Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T15:25:59.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ministerial Reshuffles and the Civil Service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

R. K. Alderman  and
J. A. Cross
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The relationship between ministers and the senior civil servants with whom they are in closest contact has long fascinated students of British government. For all the attention lavished on it, however, the relationship remains obstinately elusive and unsusceptible to clear categorization and analysis. The problem is partly one of finding a suitable frame of reference. Despite their well-established limitations, the Weberian model of an instrumental bureaucracy and the closely-related ‘politics-administration dichotomy’ still loom surprisingly large in academic analyses of bureaucratic behaviour. But the attempt to specify roles appropriate to civil servants, on the one hand, or ministers, on the other, runs the risk either of proving inadequate in face of the empirical evidence or of leading to the conclusion that one of the groups – usually the civil servants – is usurping the other's role or roles. Elements of the latter can be seen in the concern evinced in recent years about the power of civil servants vis-à-vis ministers in Britain. (Discussion of minister-civil servant relationships has, indeed, been almost entirely confined to aspects of power – particularly that of the minister's ability to get his way on policy.)

Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 41 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Curiously, the rough American equivalent of this relationship – that between appointed political executives and the highest (‘super-grade’) U.S. career civil servants – seems to have remained largely unexamined by American political scientists until the publication of Heclo's, HughA Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in Washington (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1977).Google Scholar

2 Shore, Peter, Entitled to Know (London: MacGibbon and Kee, 1966), p. 155Google Scholar; Party, Labour, The Fulton Committee on the Civil Service: Labour Party Evidence (London: Labour Party, 1967), p. 8.Google Scholar

3 Wolff, Michael, ‘The New Shift of Power to the Bureaucrats’, The Times, 27 05 1976.Google Scholar

4 Expenditure Committee, Sessions 1975–76 and 1976–77, Report, Eleventh, The Civil Service (London: HMSO, HC 535–1, 1977).Google Scholar

5 Grossman, Richard, The Diaries of a Cabinet Minister, Volume III: Secretary of State for Social Services 1968–70 (London: Hamish Hamilton and Jonathan Cape, 1977), p. 78.Google Scholar

6 Crowther-Hunt, Lord, ‘Whitehall – just passing through’, The Listener, 16 12 1976, p. 773Google Scholar; King, Anthony, ‘Britain's Ministerial Turnover’, New Society, 18 08 1966, p. 258.Google Scholar

7 Castle, Barbara, ‘Mandarin Power‘, Sunday Times, 11 06 1973.Google Scholar

8 Crossman, Richard, Inside View: Three Lectures on Prime Ministerial Government (London: Jonathan Cape, 1972), pp. 15–16.Google Scholar

9 Wolff, Michael, ‘The Stresses of Being a Cabinet Minister’, The Times, 25 05 1976.Google Scholar

10 Crowther-Hunt, , ‘Whitehall – just passing through’, p. 773.Google Scholar

11 While both authors have had contacts with the civil service over many years they have based the present article on an examination of a wide variety of secondary sources rather than on any specific interview material.

12 Guardian, 13 10 1976.Google Scholar

13 Fay, Stephen and Young, Hugo, The Fall of Heath (London: Sunday Times reprint, 1976), p. 18.Google Scholar

14 Boyle, Edward, Crosland, Anthony and Kogan, Maurice, The Politics of Education (London: Penguin, 1971), pp. 88–9Google Scholar; Crossman, Richard, The Diaries of a Cabinet Minister, Volume I: Minister of Housing 1964–66 (London: Hamish Hamilton and Jonathan Cape, 1975), p. 22.Google Scholar

15 SirParrott, Cecil, ‘Foreign Secretaries’, The Listener, 18 04 1968, p. 495.Google Scholar

16 Guardian, 5 08 1976Google Scholar; The Times, 21 08 1976Google Scholar; Financial Times, 21 09 1976Google Scholar; Guardian, 25 11 1976Google Scholar; The Observer, 2 01 1977.Google Scholar

17 Guardian, 10 02 1974.Google Scholar

18 Sunday Times, 9 01 1966.Google Scholar

19 Crossman, , Diaries, Vol. I, p. 395.Google Scholar

20 Crowther-Hunt, , ‘Whitehall-just passing through’, p. 773.Google Scholar

21 ‘Mr. Crosland's Legacy’, New Statesman, 16 04 1976, p. 487Google Scholar; The Times, 16 07 1976Google Scholar; Guardian, , 1 09 1976Google Scholar; Sunday Times, 20 March 1977.

