Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of amide proton exchange in reduced and oxidizedRhodobacter capsulatus cytochrome c2: A1H−15N NMR study

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Biomolecular NMR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The hydrogen-deuterium exchange rates of the reduced and oxidized forms ofRhodobacter' capsulatus cytochrome c2 were studied by1H−15N homonuclear multiple quantum correlation spectroscopy. Minimal differences were observed for the N- and C-terminal helices on changing redox state suggesting that although these helices are structurally important they do not affect the relative stability of the two redox states and hence may not be important in determining the redox potential differences observed amongst the class I c-type cytochromes. However, significant differences were observed for other regions of the protein. For example, all slow exchanging protons of the helix spanning Phe82 to Asp87 are similarly affected on reduction indicating that the unfolding equilibrium of this helix is altered between the two redox states. Other regions are not as simple to interpret; however, the difference in NH exchange rates between the redox states for a number of residues including His17, Leu37, Arg43, Ala45, Gly46, Ile57, Val58, Leu60, Gly61 and Leu100 suggest that interactions affecting the causes of these differences may be important factors in determining redox potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NMR:

nuclear magnetic resonance

HMQC:

homonuclear multiple quantum correlation

NOESY:

nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy

References

  • Bax, A., Griffey, R.H. and Hawkins, B.L. (1983)J. Magn. Reson.,55, 301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, G.E., (1981) Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, San Diego.

  • Bushnell, G.W., Louie, G.V. and Brayer, G.D. (1990)J. Mol. Biol.,214, 585–595.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caffrey, M.S. (1990) Ph.D. Thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson.

  • Cusanovich, M.A., Meyer, T.E. and Tollin, G. (1988) InAdvances in Inorganic Biochemistry, Heme Proteins 7, (Eds, Eichhorn, G.L. and Manzilli, L. G.) Elsevier, New York, pp. 37–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, R.E. and Timkovich, R. (1975) inThe Enzymes, 3rd ed., Vol. 11 (Ed, Boyer, P.D.), Academic Press, N.Y., pp. 397–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englander, J.J., Rogero, J.R. and Englander, S.W. (1983)J. Mol. Biol.,169, 325–344.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Englander, S.W. and Kallenbach, N.R. (1984)Q. Rev. Biophys.,16, 521–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooley, P.R., Caffrey, M.S., Cusanovich, M.A. and MacKenzie, N.E. (1990)Biochemistry,29, 2278–2290.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gooley, P.R. and MacKenzie, N.E. (1990)FEBS Lett.,260, 225–228.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gooley, P.R., Caffrey, M.S., Cusanovich, M.A. and MacKenzie, N.E. (1991)Eur. J. Biochem.,196, 653–661.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hvidt, A. and Nielsen, S.O. (1966)Adv. Protein Chem.,21, 287–386.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeener, J., Meier, B.H., Bachman, P. and Ernst, R.R. (1979)J. Chem. Phys.,71, 4546–4553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassner, R.J. (1972)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,69, 2263–2267.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuwajima, K. and Baldwin, R.L. (1983)J. Mol. Biol. 169, 299–323.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Louie, G.V. and Brayer, G.D. (1990)J. Mol. Biol.,214, 527–555.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molday, R.S., Englander, S.W. and Kallen, R.G. (1972)Biochemistry,11, 150–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roder, H., Wagner, G. and Wüthrich, K. (1985)Biochemistry,24, 7396–7407.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takano, T. and Dickerson, R.E. (1981a)J. Mol. Biol.,153, 79–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takano, T. and Dickerson, R.E. (1981b)J. Mol. Biol.,153, 95–115.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, G. and Wüthrich, K. (1982)J. Mol. Biol.,160, 343–361.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wand, A.J., Roder, H. and Englander, S.W. (1986)Biochemistry,25, 1107–1114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gooley, P.R., Zhao, D. & MacKenzie, N.E. Comparison of amide proton exchange in reduced and oxidizedRhodobacter capsulatus cytochrome c2: A1H−15N NMR study. J Biomol NMR 1, 145–154 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01877226

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01877226

Keywords

Navigation