Skip to main content
Log in

Asymmetry correction equations for hand volume, grip and pinch strengths in healthy working people

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessments of oedema and decrease in hand strength are useful for patients with a hand lesion. This study examined the asymmetry of the arms and determined the estimates of the unknown prior to lesion values for hand volume, grip strengths assessed with a Jamar dynamometer (GSJ) and a Collins dynamometer (GSC), and pinch strength with a Jamar pinch gauge (PS) in 100 healthy working people. Hand volume, GSJ, GSC, and PS of the dominant hand were respectively 3.6 ± 4.1%, 6.6 ± 9.2%, 11.7 ± 11.2%, and 8.0 ± 13.2% higher than those of the non-dominant hand (p < 0.001). Very good estimates were obtained with the values of the contralateral arm for all the indices studied. The correlation coefficient equalled 0.95 for hand volume, 0.91 for GSJ, 0.83 for GSC, and 0.72 for PS. These estimates allow us to evaluate the evolution of oedema and hand strengths in patients with hand injury, especially to determine whether they could return to work as they are mostly manual workers with demanding jobs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caisse Nationale de l'Assurance Maladie des Travailleurs Salariés (CNAMTS). Statistiques financières et technologiques des accidents du travail. Années 1991, 1992, 1993. Paris: CNAMTS, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gable C, Chau N, Xénard J, André JM. Accords interjuges d'une mesure fonctionnelle analytique du membre supérieur. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 1993; 41: 72–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beverly MC, Rider TA, Evans MJ, Smith R. Local bone mineral response to brief exercise that stresses the skeleton. Br Med J 1989; 299: 233–235.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tubiana R. Traitéde chirurgie de la main. Tome 1: Anatomie. Physiologie. Biologie. Méthodes d'examen. Paris: Masson, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chau N, d'Houtaud A, Gruber M, Monhoven N, Gavillot C, Pétry D, Bourgkard E, Guillaume S, André JM. Personality self-representation of patients with hand injury, and its relationship with work injury. Eur J Epidemiol 1995; 11: 373–382.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Godal R, Swedborg I. A correction for the natural asymmetry of the arms in the determination of the volume of oedema. Scand J Rehab Med 1982; 14: 193–195.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bednarczyk JH, Hershler C, Cooper DG. Development and Clinical Evaluation of a Computerized Limb Volume Measurement System (CLEMS). Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 60–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Petersen P, Petrick M, Connor H, Conklin D. Grip strength and hand dominance: Challenging the 10% rule. Am J Occup Ther 1989; 43: 444–447.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bechtol CO. Grip test: Use of a dynamometer with adjustable handle spacing. J Bone Joint Surg 1954; 36A: 820–824.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66: 69–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lunde BK, Brewer WD, Garcia PA. Grip strength of college women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1972; 53: 491–493.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt RT, Toews JV. Grip strength as measured by the Jamar dynamometer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1970; 51: 321–327.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Swanson AB, Matev IB, Groot G. The strength of the hand. Bull Prosthet Res 1970; 10: 145–153.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kellor M, Frost J, Silberberg N, Iversen I, Cummings R. Hand strength and dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 1971; 25: 77–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chau N, Pétry D, Bourgkard E, Huguenin P, Remy E, André JM. Comparison between estimates of hand volume and hand strengths with sex and age with and without anthropometric data in healthy working people. Eur J Epidemiol 1997; 13: 309–316.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Edwards DAW, Hammond WH, Heary NJR, Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH. Design and accuracy of calipers for measuring subcutaneous tissue thickness. Br J Nutr 1955; 9: 133–143.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cnockaert JC, Pertuzon E. Détermination des constantes biomécaniques d'un segment corporel (avant-brans plus main). I. Mesure du volume et estimation de la masse. Le travail Humain 1970; 33: 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gurney JM, Jelliffe DB. Arm anthropometry in nutritional assessment: Nomogram for rapid calculation of muscle circumference and cross-sectional muscle and fat areas. Am J Clin Nutr 1973; 26: 912–915.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of hand strength evaluation. J Hand Surg 1984; 9A: 222–226.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kirpatric JE. Evaluation of grip loss. Calif Med 1956; 85: 314–320.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fess EE, Moran C. Clinial Assessment Recommendations. Indianapolis: American Society of Hand Therapists, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Freund RJ, Minton PD. Regression methods. A tool for data analysis, statistics: Textbooks and monographs, Vol 30. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chau N, Patris A, Martin J, Kohler F, Lambert JP. Conception d'un logiciel de traitement et d'interrogations statistiques de données Logist. Int J Biomed Comput 1985; 16: 95–118.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Scott PA. Morphological characteristics of elite male field hockey players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1991; 31: 57–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Maughan RJ, Abel RW, Watson JS, Weir J. Forearm composition and muscle function in trained and untrained limbs. Clin Physiol 1986; 6: 389–396.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chau, N., Remy, E., Pétry, D. et al. Asymmetry correction equations for hand volume, grip and pinch strengths in healthy working people. Eur J Epidemiol 14, 71–77 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007436000228

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007436000228

Navigation