, Longoni C (1975) Parenteral hyperalimentation and wound healing. Surg Gynecol Obstet 141:712–714

    Google Scholar 

  20. Greenstein A, Rogers P, Moss BS and Moss G (1978) Doubled fourthday colorectal anastomotic strength with complete retention of intestinal mature wound collagen and ac celerated deposition following immediate full enteral nutrition. Surg Forum 29:78–82

    Google Scholar 

  21. Law DK, Dudrick DI, Abdon NJ (1974) The effect of dietary protein depletion on immunocompetence: The importance of nutritional repletion prior to immunologic induction. Ann Surg 179:168–173

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dionigi R, Zonta A, Dominioni L, Gnes F, Ballabio A (1977) The effects of total parenteral nutrition on immunodepression due to malnutrition. Ann Surg 185:467–474

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bistrian BR, Blackburn GL, Hallowell E (1974) Protein status of general surgical patients. J Am Med Assoc 230:858–860

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hill GI, Blackett RL, Pickford I, Burkinshaw L, Young GA, Warren IV, Schorah CJ, Morgan DB (1977) Malnutrition in surgical patients. Lancet 1:689–692

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mullen IL, Buzby GP, Matthews DC (1980) Reduction of operative morbidity and mortality by combined preoperative and postoperative nutritional support. Ann Surg 192:604–613

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brandmair, W., Lehr, L. & Siewert, J.R. Ernährungsstatus beim Oesophaguscarcinom: Erfassung und Bedeutung für eine präoperative Risikoabschätzung. Langenbecks Arch Chiv 374, 25–31 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01261932

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01261932

Key words

Navigation