Skip to main content
Log in

Enameloid in the teleost fish Lophius

An ultrastructural study

  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The ultrastructural and chemical differences between mature enameloid and dentine in the teleost fish Lophius were demonstrated using transmission (TEM) and scanning (SEM) electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction analysis, electron diffraction analysis and electron microprobe analysis. An enameloid cap (about 50 μm thick) and a thin layer (1 μm thick) of collar enameloid were revealed in the scanning (SEM) and transmission (TEM) electron microscopes. Collar enameloid, structurally different from dentine both in SEM and TEM, proved to be less mineralized than the cap as revealed by electron microprobe analysis. The enameloid cap was seen to differ from dentine by (i) its electron density in TEM; (ii) the structural arrangement perpendicular to the underlying dentine, observed in SEM and TEM and corroborated by electron diffraction data, which showed a preferred orientation of enameloid crystallites; (iii) its higher F content decreasing gradually from the apex of the tooth to the junction with dentine and falling suddenly below this junction; and (iv) its lower Mg content. Establishment of a classification of enameloids is proposed, similar to that for dentines, in which selachian enameloid would be a reference standard.

Résumé

La microscopie électronique à transmission, la microscopie électronique à balayage, la diffraction X, la diffraction électronique et l'analyse par microsonde ont prouvé l'existence d'un émailoïde, ultrastructuralement et chimiquement différent de la dentine, chez la baudroie. La microscopie électronique à balayage et la microscopie électronique à transmission ont mis en évidence un chapeau d'émailoïde, d'environ 50 μm d'épaisseur, et une couche fine (1 μm) d'émailoïde du collet. L'émailoïde du collet, dont l'ultrastructure différente de celle de la dentine a été mise en évidence en microscopie électronique à transmission et en microscopie électronique à balayage, apparaît, après analyse par microsonde, moins minéralisé que le chapeau. Le chapeau d'émailoïde diffère de la dentine par (i) sa densité aux électrons en microscopie électronique à transmission; (ii) sa structure perpendiculaire à celle de la dentine sous-jacente, visible en microscopie électronique à transmission et en microscopie électronique à balayage et confirmée par la diffraction électronique, qui montre une orientation préférentielle des cristaux; (iii) son contenu en fluor plus élevé, qui diminue progressivement de l'apex à la jonction avec la dentine et chute brutalement au-dessous de cette jonction; (iv) sa teneur plus basse en magnésium. Les auteurs proposent que soit établie une classification des émailoïdes analogue à celle des dentines et dans laquelle l'émailoïde de Sélaciens constituerait un standard de référence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A.S.T.M. (American Society Testing Materials): X-ray powder diffraction filecard. Philadelphia. 9, 432 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery, J.W.: Dentin. In: Orban's oral histology and embryology, 8th ed, pp. 105–140 (S.N. Bhaskar, ed.). Saint Louis: Mosby 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargmann, W.: Zur Frage der Homologisierung von Schmelz und Vitrodentin. Z. Zellforsch. 27, 492–499 (1937)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brudevold, F., Gardner, D.E., Smith, F.A.: The distribution of F in human enamel. J. Dent. Res. 35, 420–429 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Daculsi, G., Kerebel, L.M.: Ultrastructural study and comparative analysis of fluoride content of enameloid in sea-water and fresh-water sharks. Arch. Oral Biol. in press (1979)

  • Daculsi, G., Kerebel, B., Le Cabellec, M.T., Kerebel, L.M.: Qualitative and quantitative data on arrested caries in dentine. Caries Res. 13, 190–202 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastoe, J.E.: The amino acid composition of proteins from the oral tissues. II: The matrix proteins in dentine and enamel from developing human deciduous teeth. Arch. Oral Biol. 8, 633–652 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Garant, P.: An electron microscopic study of the crystal matrix relationship in the teeth of the dogfish Squalus acanthias L. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 30, 441–449 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glas, J.E.: Studies on the ultrastructure of dental enamel. VI: Crystal chemistry of shark's teeth. Odontol. Revy. 13, 315–326 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Graver, H.T., Herold, R.C., Tai Young Chung, Christiner, P.J., Pappas, C., Rosenbloom, J.: Immunofluorescent localization of amelogenins in developing bovine teeth. Dev. Biol. 63, 390–401 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Herold, R.C.: Ultrastructure of odontogenesis in the pike (Esox lncius). Role of dental epithelium and formation of enameloid layer. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 48, 435–454 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Herold, R.C.: Scanning electron microscopy of enameloid and dentine in fish teeth. Arch. Oral Biol. 20, 635–640 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig, O.: Über Bau und Entwickelung der Placoidschuppen und der Zähne der Selachier. Jena. Z. Naturw. 8, 331–404 (1874)

