Summary
To optimize performance in Open-Tubular Liquid Chromatography (OTLC) it is necessary to minimize external peak broadening. To see how to reduce the external broadening an insight into its origins is required. This can be obtained by careful evaluation of experimental results with peak deconvolution methods based on the exponentially modified Gaussian model and comparison with theoretical predictions. It is assumed that the column response is Gaussian and that the responses due to the external effects are exponential.
For peak deconvolution the algorithm described by Yau was used. Simulations were carried out to check the performance of the algorithm in calculating the standard deviation and the time constant. The effects of the presence of more than one time constant and of the number of data points and their position were investigated. The limits within which reliable results can be obtained are reported.
Experimental results were obtained with laser-induced fluorescence and mass spectrometric detection. It is shown that the Yau algorithm can be used to obtain physically realistic estimates of the contribution to peak distortion in the various system components. By suitable design external effects can be reduced to the order of 1 nl and in some cases even lower limits can be reached.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A:
-
peak area
- Fc :
-
column flow-rate
- Fi :
-
split flow-rate
- Fm :
-
make-up flow-rate
- K:
-
injection profile factor (1–12)
- Tr :
-
peak retention time
- Vinj :
-
effective injection volume
- Vchamber :
-
volume of a mixing chamber
- σ:
-
peak standard deviation
- σy :
-
peak standard deviation, calculated with the peak deconvolution program
- σ 2tot :
-
total peak variance of a chromatographic peak
- σ 2col :
-
peak variance due to the open tubular column
- σ 2j :
-
peak variance due to a system component i.
- τ:
-
overall time constant, as given by eq. (7)
- τi :
-
time constant due to system component i.
- τy :
-
overall time constant, calculated with the peak deconvolution program
References
J. L. DiCesare, M. W. Dong, J. G. Atwood, J. Chromatogr.217, 369 (1981).
R. P. W. Scott, C. F. Simpson, J. Chromatogr. Sci.20, 62 (1982).
F. Y. Yang, J. Chromatogr. Sci.20, 241 (1982).
J. C. Sternberg, Adv. Chromatogr.2, 205 (1966).
P. T. Kissinger, L. J. Felice, D. J. Miner, C. R. Preddy, R. E. Shoup, in ‘Contemporary topics in analytical and clinical chemistry’, vol. 2,D. M. Hercules, G. M. Hieftje, L. R. Snyder andM. A. Evenson, eds., Plenum Press, 1978, NY, USA; pag. 55–175.
M. Martin, C. Eon, G. Guiochon, J. Chromatogr.108, 229 (1975).
H. Poppe, Anal. Chim. Acta114, 59 (1980).
H. H. Lauer, G. P. Rozing, Chromatographia14, 641 (1981).
H. Poppe, Anal. Chim. Acta145, 17 (1983).
K.-P. Hupe, R. J. Jonker, G. Rozing, J. Chromatogr.285, 253 (1984).
V. Maynard, E. Grushka, Anal. Chem.44, 1427 (1972).
R. E. Pauls, L. B. Rogers, Anal. Chem.49, 625 (1977).
J. J. Kirkland, W. W. Yau, H. J. Stoklosa, C. H. Dilks Jr., J. Chromatogr. Sci.15, 303 (1977).
H. P. M. van Vliet, H. Poppe, Submitted for publication.
W. M. A. Niessen, H. Poppe, in preparation.
W. M. A. Niessen, H. Poppe, J. Chromatogr.323, 37 (1985).
J. H. Knox, M. T. Gilbert, J. Chromatogr.186, 405 (1979).
J. P. Foley, J. G. Dorsey, J. Chromatogr. Sci.22, 40 (1984).
M. J. E. Golay, in ‘Gas Chromatography 1958’,D. H. Desty, ed., Butterworth, 1959, London, UK; pag. 36.
B. A. Bidlingmeyer, F. V. Warren, Jr, Anal. Chem.56, 1582A (1984).
W. W. Yau, Anal. Chem.49, 395 (1977).
E. Grushka, M. N. Myers, P. D. Schettler, J. C. Giddings, Anal. Chem.41, 889 (1969).
J. P. Foley, J. G. Dorsey, Anal. Chem.55, 730 (1983).
R. Delley, Chromatographia18, 374 (1984).
D. J. Anderson, R. R. Walters, J. Chromatogr. Sci.22, 353 (1984).
H. P. M. van Vliet, W. M. A. Niessen, S. van der Linde, J. C. Kraak, H. Poppe, in preparation.
H. P. M. van Vlieth, G. Bruin, J. C. Kraak, H. Poppe, in preparation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niessen, W.M.A., van Vliet, H.P.M. & Poppe, H. Studies on external peak broadening in open-tubular liquid chromatography systems using the exponentially modified Gaussian model. Chromatographia 20, 357–363 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02269062
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02269062