Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T17:33:46.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Brazil after the Paraguayan War: Six Years of Conflict, 1870–6

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Extract

Early in 1869, when the flags of Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay were unfurled from the turrets of Asunción, the capital of Paraguay, an end to the horrors of the Paraguayan War was at last in sight. The conflict between Paraguay on the one hand, and Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay on the other, had raged for five years, since 1865, destroying human lives and material wealth. The fighting came to an official end with the death of Francisco Solano López, dictator of Paraguay, on 1 March 1870.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Partridge, James R. to Hamilton Fish, 10 June 1875, No. 258, No. Separate, Despatches from United States Ministers to Brazil (hereafter DUSMB), Record Group 59, No. 521, roll 44, volume 42.Google Scholar

2 Williams, Mary W., The People and Politics of Latin America (New York, Ginn and Company, 1938), p. 676.Google Scholar

3 Henry T. Blow to Hamilton Fish, 24 March 1870, No. 61, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll 38, volume 36.Google Scholar

4 Henry T. Blow to Baron Cotegipe, 12 April 1870, unnumbered, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll 38, volume 36.Google Scholar

5 Henry T. Blow to Hamilton Fish, 24 March 1870, No. 61, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll 38, volume 36.Google Scholar

7 Bailey, Helen Miller and Nasatir, Abraham P., Latin America: The Development of its Civilization (New Jersey, Prentice Hall Inc.), p. 425.Google Scholar

8 James R. Partridge to Hamilton Fish, 22 Feb. 1872, No. 56, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll 41, volume 39.Google Scholar

10 New York Times, 12 July 1872.Google Scholar

11 Ibid., 24 Aug. 1872.

12 James R. Partridge to Hamilton Fish, 22 Feb. 1872, No. 56, DUSMB, Record Group 59. No. 121, roll 41, volume 3.Google Scholar

13 Idem to idem, 10 April 1872, No. 60, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll 41, volume 39.Google Scholar

15 Williams, op. cit., p. 676.Google Scholar

16 Hamilton Fish to James R. Partridge, 20 April 1872, No. 61, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 77, roll 24, volume 16.Google Scholar

18 James R. Partridge to Hamilton Fish, 16 June 1872, No. 66, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll 45, volume 39.Google Scholar

19 New York Times, 13 July 1872.Google Scholar

20 James R. Partridge to Hamilton Fish, 16 June 1872, No. 66 DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll 41, volume 39.Google Scholar

21 Idem to idem, 18 July 1872, No. 69 DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll 42, volume 40.Google Scholar

22 Richard Cutts Shannon to Hamilton Fish, 24 Sept. 1872, No. 79, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll 42, volume 40.Google Scholar

24 Hale, Charles, Acting Secretary, to Mr. Shannon, 25 Sept. 1872, No. 72, Despatches from the Department of State, No. 77, roll 24, volume 16.Google Scholar

25 Richard Cutts Shannon to Hamilton Fish, 23 Nov. 1872, No. 84, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll 42, volume 40.Google Scholar

26 Idem to idem, 24 Nov. 1873, No. 48, in ibid.

27 Señor Carlos Tejedor to Baron de Araguaya, 3 Nov. 1873, No. 48, Found under Enclosure-Desparches Translated, No. 48, No. 121, roll 42, volume 40.Google Scholar

28 Richard Cutts Shannon to Hamilton Fish, 15 Jan. 1874, No. 50, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll 42, volume 40.Google Scholar

29 Richard Cutts Shannon to the Department of State, 23 July 1874, No. 148, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll 3, volume 48.Google Scholar

31 Richard Cutts Shannon to Hamilton Fish, 15 Jan. 1874, No. 50, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll 42, volume 40.Google Scholar

32 James R. Partridge to Hamilton Fish, 24 March 1874, No. 55, DUSMB,Google Scholar in ibid.

34 Idem to idem, 9 April 1874, No. 365, DUSMB, in ibid.

35 Idem to idem, 9 April 1874, No. 165, DUSMB, in ibid.

36 Idem to idem, 24 March 1874, No. 164, DUSMB, in ibid.

37 Idem to idem, 9 April 1874, No. 165, DUSMB, in ibid.

39 James R. Partridge to Hamilton Fish, 24 April 1874, No. 58, Foreign – State Papers, Volume 1874 (Government Printing Office, 1910).

40 Idem to idem, 24 April 1974, No. 172, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 323, roll volume 41.

41 Idem to idem, 7 May 1874, No. 174, DUSMB, in ibid.

44 James R. Partridge to Hamilton Fish, 24 Oct. 1874, No. 208, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll 3, volume 41.Google Scholar

46 James R. Partridge to Hamilton Fish, 21 Feb. 1874, No. 234,Google Scholar in ibid.

48 James R. Partridge to Hamilton Fish, 24 March 1875, No. 244, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll volume 41.Google Scholar

49 Idem to idem, 24 A 1875, No. 249, In ibid.

51 James R. Partridge to Hamilton Fish, 24 March 1876, No. 317, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll volume 42.Google Scholar

52 Idem to idem, 1 May 1875, No. 251, DUSMB, in ibid.

53 Idem to idem, 22 May 1875, No. 255, in ibid.

54 James R. Partridge to Hamilton Fish, 10 June 1875, No. 258, No. Separate, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll 4, volume 42.Google Scholar

57 James R. Partridge to Hamilton Fish, 23 July 1875, No. 270, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll volume 42.Google Scholar

58 Idem to idem, 23 June 1875, No. 265, In ibid.

62 James R. Partridge to Hamilton Fish, 23 June 1875, No. 265, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll volume 42.Google Scholar

63 Idem to idem, 9 July 1875, unnumbered, in ibid.

64 Idem to idem, 9 July 1875 No. 267, in ibid.

67 James R. Partridge to Hamilton Fish, 24 April 1875, No. 249, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 121, roll, volume 42.Google Scholar

68 Idem to idem, 15 Feb. 1876, No. 311, in ibid.

70 James R. Partridge to Hamilton Fish, 24 March 1876, No. 317, DUSMB, Record Group 59, No. 127, roll volume 42.Google Scholar

71 Idem to idem, 30 Dec. 1876, No. 355, in ibid.

72 Williams, op. cit., p. 676.Google Scholar