Skip to main content
Log in

Genotoxic potential of cyclosporin A in patients with renal transplantation

  • Published:
Cell Biology and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyzed the induction of sister chromatid exchange (SCE) by cyclosporin A (CsA) as a marker of genotoxic potential. In 30 patients undergoing renal transplantation, SCE induction was tested before the introduction of CsA and 3 months later. We found that SCE frequency increased significantly at the end of 3 months. To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating in vivo induction of SCE by CsA in humans. We conclude that CsA has a genotoxic potential on human lymphocytes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beveridge T, Krupp P, McKibbin C. Letters to the editor: lymphomas and lymphoproliferative lesions developing under cyclosporine therapy. Lancet. 1984;1:788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borel JF. Cyclosporine A: present experimental studies. Transplant Proc. 1981;13:344-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borel JF, Feurer C, Gubler H, Stahelin H. Biological effects of cyclosporine A: a new anti-lymphocytic agent. Agent Actions. 1976;4:468-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borel JF, Fewer C, Magnee C, Stahelin H. Effects of the new antilymphocytic peptide cyclosporine A in animals. Immunology. 1977;32:1017-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calne RY, White DJG, Evans DB et al. Cyclosporine A in cadaveric organ transplantation. Br Med J. 1981;282:934-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cammisuli S. The effect of cyclosporine A on cell interactions within the immune system. In: White DJG, ed. Cyclosporine A. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1982:243-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean BJ, Danford N. Assays for the detection of chemically-induced chromosome damage in cultured mammalian cells. In: Venitt S, Parry JM, eds. Mutagenicity testing. A practical approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1984:187-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhart E. Sister chromatid exchanges and structural chromosome aberration in mutagenicity testing. Hum Genet. 1981; 58:235-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess AD, Tutschka PJ, Santos GW. The effect of cyclosporine A on T-lymphocyte subpopulations. In: White DJG, ed. Cyclosporine A. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1982:209-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matter BE, Donatsch PP, Raube RR, Schmid B, Schmid W. Genotoxicity evaluation of cyclosporine A, a new immunosuppressive agent. Mutat Res. 1982;105:257-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi Y, Schneider EL. In vivo sister chromatid exchange. A sensitive measure of DNA damage. Mutat Res. 1979;60:329-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshan AF, Mattison DR, Zwanenburg TS. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Cyclosporine A: review of genotoxicity and potential for adverse human reproductive and developmental effects. Report of a working group on the genotoxicity of Cyclosporine A. Mutat Res. 1994;317(2):163-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paavonen T, Hayry P. Effect of cyclosporine A on T-dependent and independent immunoglobulin synthesis in vitro. Nature. 1980;287:542-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn I. Lymphomas complicating organ transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1983;15:2790-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry Y, Evans H. Cytological detection of mutagen carcinogen exposure by sister chromatid exchange. Nature. 1975;258:121-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Physicians' Desk Reference. Montreal: Medical Economics Company; 1997:2405-9.

  • Richardson A. Analysis of cytogenetic abnormalities. In: Barch MJ, ed. ACT cytogenetics laboratory manual, 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryffel B, Donatsch PP, Madorin M et al. Toxicologicl evaluation of cyclosporine A. Arch Toxicol. 1983;53:107-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarto F, Faccioli MC, Cominato I, Levis AG. Aging and smoking increase the frequency of sister-chromatid exchanges (SCE) in man. Mutat Res. 1985;144:183-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seino Y, Nagao M, Yagahi T et al. Mutagenicity of several classes of antitumor agents to Salmonella typhimurium TA 98, TA 100 and TA 92. Cancer Res. 1978;38:2148-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speck WT, Rosenkranz HS. Mutagenicity of azathioprine. Cancer Res. 1976;36:108-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • White DJG, Plumb AM, Pawelec G, Brons G. Cyclosporine A: an immunosuppressive agent preferentially active against proliferating T-cells. Transplantation. 1979;27:55-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollf S, Perry P. Differential giemsa staining of sister chromatids and study of sister chromatid exchanges without autoradiography. Chromosoma (Brl). 1974;48:341-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuzawa K, Kando I, Fukao K, Iwasaki Y, Hamaguchi H. Induction of sister chromatid exchange in human cells. Transplantation. 1986;42(1):61-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwanenburg TS, Cartier A. No cyclosporine induced chromosomal aberrations in human peripheral blood lymphocytes in vitro. Mutat Res. 1994;320(3):217-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwanenburg TS, Suter W, Matter BE. Absence of genotoxic potential for cyclosporine in experimental systems. Transplant Proc. 1988;20(2):435-7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palanduz, Ş., Sever, M., öztürk, Ş. et al. Genotoxic potential of cyclosporin A in patients with renal transplantation. Cell Biol Toxicol 15, 13–17 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007594421458

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007594421458

Navigation