Skip to main content
Log in

The non-volant mammal fauna of Mexico:species richness in a megadiverse country

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mammalian fauna of Mexico is one of the world's richest. Mexico can be considered a true country of megadiversity because it has more species of non-volant mammals than any other country in the New World, even after taking account of the effect of size. A comparison with other political units of the New World showed that the country as a whole harbours more non-volant mammals than expected for its size, whereas individual Mexican states have about the number of species that would be expected for their area. Beta, or differentiation diversity and environmental heterogeneity, rather than alpha or within-habitat diversity, are the key factors that determine the unusually high species richness of the country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arita, H.T. (1993) Riqueza de especies de la mastofauna de México. In Avances de la Mastozoologia en México (R. A. Medellín and G. Ceballos, eds) pp. 109-25. Mexico: Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos, G. and Miranda, A. (1986) Los mamíferos de Chamela, Jalisco. Mexico: Instituto de Biología, UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos, G. and Navarro, L.D. (1991) Diversity and conservation of Mexican mammals. In Latin American Mammalogy, History, Biodiversity and Conservation (M.A. Mares and D.J. Schmidly, eds) pp. 167-98. Norman: Oklahoma University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M.L. (1975) Towards a theory of continental species diversity: bird distributions over mediterranean habitat gradients. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities (M. L. Cody and J. Diamond, eds) pp. 214-57. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espenshade, E.B. and Morrison, J.L. (1986) Goode's World Atlas, 17th edn. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fa, J.E. and Morales, L.E. (1993) Patterns of mammalian diversity in Mexico. In Biological Diversity of Mexico: Origins and Distribution (T. P. Ramamoorthy, R. Bye, A. Lot and J. Fa, eds) pp. 319-61. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, V.O. (1993) Herpetofauna of Mexico: distribution and endemism. In Biological Diversity of Mexico: Origins and Distribution (T.P. Ramamoorthy, R. Bye, A. Lot and J. Fa, eds) pp. 253-80. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, E. (1988) Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen para adaptarlo a las condiciones de la República Mexicana. Mexico: Larios.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S., Ross, S. and Lawton, J.H. (1992) Beta diversity on geographic gradients in Britain. J. Anim. Ecol. 67, 151-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, A.J. and Usher, M.B. (1980) Should nature reserves be large or small? Nature 285, 568-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, E.D. and Connor, E.F. (1980) Latitudinal gradients in the species diversity of North American mammals. Evolution 34, 193-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R., Nicholls, A.O. and Pressey, R.L. (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biol. Conserv. 43, 63-76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medellín, R.A. (1994) Mammal diversity and conservation in the Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, Mexico. Conserv. Biol. 8, 780-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R.A. (1988) Primate diversity and the tropical forest: case studies from Brazil and Madagascar and the importance of megadiversity countries. In Biodiversity (E.O. Wilson, ed.) pp. 145-54. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R.A. and Goettsch de M., C. (1992) La importancia de la diversidad biológica de México. In México ante los retos de la biodiversidad (J. Sarukhán and R. Dirzo, eds) pp. 63-73. Mexico: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, R.L., Humphries, C.J., Margules, C.R., Vane-Wright, R.I. and Williams, P.H. (1993) Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8, 124-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey R.L., Johnson, I.R. and Wilson, P.D. (1994) Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal. Biodiv. Conserv. 3, 242-62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shmida, A. and Wilson, M.V. (1985) Biological determinants of species diversity. J. Biogeo. 12, 1-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D.S. and Abele, L.G. (1976) Island biogeography theory and conservation practice. Science 191, 285-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D.S. and Abele, L.G. (1982) Refuge design and island biogeographic theory: effects of fragmentation. Amer. Natur. 120, 41-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sisk, T.D., Launer, A.E., Swittky, K.R. and Ehrlich, P.R. (1994) Identifying extinction threats. Bioscience 44, 592-604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPP (Secretaría de Programación y Presupuesto) (1986) Agenda estadística 1985. Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright, R.I., Humphries, C.J. and Williams, P.H. (1991) What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol. Monog. 30, 279-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. (1977) Evolution of species diversity in land communities. Evol. Biol. 10, 1-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, M.R. and Sandlin, E.A. (1991) Gradients of species density and species turnover in New World bats: a comparison of quadrat and band methodologies. In Latin American Mammalogy, History, Biodiversity and Conservation (M.A. Mares and D.J. Schmidly, eds) pp. 81-96. Norman: Oklahoma University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, M.R. and Selcer, K.W. (1989) Bat species density gradients in the New World: a statistical assessment. J. Biogeo. 16, 189-95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.W., III. (1974) Analytical zoogeography of North American mammals. Evolution 28, 124-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.E. (1983) Checklist of mammals. In Costa Rican Natural History (D.H. Janzen, ed.) pp. 443-7. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J.H. (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arita, H.T. The non-volant mammal fauna of Mexico:species richness in a megadiverse country. Biodiversity and Conservation 6, 787–795 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000010402.08813.ab

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000010402.08813.ab

Navigation