Skip to main content
Log in

Racial differences in the risk of invasive squamous-cell cervical cancer

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

To investigate reasons for the higher rates of invasive squamous-cell cervical carcinoma among Blacks than Whites in the United States, we examined data from a case-control study of cervical cancer conducted in five geographic areas of the US, supplemented by incidence data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, and hysterectomy prevalence data from the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study. We observed only minor differences between Blacks and Whites in the magnitude of relative risks associated with a long interval since last Pap smear, multiple sexual partners, cigarette smoking, a higher number of births, and low levels of income and education. Thus, differences in the strength of associations contributed little to the higher incidence rate in Blacks, but the prevalence of these risk factors, except for cigarette smoking, was higher in Blacks than Whites. The SEER incidence rate ratio of 2.3 for Blacks compared to whites was increased to 2.7 when incidence rates utilized denominators corrected for prevalence of hysterectomy, while the rate difference increased from 14.9 to 25.8 cases per 100,000 person-years (PY). We estimated further that, after adjustment for prevalence of hysterectomy, the incidence rate for women at the lowest levels of exposure to the risk factors evaluated was 2.2 times higher in Blacks than Whites, but that the corresponding rate difference was only 2.2 cases per 100,000 PYs. Thus, our results suggest that racial differences in the prevalence of exposure to identified risk factors account for most of the difference in incidence rates. It remains to be determined what, as yet unidentified, aspects of lower socioeconomic status contribute to the higher incidence rate in Blacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Devesa SS. Descriptive epidemiology of cancer of the uterine cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 605–12.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Devesa SS, Young JL, Brinton LA, Fraumeni JFJr. Recent trends in cervix uteri cancer. Cancer 1989; 64: 2184–90.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brinton LA, Fraumeni JFJr. Epidemiology of uterine cervical cancer. J Chron Dis 1986; 39: 1051–65.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Munoz N, Bosch X, Kaldor JM. Does human papillomavirus cause cervical cancer? The state of the epidemiologic evidence. Br J Cancer 1988; 57: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, National Cancer Institute, Unpublished data; August 1989 tape.

  6. The Centers for Disease Control Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study. Long-term oral contraceptive use and the risk of breast cancer. JAMA 1983; 249: 1591–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brinton LA, Hamman RF, Huggins GR, et al. Sexual and reproductive risk factors for invasive squamous cell cervical cancer. JNCI 1987; 79: 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Waksberg J. Sampling methods of random digit dialing. J Am Stat Assoc 1978; 73: 40–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hartge P, Brinton LA, Rosenthal JF, Cahill JI, Hoover RN, Waksberg J. Random digit dialing in selecting a population-based control group. Am J Epidemiol 1984; 120: 825–33.

    Google Scholar 

  10. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, First Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1976.

  11. Brinton LA, Tashima KT, Lehman HF, et al. Epidemiology of cervical cancer by cell type. Cancer Res 1987; 47: 1706–11.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Vol I. The Analysis of Case-control Studies. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1980; IARC Sci. Pub. No. 74: 192–279.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bruzzi P, Green SB, Byar DP, Brinton LA, Schairer C. Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 122: 904–14.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hysterectomies in the United States, 1965–1984. Data from the National Health Survey, Series 13, No. 92. National Center for Health Statistics.

  15. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for White females who are examined annually. JNCI 1989; 81: 1879–86.

    Google Scholar 

  16. US Bureau of the Census. Census of Population: 1980 Vol. I. Characteristics of the Population. Chapter C. General Social and Economic Characteristics. Part I. United States Summary PC80-1-C1. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.

  17. Schoenborn CA, Cohen BH. Trends in smoking, alcohol consumption, and other health practices among US adults, 1977 and 1983. National Center for Health Statistics Advance Data. No. 118, 30 June, 1986.

  18. Bloom B: Use of Selected Preventive Care Procedures, United States, 1982. Data from the National Health Survey Series 10, No. 157. Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health; DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 86-1585.

  19. Makuc DM, Freid VM, Kleinman JC. National trends in the use of preventive health care by women. Am J Public Health 1989; 79: 21–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Devesa SS, Diamond EL. Association of breast cancer and cervical cancer incidences with income and education among Whites and Blacks. JNCI 1980; 65: 515–28.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McWhorter WP, Schatzkin AG, Horm JW, Brown CC. Contribution of socioeconomic status to Black/White differences in cancer incidence. Cancer 1989; 63: 982–7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Baquet CR, Horm JW, Gibbs T, Greenwald P. Socioeconomic factors and cancer incidence among Blacks and Whites. JNCI 1991; 83: 551–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Personal Communication, Lynn Harlan, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, US.

  24. La Vecchia C, Decarli A, Fasoli M, et al. Dietary vitamin A and the risk of intraepithelial and invasive neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 1988; 30: 187–95.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marshall JR, Graham S, Byers T, Swanson M, Brasure J. Diet and smoking in the epidemiology of cancer of the cervix. JNCI 1983; 70: 847–51.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ziegler RG, Brinton LA, Hamman RF, et al. Diet and the risk of invasive cervical cancer among White women in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 132: 432–45.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Newell GR, Borrud LG, McPherson RS, Nichaman MZ, Pillow PC. Nutrient intakes of Whites, Blacks, and Mexican Americans in southeast Texas. Prev Med 1988; 17: 622–33.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Windham CT, Wyse BW, Hansen RG, Hurst RL. Nutrient density of diets in the USDA nationwide food consumption survey, 1977–1978: I. Impact of socioeconomic status on dietary density. J Am Diet Assoc 1983; 82: 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Brinton LA, Reeves WC, Brenes MM, et al. The male factor in the etiology of cervical cancer among sexually monogamous women. Int J Cancer 1989; 44: 199–203.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Authors are with the Epidemiology and Biostatistics Program, Division of Cancer Etiology, National Cancer Institute. Address correspondence to Ms Schairer, Environmental Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Executive Plaza North, Room 443, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schairer, C., Brinton, L.A., Devesa, S.S. et al. Racial differences in the risk of invasive squamous-cell cervical cancer. Cancer Causes Control 2, 283–290 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051667

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051667

Key words

Navigation