Skip to main content
Log in

Functional morphology of coronal and peristomeal podia in Sphaerechinus granularis (Echinodermata, Echinoida)

  • Published:
Zoomorphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Coronal podia of Sphaerechinus granularis are anchoring (adhering) appendages involved in either locomotion or capture of drift materials. Adhesion is not due to the presumed sucker action of the disc but relies entirely on secretions of the disc epidermis. Peristomeal podia function in wrapping together food particles or food fragments in an adhesive material thus facilitating their capture by the Aristotle's lantern. In both types of podia, the disc epidermis is made up of four cell types: non-ciliated secretory cells (NCS cells) that contain graules whose content is at least partly mucopolysaccharidic in nature, ciliated secretory cells (CS cells) containing granules of unknown nature, ciliated non-secretory cells (CNS cells) and support cells. The cilia of CS cells are subeuticular whereas those of CNS cells, although also short and rigid, traverse the cuticle and protrude in the outer medium. All these cells are presumably involved in an adhesive/de-adhesive process functioning as a duogland adhesive system. Adhesive secretion would be produced by NCS cells and de-adhesive secretion by CS cells. These secretions would be controlled through stimulations by the two types of ciliated cells (receptor cells) which presumably interact with the secretory cells by way of the nerve plexus. This model of adhesion/de-adhesion fits well with the activities of both coronal and peristomeal podia. The secretion of NCS cells would make up a bridge of adhesive material between a podium and the substratum (coronal podia) or would coat and gather food particles (peristomeal podia), respectively. The de-adhesive material enclosed in the granules of CS cells would allow the podia (either coronal or peristomeal) to easily become detached from the substratum and to always remain clear of any particles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball B, Jangoux M (1990) Ultrastructure of the tube foot sensory-secretory complex in Ophiocomina nigra (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea). Zoomorphology 109:201–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JB (1969) Feeding and the control of volume within the tests of regular sea-urchins. J Zool (London) 159:51–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke RD (1980) Podial sensory receptors and the induction of metamorphosis in echinoids. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 47:223–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron JL, Fankboner PB (1984) Tentacle structure and feeding processes in life stages of the commercial sea cucumber Parastichopus californicus (Stimpson). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 81:193–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell SS, Crawford BJ (1991) Ultrastructural study of the hyaline layer of the starfish embryo, Pisaster ochraceus. Anat Rec 231:125–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman R (1969) Ultrastructure of the tube foot sucker of a regular echinoid, Diadema antillarum Philippi, with special reference to the secretory cells. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 96:151–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Dambach M, Hentschel G (1970) Die Bedeckungsreaktion von Seeigeln. Neue Versuche und Deutungen. Mar Biol 6:135–141

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ridder C, Lawrence JM (1982) Food and feeding mechanisms: Echinoidea. In: Jangoux M, Lawrence JM (eds) Echinoderm Nutrition. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 57–115

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ridder C, Jangoux M, De Vos L (1987) Frontal ambulacral and peribuccal areas of the spatangoid echinoid Echinocardium cordatum (Echinodermata): A functional entity in feeding mechanism. Mar Biol 94:613–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich HF, Fontaine AR (1975) A decalcification method for ultrastructure of echinoderm tissues. Stain Technol 50:351–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Engster MS, Brown SC (1972) Histology and ultrastructure of the tube foot epithelium in the phanerozonian starfish, Astropecten. Tissue Cell 4:503–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenner DH (1973) The respiratory adaptations of the podia and ampullae of echinoids (Echinodermata). Biol Bull 145:323–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Flammang P, Jangoux M (1992) Functional morphology of the locomotory podia of Holothuria forskali (Echinodermata, Holothuroida). Zoomorphology 111:167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Flammang P, De Ridder C, Jangoux M (1991) Ultrastructure of the penicillate podia of the spatangoid echinoid Echinocardium cordatum (Echinodermata) with special emphasis on the epidermal sensory-secretory complexes. Acta Zool (Stockholm) 72:151–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganter P, Jollès G (1969–1970) Histochimie normale et pathologique, vols 1 et 2. Gauthiers-Villars, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelder SR, Tyler S (1986) Anatomical and cytochemical studies on the adhesive organs of the ectosymbiont Histriobdella homari (Annelida: Polychaeta). Trans Am Microsc Soc 105:348–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans CO (1983) The duo-gland adhesive system. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 21:281–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland ND, Nealson KH (1978) The fine structure of the echinoderm cuticle and the subcuticular bacteria of echinoderms. Acta Zool (Stockholm) 59:169–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence JM (1987) A functional biology of echinoderms. Croom Helm. London

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie JD (1987) The ultrastructure of the tentacles of eleven species of dendrochirote holothurians studied with special reference to surface coats and papillae. Cell Tissue Res 248:187–199

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie JD (1988) The ultrastructure of tube foot epidermal cells and secretions: Their relationship to the duo-glandular hypothesis and the phylogeny of the echinoderm classes. In: Paul CRC, Smith AB (eds) Echinoderm phylogeny and evolutionary biology. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 287–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooi R (1986) Non-respiratory podia of clypeasteroids (Echinodermata, Echinoides): II. Diversity. Zoomorphology 106:75–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols D (1961) A comparative histological study of the tube feet of two regular echinoids. Quart J Microsc Sci 102:157–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols D (1966) Functional morphology of the water-vascular system. In: Boolootian RA (ed) Physiology of Echinodermata. Interscience Publishers, New York, pp 219–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedmak JJ, Grossberg SE (1977) A rapid, sensitive, and versatile assay for protein using Coomassie Brilliant blue G250. Anal Biochem 79:544–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AB (1979) Peristomial tube feet and plates of regular echinoids. Zoomorphologie 94:67–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas LA, Hermans CO (1985) Adhesive interactions between the tube feet of a starfish, Leptasterias hexactis, and substrata. Biol Bull 169:675–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler S (1976) Comparative ultrastructure of adhesive systems in the Turbellaria. Zoomorphologie 84:1–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler S (1988) The role of function in determination of homology and convergence — examples from invertebrates adhesive organs. Fortschr Zool 36:331–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler S, Rieger GE (1980) Adhesive organs of the Gastrotricha. I. Duo-gland organs. Zoomorphologie 95:1–15

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research Assistant, National Fund for Scientific Research (Belgium)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flammang, P., Jangoux, M. Functional morphology of coronal and peristomeal podia in Sphaerechinus granularis (Echinodermata, Echinoida). Zoomorphology 113, 47–60 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430976

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430976

Keywords

Navigation