Skip to main content
Log in

Inconsistency of prognostic factors for post-chemotherapy nausea and vomiting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of prognostic factors have been reported to influence the probability of developing nausea and vomiting after cytotoxic chemotherapy. This study used data collected in four randomized anti-emetic trials conducted by the Clinical Trials Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC-CTG) to assess the consistency of the effects of these prognostic factors. A total of 582 patients, all of whom had received moderately emetogenic chemotherapy for the first time, but who were assigned to different anti-emetics, were included in the analysis. The major findings was that the probability of post-chemotherapy nausea and vomiting was much more strongly influenced by the type of chemotherapy given and the type of anti-emetic used than by patient (e.g., age, gender) or environmental (e.g., treatment location, time of administration) characteristics. Further, patient-related factors had different, and sometimes opposite, effects in different anti-emetic and chemotherapy subgroups. Finally, the relative potency of anti-emetics appeared to vary with chemotherapy regimens. Implications of these findings for future studies are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen RE, Blanchard EB, Ruckdeschel JC, et al (1986) Prevalence and correlates of posttreatment and anticipatory nausea and vomiting in cancer chemotherapy. J Psychosom Res 30:643–654

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fetting JH, Grochow LB, Folstein MF, et al (1982) The course of nausea and vomiting after high-dose cyclophosphamide. Cancer Treat Rep 66:1487–1493

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gail M, Simon R, (1985) Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets. Biometrics 41:361–372

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hesketh PJ, Gandara DR (1991) Serotonin antagonists: a new class of antiemetic agents. J Natl Cancer Inst 83:613–620

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hrushesky WJM, Roemeling R (1986) Chemotherpy-induced vomiting: circadian drug timing as a source of predictable within-patient variability. Cancer Treat Rep 70:1347–1348

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jones AL, Hill AS, Soukop M, et al (1991) Comparison of dexamethasone and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Lancet 338:483–487

    Google Scholar 

  7. Olver N, Simon RM, Aisner J (1986) Antiemetic studies: a methodologic discussion. Cancer Treat Rep 70:555–563

    Google Scholar 

  8. Osoba D, Erlichman C, Willan AR, et al (1988) Failure of methylprednisolone acetate to prolong the antinauseant effect intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate in patients receiving chemotherapy. Clin Invest Med 11:377–379

    Google Scholar 

  9. Osoba D, Erlichman C, Willan AR, et al (1986) Superiority of methylprednisolone sodium succinate over low dose metoclopramide HCL in the prevention of nausea and vomiting produced by chemotherapy. Clin Invest Med 9:225–231

    Google Scholar 

  10. Parikh PM, Charak BS, Banavali SD, et al (1988) A prospective, randomized double-blind trial comparing metoclopramide alone with metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in preventing emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin. Cancer 62:2263–2266

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pollera CF, Giannarelli D (1989) Prognostic factors influencing cisplatin-induced emesis. Cancer 64:1117–1122

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roila F, Tonato M, Basurto C, et al (1987) Antiemetic activity of high doses of metoclopramide combined with methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide alone in cisplatin-treated cancer patients. A randomized double-blind trial of the Italian Oncology for Clinical Research. J Clin Oncol 5:141–149

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rusthoven JJ, Pater J, Kaiser L, et al (1991) A randomized double-blinded study comparing six doses of batanopride (BMY-25801) with methylprednisolone in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2:681–686

    Google Scholar 

  14. Warr D (1991) Selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonists: a novel class of antiemetics. In: Osoba D (ed) Effect of cancer on quality of live. CRC Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  15. Warr D, Willan AR, Fine S, et al (1991) A double-blind comparison of granisetron with dexamethasone plus prochlorperazine for the prevention of nausea and emesis due to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 83:1169–1173

    Google Scholar 

  16. Willan AR, Warr D, Pater JL, Levitt M, Erlichman C, Osoba D (1991) Methodological issues and antiemetic studies. In: Osoba D (ed) Effect of cancer on quality of live. CRC Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pater, J., Slamet, L., Zee, B. et al. Inconsistency of prognostic factors for post-chemotherapy nausea and vomiting. Support Care Cancer 2, 161–166 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417474

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417474

Key words

Navigation