Skip to main content
Log in

Individual differentiation in behaviour of honey bee workers (Apis meltifera L.)

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Behavioural differentiation in honey bee workers has been the most important issue in papers on honey bee behaviour throughout the years. However, little is yet known about proximate factors leading to behavioural differentiation within worker honey bees of the same age group (idiosyncrasy). Although recently there have been many publications concerning the influence of genetic and physiological factors on worker behaviour, these factors do not provide proximate clues at the level of an individual. The aim of this paper is to describe behavioural differentiation within one age group of honey bee workers. These descriptions for more or less normal situations are necessary in order to make investigations with respect to the proximate factors leading to idiosyncrasy possible. Various methods have to be employed to describe and quantify these differences. The analysis of frequency distributions of involvement in a behaviour alone is usually not enough for this purpose.

Significant idiosyncrasy has been found for “comb construction”, “allogrooming” and some behavioural acts which occur in queenless colonies: “involvement in aggressive interactions” (both as “aggressor” and as “victim”) and “staying in empty cells”. The distribution of the number of times workers were allogroomed never deviated from random distributions. Also workers' “involvement in visiting larvae in emergency queen cells” was mostly random.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, M., J. L. Deneubourg and J. M. Pasteels, 1984. Idiosyncrasie lors du déménagement deMyrmica rubra (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Actes Coll. Insectes Soc. 1:19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, J. van der, 1990. Division of labour within one age group of honey bee workers (Apis mellifera).Actes Coll. Insectes Soc. 6:139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, J. van der, 1991. Social regulation of egg-laying by queenless honey bee workers (Apis mellifera L.).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29:341–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, J. van der, 1992. An analysis of queen attending by worker honey bees.Ins. Soc. 39:237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, J. van der, 1993. “Division of labour” in honeybees: a revision.Proc. Exper. & Appl. N.E.V. 4:91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetsma, J. and A. ten Houten, 1974. Effects of juvenile hormone analogues in the food of honey bee colonies.Z. angew. Entomol. 77:292–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderone, N. W. and R. E. Page, 1991. Evolutionary genetics of division of labor in colonies of the honey bee (Apis mellifera).Am. Nat. 138:69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneubourgh, J. -L., S. Goss, J. M. Pasteels, D. Fresneau and J. -P. Lachaud, 1987. Self organisation mechanisms in ant societies (II): learning and foraging in division of labour. In: Pasteels, J. M. and Deneubourgh, J. -L. (Eds.):From individual to collective behaviour in social insects. Experientia (Suppl.) 54:177–196.

  • Fergusson, L. A. and M. L. Winston, 1987. The influence of wax deprivation on temporal polyethism in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies.Can. J. Zool. 66:1997–2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluri, P., M. Lüscher, H. Wille and L. Gerig, 1982. Changes in weight of the pharyngeal gland and haemolymph titers of juvenile hormone, protein and vitellogenin in worker honey bees.J. Insect Physiol. 28:61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, K. von, 1965.Tanzsprache und Orientierung der Bienen. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, B., 1979.Bumblebee economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogeweg, P. and B. Hesper, 1981. The ontogeny of the interaction structure in bumble bee colonies: a MIRROR model.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 12:271–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaycox, E. R., 1976. Behavioral changes in worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) after injection with synthetic juvenile hormone (Hymenoptera, Apidae).J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 49:165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaycox, E. R., W. Skowronek, G. Gwynn, 1974. Behavioral changes in worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) induced by injections of a juvenile hormone mimic.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 67:529–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanne, R. L. (Ed.), 1988.Interindividual behavioral variability in social insects. Westview Press, Boulder & London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmes, S. A., 1985. A quantitative study of the division of labour among worker honey bees.Z. Tierpsychol. 68:287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmes, S. A., 1989. Grooming specialists among worker honey bees.Apis mellifera. Anim. Behav. 37:1048–1049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmes, S. A., 1990. Recent progress in the study of adaptive behavioural flexibility in honey bees.Bee World 71:122–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. T., 1980.Statistical methods for survival data analysis. Lifetime learning publications. Belmont, California, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, A., 1987. Factors determining polyethism in social insects. In: J. M. Pasteels and J. -L. Deneubourgh (Eds.):From individual to collective behavior in social insects. Experientia (Suppl.) 54:219–241.