22 Crossman, , Diaries, Vol. I, p. 181.Google Scholar

23 Dalton, Hugh, Call Back Yesterday: Memoirs 1887–1931 (London: Frederick Muller, 1953), p. 218Google Scholar and High Tide and After: Memoirs 1945–1960 (London: Frederick Muller, 1962), p. 15.Google Scholar

24 Dalton, , Call Back Yesterday, pp. 218–19Google Scholar and The Fateful Years: Memoirs 1931–1945 (London: Frederick Muller, 1957), p. 328.Google Scholar

25 Donoughue, Bernard and Jones, G. W., Herbert Morrison: Portrait of a Politician (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1973), p. 513.Google Scholar

26 Crossman, , Diaries, Vol. I, p. 453Google Scholar; Guardian, 4 11 1972.Google Scholar

27 Donoughue, and Jones, , Herbert Morrison, p. 513Google Scholar; Boyle, , Crosland, and Kogan, , Politics of Education, p. 49.Google Scholar

28 Boyle, , Crosland, and Kogan, , Politics of Education, pp. 155–6.Google Scholar

29 Moonman, Eric, MP, ‘Teaching Government Ministers how to do their jobs properly’, The Times, 25 04 1977.Google Scholar

30 Harvey, John, ed., The Diplomatic Diaries of Oliver Harvey 1937–40 (London: Collins, 1970), p. 100.Google Scholar

31 Headey, Bruce, British Cabinet Ministers: The Roles of Politicians in Executive Office (London: Allen and Unwin, 1974), pp. 44–5.Google Scholar

32 Headey, , British Cabinet Ministers, pp. 34–5, 115–16.Google Scholar

33 The Times, 20 01 1967.Google Scholar

34 Brown, George, In My Way (London: Gollancz, 1971), p. 162.Google Scholar

35 SirPlayfair, Edward, ‘Who Are the Policy-Makers?’, Public Administration, XLIII (1965), 260–74, p. 265.Google Scholar

36 Donoughue, and Jones, , Morrison, p. 511.Google Scholar

37 Brown, George, ‘Why I Shocked the Foreign Office Mandarins’, Sunday Times, 7 04 1968.Google Scholar

38 Crossman, , Diaries, Vol. I, pp. 116, 618.Google Scholar

39 Woolton, Lord, The Memoirs of the Rt. Hon. the Earl of Woolton (London: Cassell, 1959), p. 202.Google Scholar

40 Boyle, , Crosland, and Kogan, . Politics of Education, pp. 181–2.Google Scholar Crossman, on the other hand, complained that he had no influence on any promotion below permanent secretary at Housing and Local Government (Diaries, Vol. I, p. 621).Google Scholar

41 Goldsworthy, D., Colonial Issues in British Politics 1945–1951 (London: Oxford University Press, 1970), p. 51.Google Scholar

42 Cross, J. A., Sir Samuel Hoare (London: Jonathan Cape, 1977), p. 281Google Scholar; Goldsworthy, , Colonial Issues, p. 51Google Scholar; Brown, , In My Way, p. 130Google Scholar; MacDermott, Geoffrey, The New Diplomacy and its Apparatus (London: Ward Lock, 1973), pp. 175–6Google Scholar; Crossman, , Diaries, Vol. I, p. 464.Google Scholar

43 Crossman, , Diaries, Vol. I, pp. 419–20, 427, 436, 469–70, 621.Google Scholar

44 Guardian, 6 01 1966Google Scholar; Sunday Times, 9 01 1966Google Scholar; The Observer, 13 and 20 02, 1966.Google Scholar

45 The Times, 20 01 1967.Google Scholar

48 Guardian, 6 01 1966Google Scholar; Sunday Times, 9 01 1966.Google Scholar

47 Boyle, , Crosland, and Kogan, , Politics of Education, pp. 31–2.Google Scholar

48 Guardian, 7 01 1967.Google Scholar

49 On junior ministers generally, see Headey, , British Cabinet Ministers, pp. 104–7Google Scholar; on officials' attitudes to junior ministers with specific tasks, see Young, Wayland, Preservation (London: Temple Smith, 1972), pp. 79–82.Google Scholar

50 The Times, 10 05 1972Google Scholar; Draper, Paul, Creation of the DOE (London: Civil Service Studies No. 4, HMSO, 1977), p. 5.Google Scholar

51 SirClarke, Richard, New Trends in Government (London: HMSO, 1971), p. 3.Google Scholar

52 .The Times, 11 04 1972.Google Scholar

53 Roy, Amit, ‘Why was Lyon sacked?’, The Spectator, 15 05 1976.Google Scholar

54 Sunday Times, 7 04 1968Google Scholar; The Times, 10 05 1972 and 18 05 1977.Google Scholar

55 ‘Talking Politics’, BBC Radio 4, 16 04 1977.Google Scholar

56 Boyle, , Crosland, and Kogan, , Politics of Education, p. 165Google Scholar; New Statesman, 13 11 1970Google Scholar (letter from Michael Stewart); Fielding, Rodney, The Making of Labour's Foreign Policy (London: Fabian Society, 1975), p. 7.Google Scholar

57 Guardian, 5 07 1966.Google Scholar

58 Goldsworthy, , Colonial Issues, pp. 14–15, 133–5.Google Scholar

59 The Times, 23 12 1966.Google Scholar

60 Boyle, , Crosland, and Kogan, , Politics of Education, p. 185Google Scholar; The Observer, 2 01 1977Google Scholar; Guardian, 7 06 1977.Google Scholar