    Google Scholar 

  • Isokawa, S., Van Huysen, G., Kosakai, T.: Historadiography of tubular enamel and dentin of osseous piscine teeth. Nihon Univ. School Dent. J. 6, 79–87 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Isokawa, S., Satomura, I., Yamaguchi, K., Yoshie, T., Morimoto, M.: Historadiographic observations on the outer dentin in certain osseous fishes. Nihon Univ. School Dent. J. 12, 1–5 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerebel, B.: L'histologie de l'émail. In: Encyclopédie médico-chirurgicale. Stomatologie, Vol. 1. Paris: Editions techniques 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerebel, B., Daculsi, G.: Ultrastructure de l'émailoïde des dents de Prionace glauca L. J. Biol. Buccale 3, 3–12 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, T.: Development and structure of some actinopterygian and urodele teeth. Proc. Zool. Soc. London. 133, 401–424 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvam, T.: The development of mesodermal enamel on piscine teeth. Kongl. Norsk. Vidensk. Selski. 23, 1–115 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvam, T.: On the development of dentin in fish. II: Teleostei. J. Dent. Res. 32, 411–419 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, G.: Etudes sur le développement des dents chez les Téléostéens. I: Les dents de substitution chez les genres Ophidium, Trigla, Rhombus, Belone. Arch. Anat. Micr. Paris. 35, 101–146 (1939a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, G.: Etudes sur le développement des dents chez les Téléostéens. II: Développement des dents-pourvues de dentine trabéculaire (Esox, Sphyraena). Arch. Anat. Micr. Paris. 35, 201–221 (1939b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, G.: Etudes sur le développement des dents chez les Téléostéens. III: Développement des dents desubstitution de Merluccius, Chrysophrys, Cepola, Lophius. Arch. Anat. Micr. Paris. 35, 415–455 (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, P.T., Glimcher, M.J., Seyer, J.M., Huddleston, J.I., Hein, J.W.: Non collagenous nature of the proteins of shark enamel. Science 145, 1192–1194 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lison, L.: Sur la nature de l'émail dentaire chez les Sélaciens. C.R. Soc. Biol. Belge. 140, 1239–1240 (1946)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lison, L.: Les dents. In: Traité de Zoologie, Vol. 12, pp. 791–853 (P.P. Grasse eds). Paris: Masson 1954

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R.: Odontography; or a treatise on the comparative anatomy of the teeth, Vol. 2, pp. 141–144 (H. Baillére, ed.). London 1840

  • Peyer, B.: Comparative odontology, (R. Zangerl, ed.). Chicago and London: The Chicago University Press 1968

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, D.F.G.: Phylogeny of tooth tissues: enameloid and enamel in recent vertebrates, with a note on the history of cementum. In: Structural and chemical organization of teeth, Vol. 1, pp. 111–149 (A.E.W. Miles, ed.). New York and London: Academic Press 1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripa, L.W., Gwinnett, A.J., Guzman, C., Legler, D.: Microstructural and microradiographic qualities of lemon shark enameloid. Arch. Oral Biol. 17, 165–173(1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Röse, C.: Über die verschiedenen Abänderungen der Hartgewebe bei niederen Wirbeltieren. Anat. Anz. 14, 21–31, 33–69 (1898)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W.J.: Faserung und Durodentin-Metaplasie bei Fischzähnen. Anat. Anz. 105, 349–359 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, WJ.: Analysis of Lophius teeth with polarized light. Ann. Zool. 3, 59–68 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W.J., Keil, A.: Polarizing microscopy of dental tissues. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellis, R.P.: A histological and histochemical study of the matrices of enameloid and dentine in teleost fishes. Arch. Oral Biol. 20, 183–187 (1975)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shellis, R.P., Miles, A.E.W.: Autoradiographic study of the formation of enameloid and dentine matrices in teleost fishes using tritiated amino acids. Proc. R. Soc. London. 185, 51–72 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomasset, J.J.: Recherches sur les tissus dentaires des Poissons fossiles. Arch. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 11, 5–153 (1930)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomes, C.S.: On the development of marsupíal and other tubular enamels with notes upon the development of enamel in general. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. 189, 107–122 (1897)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomes, C.S.: A manual of dental anatomy human and comparative, 8th ed. London: Churchill 1923

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherell, J.A., Robinson, C.: The inorganic composition of teeth. In: Biological mineralization, pp. 43–74 (I. Zipkin, ed.). New York: J. Wiley and Sons 1973

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kerebel, LM., Le Cabellec, MT. Enameloid in the teleost fish Lophius . Cell Tissue Res. 206, 211–223 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232765

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232765

Key words

Navigation