Skip to main content
Log in

Agricultural area impacts within a natural area: Cades cove, a case history

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agricultural management in Cades Cove, an historic district in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, has affected natural resources both within the district and in the adjoining natural areas. Aquatic impacts of haying and cattle grazing included increases in water temperatures, turbidity, nutrient loading, and bacterial counts and decreases in benthic macroinvertebrate density and fish biomass. Wildlife populations, including groundhogs, wild turkeys, and white-tailed deer, have increased in the open fields and around the periphery of the historic district. Intensive deer foraging has removed deciduous seedlings and saplings from woodlots, lowering species diversity and favoring coniferous reproduction. Cades Cove has limestone habitats unique in the park, and both deer browse and cattle grazing may have disturbed populations of rare plant species. Effects on water quality are detectable at a campground 15 stream km from the agricultural area, and the effects of deer foraging extend about 1 km beyond the open fields.

Since “historic landscape” preservation is presently a goal of the park, managing for open vistas in Cades Cove will require some sort of continuing disturbance. Conversion of cattle pastures to hayfields would reduce aquatic impacts but the deer herd might increase as a result of reduced competition for forage. Retarding old field succession would increase populations of native plant species dependent on sunlight, but would require government-funded mowing. Other options are discussed. Completely eliminating the effects of the historic district on adjoining areas may be impossible, at least under present economic constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Amusement/Recreation Marketing Services, Inc. 1976. Visitor sampling survey, Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Final analytic report. Rep. 18 for Professional Services, Contract No. CX2000-4-0035 with the National Park Service. 210 E. 52nd St., New York, NY 10022. 88 pp.

  • Bratton, S. P. In press. Impacts of white-tailed deer on the vegetation of Cades Cove, Great Smoky Mountains National Park.In Proc. of 33rd Annual Conf. Southeastern Assoc. of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Hot Springs, Ark.

  • Brillouin, L. 1962. Science and information theory, 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York, NY 351 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burst, T. L., and M. Pelton. In press. Some population parameters of the Cades Cove deer herd, Great Smoky Mountains National Park.In Proc. of 33rd Annual Conf. Southeastern Assoc. of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Hot Springs, Ark.

  • Committee for Tennessee Rare Plants. 1978. The rare vascular plants of Tennessee. J. Tenn. Acad. Sci. 53(4): 128–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culbertson, N. 1977. Status and history of the mountain lion in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. US Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Management Report No. 15. 70 pages.

  • Devine, H. A., F. Y. Borden, and B. J. Turner. 1976. A simulation study of Cades Cove visitor vehicle flow. US Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Occasional Paper No. 4. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etnier, D. A. 1978. Report on the search for spotfin chub (Bybopsis monarcha) and smoky madtom (Naturus baileyi) on the Little Tennessee River System, North Carolina. Technical Report, Univ. Tennessee, Dept. of Zoology, Knoxville. 11 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielder, G. F. 1978. Archaeological survey of the proposed Foothills Parkway, Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Final Report on National Park Service Contract No. CX5000-4-1675. In archives, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tenn. 63 pp.

  • Fox, J. R., and M. Pelton. 1973. Observations of a white-tailed deer die-off in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Trans. Annual. Conf. Southeast Assoc. of Game and Fish Commissioners 27: 297–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldreich, E. E. 1970. Applying bacteriological parameters to receational water quality. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 62: 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, J. W. 1977. Pages 58–138in J. E. Cooper, S. S. Robinson, and J. B. Funderburg, eds. Endangered and threatened plants of North Carolina. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh. 444 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, H. L. 1962. Checklist of vascular plants of the Great Smoky Mountains. Castanea 29: 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huheey, J. E., and A. Stupka. 1967. Amphibians and reptiles of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville. 98 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. G. 1974. Preliminary report on effects of siltation on Abrams Creek and its recovery. US Fish and Wildlife Service Internal Rep., files of Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tenn. 14pp.

  • King, P. B., R. B. Neuman, and J. B. Hadley. 1968. Geology of Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tennessee and North Carolina. Geological Survey Professional Paper 587. US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 23 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, G. L., R. C. Mathews, Jr., and J. L. Klausmeyer. 1980. A survey of bacterial water quality in Abrams Creek, Great Smoky Mountains National Park. J. Tenn. Acad. Sci. 55(1): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, R. E. 1961. An annotated list of the fishes of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Tech. Rep. 25 pp.

  • Lindsay, M. M. 1976. History of the grassy balds in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. US Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Manage. Rep. No. 4. 215 pp.

  • Linzey, A. V., and D. W. Linzey. 1971. Mammals of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville. 114 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, R. C., Jr. 1978. Ecological survey of Abrams Creek in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. US Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Manage. Rep. No. 28. 195 pp.

  • Millipore Corporation. 1973. Biological analysis of water and wastewater. Application Manual AM 302, Bedford, Mass. 57 pp.

  • National Park Service. 1974. Wilderness recommendation, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, North Carolina-Tennessee. US Department of the Interior. 14 pp. + correspondence.

  • National Park Service. 1978a. Planning process guideline NPS-2 US Department of the Interior.

  • National Park Service. 1978b. Management policies, USDI National Park Service. US Department of the Interior.

  • Shields, R. A. 1977. The Cades Cove story. Great Smoky Mountains Natural History Assoc., Gatlinburg, Tenn. 116 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silsbee, D., L. A. Plastas, and H. J. Plastas. 1976. A survey of backcountry water quality in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. US Department of the Interior. National Park Service, Manage. Rep. No. 10.66 pp.

  • Stupka, A. 1963. Notes on the birds of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville. 242pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 1979. The density, distribution, and activity of woodchucks in Cades Cove, Great Smoky Mountains National Park. M.S. Thesis, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville. 73 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennessee Department of Public Health. 1973. Guidelines for effluent criteria for sewage and industrial wastewater. Nashville, TN. 13 pp.

  • Thompson, D. 1977. Memorandum to B. Evison, Aug. 24. Park files, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tenn. 1 p.

  • Whittaker, R. H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecol. Monogr. 26: 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhm, J. L., and T. C. Davis. 1968. Biological parameters for water quality criteria. Biol. Sci. 18: 477–481.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bratton, S.P., Mathews, R.C. & White, P.S. Agricultural area impacts within a natural area: Cades cove, a case history. Environmental Management 4, 433–448 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01869654

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01869654

Key words

Navigation