Abstract
A questionnaire was sent to 242 patients who had undergone treatment with yellow light (578 nm) from a copper vapour laser for a port wine stain (PWS), for facial telangiectasia (FT), or for a spider naevus (SN). The questionnaire covered the social implications of the lesion, the physical appearance of the lesion after treatment and the patient's judgement of how the treatment has affected them. Replies were received from 73% of the patients.
The replies revealed that 83% PWS, 74% FT, and 81% SN patients felt there had been an improvement in their appearance compared with 2.5% PWS, 14% FT, and 7.5% SN patients who felt that their appearance had changed for the worse. The overall impression of the treatment was also very positive, especially with PWS patients, 91% would recommend the treatment to others, 84% would have the treatment again and 60% indicated their feelings regarding their overall treatment and the effect it had on their lives was very good.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Goldman L, Dreffer R, Rockwell RJ, Perry E. Treatment of Portwine Marks by an Argon Laser.J Dermatol Surg 1976,2:385–8
Cosman B. Experience in the Argon Laser Therapy of Port Wine Stains.Plast Reconstr Surg 1980,65:119–29
Arndt KA. Treatment technics in argon laser therapy.J Am Acad Dermatol 1984,11:90–7
Touquet VLR, Carruth JAS. Review of the Treatment of Port Wine Stains with the Argon Laser.Lasers Surg Med 1984,4:191–9
Apfelberg DB, Smith T, Maser MR et al. Dot or Pontillistic Method for Improvement in Results of Hypertrophic Scarring in the Argon Laser Treatment of Portwine Hemangiomas.Lasers Surg Med 1987,6:552–8
Anderson RR and Parrish JA. Microvasculature can be selectively damaged using dye lasers.Lasers Surg Med 1981,1:263–76
Greenwald J, Rosen S, Anderson RR et al. Comparative Histological Studies of the Tunable Dye (at 577 nm) Laser and Argon Laser: The Specific Vascular Effects of the Dye Laser.J Invest Dermatol 1981,77:305–10
Tan OT, Carney M, Margolis R et al. Histologic responses of Port-wine Stains treated by Argon, Carbon Dioxide, and Tunable Dye lasers.Arch Dermatol 1986,122:1016–22
Walker EP, Butler PH, Pickering JW et al. Histology of port wine stains after copper vapour laser treatment.Br J Dermatol 1989,121:217–23
Cotterill JA. Preliminary results following treatment of vascular lesions of the skin using a continuous wave tunable dye laser which emits at 577 nm.Clin Expt Dermatol 1986,11:628–35
Tan OT, Stafford JS. Treatment of Port-Wine Stains at 577 nm: Clinical Results.Med Instru 1987,21:218–21
Garden JM, Polla LL, Tan OT. The Treatment of Portwine Stains by the Pulsed Dye Laser.Arch Dermatol 1988,124:889–96
Anderson RR, Parrish JA. The Optics of Human Skin.J Invest Dermatol 1981,77:13–19
Lahaye CTW, van Gemert MJC. Optimal laser parameters for port wine stain therapy: a theoretical approach.Phys Med Biol 1985,30:573–87
Dixon JA, Rotering RH, Huether SE. Patient's Evaluation of Argon Laser Therapy of Port Wine Stain, Decorative Tattoo, and Essential Telangiectasia.Lasers Surg Med 1984,4:181–90
Pickering JW, Walker EP, Butler PH, van Halewyn CN. Copper Vapour Laser Treatment of Port Wine Stains and Other Vascular Malformations.Br J Plas Surg, Accepted November 1989
Winkler RL, Hays WL.Statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston 1975
Lanigen SW, Cotterill JA. Psychological disabilities amongst patients with port wine stains.Br J Dermatol 1989,121:209–15
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pickering, J.W., Butler, P.H., Ring, B.J. et al. Copper vapour laser treatment of port wine stains: a patient questionnaire. Laser Med Sci 5, 43–49 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032622
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032622