Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of drilling parameters on bone

Part I General healing response

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

For biocompatibility evaluation, orthopaedic and dental biomaterials are often implanted into bone after drilling. Bone repair in the drilled hole may be affected by bone damage attributed to drilling, thus influencing the bone response to biomaterials. The drilling parameters (the speed of rotation and irrigation) were investigated histologically. Three holes were drilled in each rabbit tibia with different conditions; three speeds (200, 500 and 5000 r.p.m.) and the use of central irrigation or not. Rabbits were killed immediately, 3 days, 2 weeks or 4 weeks post-operatively. India ink was injected in several rabbits just after drilling to investigate the extent of local ischaemia. The drilling quality was evaluated with regard to hole geometry, initial thermal damage and later bone healing process. For 500 or 200 r.p.m. the initial thermal damage, shown by the degree of ischaemia, was less than for 5000 r.p.m. drilling, but the hole edge was not always cleanly cut. This uneven cut edge was considered not to influence the bone-healing process. Drilling at 200 r.p.m. introduced a lower degree of circularity. The subsequent bone formation was retarded by 5000 r.p.m. drilling, presumably due to thermal damage and vascular obstructions. The irrigation was effective in reducing the ischaemic area. These results suggest that a speed of about 500 r.p.m. may be recommendable for intraosseous implantation of biomaterials. The central irrigation system is considered effective in reducing the ischaemic area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. H. JACOBS, M. H. POPE, J. T. BERRY and F. T. HOAGLUND, J. Biomech. 7 (1974) 131.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. H. JACOBS, J. T. BERRY, M. H. POPE and F. T. HOAGLUND, J. Biomech. 9 (1976) 343.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. O. BECHTOL, A. B. FERGUSON and P.G. LAING, “Metals and Engineering in Bone and Joint Surgery” (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. L. WIGGINS and S. MALKIN, J. Biomech. 9 (1976) 553.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. A. HOBKIRK and K. RUSINIAK, J. Oral Surg. 35 (1977) 968.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. C. THOMPSON, J. Oral Surg. 16 (1958) 22.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. S. MATTHEWS and C. HIRSCH, J. Bone Joint Surg. 54A (1972) 297.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. M. HALL, J. Oral Surg. 17 (1959) 3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. S. RAFEL, J. Oral Surg. 20 (1962) 475.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. R. COSTICH, P. J. YOUNGBLOOD and J. M. WALDEN, Oral Surg. 17 (1964) 563.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. W. MOSS, Oral Surg. 17 (1964) 405.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. J. BOYNE, J. Dent. Res. 45 (1966) 270.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. M. HALL, Oral Surg. 20 (1965) 150.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. R. ERIKSSON, T. ALBREKTSSON and B. ALBREKTSSON, Acta Orthop. Scand. 55 (1984) 629.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. LUNDSKOG, Scand. J. Plast. Reconstruct. Surg. 9 (Suppl No. 9) (1972) p. 11.

  16. S. SEVITT, in “Bone Repair and Fracture Healing in Man” (Churchill Livingstone, London, 1981) p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohashi, H., Therin, M., Meunier, A. et al. The effect of drilling parameters on bone. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 5, 225–231 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121093

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121093

Keywords

Navigation