61 Hennessy, Peter, ‘Turning Parliamentary Spotlight on Government's Special Advisers’, The Times, 26 01 1976Google Scholar; Young, Hugo, ‘How Whitehall's Mandarins Tamed Labour's 38 Special Advisers’, Sunday Times, 19 09 1976Google Scholar; Smith, Geoffrey, ‘The Problems of Outsiders in Government’, The Times, 29 09 1977.Google Scholar For a detailed discussion of the functions of special advisers, see Klein, Rudolf and Lewis, Janet, ‘Advice and Dissent in British Government: The Case of the Special Advisers’, Policy and Politics, vi (1977), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

62 SirAllen, Douglas, ‘Ministers and Mandarins’, Government and Opposition, xii (1977), pp. 143–4.Google Scholar

63 See, for example, Sunday Times, 19 09 1976Google Scholar and Guardian, 12 12 1976.Google Scholar

64 Dalton, , High Tide and After, p. 20.Google Scholar

65 Sunday Times, 5 10 1975 (interview with Lady Sharp).Google Scholar

66 The Observer, 27 03 1977 (Kenneth Harris interview with Healey).Google Scholar

67 Donoughee, and Jones, , Herbert Morrison, p. 512Google Scholar; Walker, Patrick Gordon, ‘On Being a Cabinet Minister’, in Rose, Richard, Policy-Making in Britain (London: Macmillan, 1969), p. 118.Google Scholar

68 Sunday Times, 5 10 1975.Google Scholar Crossman's attitude is represented in the present Labour Government most notably by Tony Benn. See the remarks of a deputy secretary (Benn being cited as the most obvious case of a minister who has ‘made it plain that they don't really have confidence’in civil servants) quoted by Turner, Graham in Sunday Telegraph, 1 05 1977.Google Scholar

69 Crossman, , Diaries, Vol. I, p. 519.Google Scholar

70 Middlemas, Keith, The Diplomacy of Illusion (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1972), pp. 70–9.Google Scholar

71 McKie, David, A Sadly Mismanaged Affair (London: Croom Helm, 1973), p. 130.Google Scholar

71 Chapman, Brian, The Profession of Government (London: Allen and Unwin, 1959).Google Scholar

73 Walker, Nigel, Morale in the Civil Service (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1961), p. 63.Google Scholar

74 SirBoyle, Edward, ‘Who are the Policy-Makers?’, Public Administration, XLIII (1965), 251–9, p. 252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

75 Dalton, , High Tide and After, pp. 350–1.Google Scholar For evidence of the continued importance of this aspect of ministerial status, ‘invisible to the public eye but critical in the Whitehall power game’, see Turner, Graham, ‘Whitehall at its Wits End’, Sunday Telegraph, 24 04 1977.Google Scholar On the other hand, as Crossman has pointed out, the change from a non-Cabinet departmental head to one inside the Cabinet can involve considerable extra work, especially for the minister's private office. Crossman, , Diaries, Vol. III, pp. 251–2.Google Scholar

76 Times Educational Supplement, 13 06 1975.Google Scholar

77 Guardian, 15 09 1976.Google Scholar

78 The Times, 14 09 1976.Google Scholar

79 Boyle, , Crosland, and Kogan, , Politics of Education, p. 80.Google Scholar

80 Crossman, , Diaries, Vol. I, p. 569.Google Scholar

81 Crossman, , Diaries, Vol. I, p. 45.Google Scholar

82 Guardian, 17 06 1975.Google Scholar

83 Party, Labour, Fulton Committee, p. 8.Google Scholar

84 Boyle, , Crosland, and Kogan, , Politics of Education, p. 42.Google Scholar The distinction between policy formulation and policy decision is clearly put by Johnson, Nevil, ‘Who are the Policy-Makers?’, Public Administration, XLIII (1965), 281–7, pp. 282–3.Google Scholar

85 Lord Bridges, quoted by Johnson, , ‘Who are the Policy-Makers?’, p. 284.Google Scholar

86 Boyle, , Crosland, and Kogan, , Politics of Education, pp. 182–3.Google Scholar McKie, in his study of this case, comments: ‘It is simpler for an incoming minister to do this kind of thing to his staff than it is for a minister who has already played his way in. No carefully built bank of trust stands to be sacrificed’ (Sadly Mismanaged Affair, p. 130).Google Scholar

87 Donoughue, and Jones, , Herbert Morrison, p. 513Google Scholar; Fitzsimons, M. A., The Foreign Policy of the Labour Government 1945–1951 (Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1953), p. 151.Google Scholar

88 Macmillan, Harold, Tides of Fortune 1945–1955 (London: Macmillan, 1969), p. 692.Google Scholar

89 Guardian, 1 03 1977 (interview with Barbara Castle).Google Scholar