Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of fumarolic gases — boundary conditions set by measured parameters: case study at Vulcano, Italy

  • Published:
Bulletin of Volcanology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physical, chemical and isotopic parameters were measured in fumaroles at the Vulcano crater and in drowned fumaroles near the beach. The data were used to define boundary conditions for possible conceptual models of the system.Crater fumaroles: time variations of CO2 and SO2 concentrations indicate mixing of saline gas-rich water with local fresh water. Cl/Br ratios of 300– 400 favour sea-water as a major source for Cl, Brand part of the water in the fumaroles. Cl concentrations and δD values revealed, independently, amixing of 0.75 sea-water with 0.25 local freshwaterin furmarole F-5 during September 1982.Patterns of parameter correlation and mass balances reveal that CO2, S, NH3 and B originate from sources other than sea water. The CO2 value of δ13C = − 2%o favours, at least partial, origin from decomposition of sedimentary rocks rather than mantle-derived material. Radiogenic4He(1.3 × lO−3 ccSTP/g water) and radiogenic40Ar(10.6 × 10−4 ccSTP/g water) are observed, (4He/40Ar)radiogenic = 1.2, well in the range of values observed in geothermal systems.Drowned fumaroles: strongly bubbling gas at a pond and at the beachappears to have the same origin and initial compositionas the crater fumaroles (2 km away). The fumarolic gas is modified by depletion of the reactive gases, caused by dissolution in shallow-water. Atmospheric Ne, Ar, Kr and Xe are addeden route, some radiogenic He and Ar are maintained. The Vulcano system seems to be strongly influenced by the contribution of sea-water and decomposition of sedimentary rocks. Evidence of magmatic contributions is mainly derived from heat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bochsler P, Mazor E (1975) Excess of atmospheric neon in pumicefrom the Island of Lipari. Nature 257:474–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Cioni R, Corazza E, Giuliani O, Magro G (1983) Rare gases at Vulcano, Italy. In: Corazza E, Le Cloarec MF, Le Guern F,Tedesco D (eds) Report on the Field Workshop on Volcanic Gases. Internal IAVCEI Rep, 1983, 1–5

  • Cioni R, Corazza E, Magro G (1983) Data of the Vulcano workshop; Istituto di Geocronologia e Geochimica Isotopica, CNR, Pisa. Internal Rep IAVCEI

    Google Scholar 

  • Corazza E (1986) Field workshop on volcanic gases, Vulcano Italy, 1982, general report. Geothermics 15: 197–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Corazza E, Le Cloarec MF, Le Guern F, Tedesco D (eds) (1983) Report on the Field Workshop on Volcanic Gases. Int Rep, IAVCEI, 32 p

  • Goldberg ED (1963) Chemistry — the oceans as a chemicalsystem. In: Hill MN (ed) Composition of sea water, comparativeand descriptive oceanography, Vol 2 of The Sea:New York, Interscience Pub 3–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirabayashi J (1986) Sampling of fumarolic gases at Vulcano, Italy and analytical results. Geothermics 15:201–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Cloarec MF (1983) Emission of210Pb and2l0Po in fumaroles at Vulcano Italy. In: Corazza E, Le Cloarec MF, Le Guern F, Tedesco P (eds) Report on the Field Workshopon Volcanic Gases. Internal Rep, IAVCEI, 1983, 13–15

  • Martini M, Piccardi G, Cellini Legittimo P (1980) Geochemicals urveillance of active volcanoes: data on the fumaroles of Vulcano (Aeolian Islands, Italy). Bull Volcanol 43:255–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini M, Piccardi G, Cellini Legittimo P (1981) The effect ofvariations in rainfall on the chemical composition of Vulcanofumaroles, Italy. Bull Volcanol 44:109–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini M, Cellini Legittimo P, Piccardi G, Giannini G (1986) The fumaroles of Vulcano, Italy: differences in chemical compositions produced by the surface environment. Geothermics 15:206–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazor E (1979) Noble gases in a section across the vapor dominated geothermal field in Larderello, Italy. Pure Appl Geophys 117:262–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazor E (1985) Sampling of volcanic gases — the role of noble gas measurements: a case study of Vulcano. Chem Geol 49:329–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazor E, Truesdell AH (1984) Dynamics of a geothermal fieldt raced by noble gases: Cerro Prieto, Mexico. Geothermics 13:91–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinohara H, Matsuo S (1986) Results of analyses on fumarolic gases from F-l and F-5 fumaroles of Vulcano, Italy. Geothermics 15:211–215

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazor, E., Cioni, R., Corazza, E. et al. Evolution of fumarolic gases — boundary conditions set by measured parameters: case study at Vulcano, Italy. Bull Volcanol 50, 71–85 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275170

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275170

Keywords

Navigation