  • Lindauer, M., 1952. Ein Beitrag zur Arbeitsteilung im Bienenstaat.Z. verg. Physiol. 34:299–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, J. K., 1989. The analysis of categorical data using GLIM.Lecture notes in statistics 56:1–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, R., 1985. Learning in honey bees in an ecological and behavioral context. In: B. Hölldobler and M. Lindauer (Eds.)Experimental and behavioural ecology and sociobiology. Sunderland MA: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener, C. D., 1974.The social behaviour of the bees: a comparative study. Belknap/Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A. J., M. D. Breed and M. J. Moor, 1987. The guard honey bee: ontogeny and behavioural variability of workers performing a specialized task.Anim. Behav. 35:1159–1167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, R. E. and G. E. Robinson, 1991. The genetics of division of labour in honey bee colonies.Adv. Insect Physiol. 33:117–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasteels, J. M. and J. -L. Deneubourgh (Eds.), 1987:From individual to collective behaviour in social insects. Experientia (Suppl) 54.

  • Plowright, R. C. and C. M. S. Plowright, 1988. Elitism in social insects: a positive feedback model. In: Jeanne, R. L. (Ed.), 1988.Interindividual behavioral variability in social insects. Westview Press, Boulder & London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. E., 1987. Regulation of honey bee age polyethism by juvenile hormone.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20:329–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. E., 1992. Regulation of division of labor in insect societies.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37:637–665.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. E., R. E. Page, C. Strambi, A. Strambi, 1989. Hormonal and genetic control of behavioural integration in honey bee colonies.Science 246:109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rösch, G. A., 1925. Untersuchungen über die Arbeitsteilung im Bienenstaat, I. Teil: Die Tätigkeiten im normalen Bienenstaate und ihre Beziehung zum Alter der Arbeitsbienen.Z. verg. Physiol. 2:571–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rösch, G. A., 1930. Untersuchungen über die Arbeitsteilung im Bienenstaat, II. Teil: Die Tätigkeiten der Arbeitsbienen unter experimentell veränderten Bedingungen.Z. verg. Physiol. 12:1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutz, W., L. Gerig, H. Wille and M. Lüscher, 1974. A bioassay for juvenile hormone (JH) effects of insect growth regulators (IGR) on adult worker honey bees.Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 47:307–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutz, W., L. Gerig, H. Wille and M. Lüscher, 1976. The function of juvenile hormone in adult worker honey bees,Apis mellifera.J. Insect Physiol. 22:1485–1491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami, S. F., 1953. Untersuchungen über die Arbeitsteilung in einem Zwergvolk der Honigbiene: Beiträge zur Biologie des Bienenvolkes,Apis mellifera L.Jap. J. Zool. 11:117–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D. and S. A. Kolmes, 1991. Age polyethism for hive duties in honey bees — illusion or reality?Ethology 87:284–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D., 1982. Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honey bee colonies.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11:287–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visscher, P. K., 1983. The honey bee way of death: necrophoric behaviour inApis mellifera colonies.Anim. Behav. 31:1070–1076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, R. H., 1981. Social structure and individual ontogenies: problems of description, mechanisms and evolution.Perspectives in Ethology 4:105–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, M. L., 1987.The biology of the honey bee. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, M. L. and L. A. Fergusson, 1985. The effect of worker loss on temporal caste structure in colonies of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.).Can. J. Zool. 63:777–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, M. L. and L. A. Fergusson, 1986. The influence of the amount of eggs and larvae in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies on temporal division of labor.J. Apic. Res. 25:238–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, M. L. and E. N. Punnett, 1982. Factors determining temporal division of labor in honey bees.Can. J. Zool. 60:2947–2952.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Blom, J. Individual differentiation in behaviour of honey bee workers (Apis meltifera L.). Ins. Soc 40, 345–361 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01253898

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01253898

Key words

Navigation