Skip to main content
Log in

The differential effects of C-16,17-dihydro gibberellins and related compounds on stem elongation and flowering in Lolium temulentum

  • Published:
Planta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plants of Lolium temulentum L. cv. Ceres grown under short days (SDs) can be induced to initiate inflorescences either by exposure to one long day (LD) or by single applications of some gibberellins (GAs), which also enhance the flowering response to one LD. Single doses of up to 25 μg per plant of C-16, 17-dihydro-GA5 were about as effective as GA5 for promoting flowering after one LD but inhibited stem elongation by up to 40% over three weeks. The promotion of flowering but not the inhibition of elongation by 16, 17-dihydro-GA5 was reduced in SDs or in LDs low in far-red (FR) radiation. With shoot apices cultured in vitro, 16, 17-dihydro-GA5 was more florigenic than GA3 for apices excised after one LD of 14 h or more, but less florigenic for apices excised from plants in shorter days. 16, 17-Dihydro-GA5 was ineffective compared with GA1, GA3 and GA5 for α-amylase production by half-seeds of Lolium, a response concordant with its effect on stem elongation. As with GA5, 16, 17-dihydro derivatives of GA1, GA3, GA20 and several other GAs were more effective for flowering and less effective for stem elongation than the GAs from which they were derived. Hydroxylation at C-17 and/or C-16 generally reduced the effectiveness of 16, 17-dihydro-GA5 for flowering. These results extend the known features of GA structure which favour flowering relative to stem elongation in L. temulentum. Moreover, C-16, 17-dihydro-GA5 mimics, in its daylength- and wavelength-dependence and lack of stem elongation, characteristics of the LD stimulus in L. temulentum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FR:

far-red

GA:

gibberellin

LD:

long day

PAR:

photosynthetically active radiation

R:

red

SD:

short day

References

  • Beale, M.H., MacMillan, J. (1981) Preparation of 2- and 3-substituted gibberellins A9 and A4 for bioassay. Phytochemistry 20, 693–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian, P.W., Grove, J.F., Mulholland, T.P.C. (1967) Relationships between structure and growth promoting activity of the gibberellins and some allied compounds, in four test systems. Phytochemistry 6, 1475–1499

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrispeels, M.J., Varner, J.E. (1967) Gibberellic acid-enhanced synthesis and release of α-amylase and ribonuclease by isolated barley aleurone layers. Plant Physiol. 42, 398–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, A., Mander, L.N. (1988) Synthesis of the 12-hydroxy gibberellins GA31, GA69 and GA70. Tetrahedron Lett. 29, 2727–2730

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, A., Kuo, C.C., Durley, R.C., Pharis, R.P. (1970) The biological activities of 26 gibberellins in nine plant bioassays. Can. J. Bot. 48, 867–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L.T. (1964) Inflorescence initiation in Lolium temulentum L. V. The role of auxins and gibberellins. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 17, 10–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L.T. (1969) Inflorescence initiation in Lolium temulentum L. XIII. The role of gibberellins. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 22, 773–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L.T., King, R.W., Chu, A., Mander, L.N., Pharis, R.P. (1990) Gibberellin structure and florigenic activity in Lolium temulentum, a long-day plant. Planta 182, 96–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L.T., King, R.W., Mander, L.N., Pharis, R.P. (1993) The relative significance for stem elongation and flowering in Lolium temulentum of 3β-hydroxylation of gibberellins. Planta 192, 130–136

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R.W., Blundell, C., Evans, L.T. (1993) The behaviour of shoot apices of Lolium temulentum in vitro as the basis of an assay system for florigenic extracts. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 20, 337–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, P.S., MacMillan, J., Hutchinson, M. (1982) 1β — Hydroxy gibberellin A5. Preparation and comparison with gibberellin A3. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. I. 1982, 707–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, L., Mander, L.N., Turner, J.V. (1981) Improved procedures for the degradation of gibberellic acid. The preparation of substrates for synthetic studies. Aust. J. Chem. 34, 745–753

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, C.N., King, R.W., Evans, L.T. (1991) Floral determination and in vitro floral differentiation in isolated shoot apices of Lolium temulentum L. Planta 185, 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, R.N., Evans, L.T. (1962) Design and development of Ceres an Australian phytotron. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 7, 128–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T., Skoog, F. (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15, 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Pharis, R.P., Evans, L.T., King, R.W., Mander, L.N. (1987) Gibberellins, endogenous and applied, in relation to flower induction in the long-day plant Lolium temulentum. Plant Physiol. 84, 1132–1138

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitel, D.W., Vining, L.C. (1970). Preparation of gibberellin A1-3,4-H. Can. J. Biochem. 48, 259–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, T., Kwak, S-S., Kamiya, Y., Yamane, H., Sakurai, A., Murofushi, N., Takahashi, N. (1991) Effects of deoxygibberellin C (DGC) and 16-deoxo-DGC on gibberellin 3β-hydroxylase and plant growth. Plant Cell Physiol. 32, 239–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumiki, Y., Kawarada, A. (1961) Relation between chemical structure and physiological activity. In: Plant growth regulation, pp. 503–504, Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rheenen, V, Kelly, R.C., Cha, D.Y. (1976) An improved catalytic OsO4 oxidation of olefins to cis-1,2-glycols using tertiary amine oxides as the oxidant. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973–1976

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We are grateful to Cheryl Blundell and Bruce Twitchin for technical assistance and Dr G. Kretschmer and Prof. O. Junttila for comments on the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, L.T., King, R.W., Mander, L.N. et al. The differential effects of C-16,17-dihydro gibberellins and related compounds on stem elongation and flowering in Lolium temulentum . Planta 193, 107–114 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00191613

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00191613

Key words

Navigation