Abstract
PERMIT me to thank Prof. Tait for his kind and amusing criticism of my little book. I am struck with comic horror at the thought that anything in the preface can be construed into a comparison between works like Thomson and Tait, Clerk-Maxwell and W. K. Clifford, with such elementary picture-books as Deschanel and Ganot. I do not indeed share Prof. Tait's contempt for these “foreign” books; a student will find in them details, about (say) barometers or air-pumps, for which he may search the other works mentioned in vain. I did not urge students to read Thomson and Tait, because to those who can the advice is superfluous; to those who cannot it is disheartening. I did, and do, recommend such junior students as we get at provincial colleges to read easy works on Physics—not always because they contain a profound and satisfactory statement of principles, for how few of them do, but because they explain a multitude of details and experimental developments with which it was unwise to encumber a little book dealing mainly with vital principles, and aiming at being, in its humble way, an introduction to the classics of the science.
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LODGE, O. Lodge's “Mechanics”. Nature 33, 80 (1885). https://doi.org/10.1038/033080b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/033080b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.