Summary
Three S1-recurrent selection programs (designated HG, HP, and HGP) for increasing protein yield of oat (Avena sativa L.) were conducted for five cycles of selection. The selection criteria in each program (line of descent) emphasized different components of protein yield; high grain yield in HG, both high protein concentration of the groats (caryopsis) and high grain yield in HP, and high protein yield per se in HGP. Heading date and height were restricted to no net change. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the agronomic performance of these three lines of descent and the correlated responses in agronomic traits due to selection. Thirty to sixty random S0-derived lines from each cycle and ten check lines were grown in hill-plot experiments at two locations in 1989. Grain yield increased in all three lines of descent; HG showed the greatest rate of gain followed by HGP and then HP (0.20, 0.10, and 0.07 Mg ha-1 per cycle, respectively). Test weight decreased in HGP by 2.6 kg m-3 per cycle and in HP by 4.0 kg m-3 per cycle, but remained constant in HG. Cycle 5 (C5) means for straw yield, height, and seed weight were not significantly different from the C0 means for any line of descent. Groat percent remained unchanged in HGP, increased from 70.1 to 71.7% in HG, and decreased from 69.9 to 67.6% in HP. Heading date decreased by 3 d in HG and HGP, but remained unchanged in HP. HG compares most favorably with commercial cultivars because of its high yield and acceptable agronomic traits, while HP tends to be low in test weight, seed weight, and groat percent.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BM-:
-
above ground biomass
- GP-:
-
groat (caryopsis) percent, fraction of average seed weight that is groat rather than hulls
- GPC-:
-
groat-protein concentration
- GPY-:
-
groat-protein yield
- GTY-:
-
groat yield
- GY-:
-
grain yield
- HD-:
-
heading date
- HG-:
-
selection for protein yield through high grain yield
- HGP-:
-
selection for protein yield per se
- HP-:
-
selection for protein yield through high grain yield and high groat-protein concentration
- HT-:
-
height
- PY-:
-
protein yield
- SDWT-:
-
seed weight
- SY-:
-
straw yield
- TWT-:
-
test weight
References
Baltenberger, D.E., H.W. Ohm & J.E. Foster, 1988. Recurrent selection for tolerance to barley yellow dwarf virus in oat. Crop Sci. 28: 477–481.
Bulmer, M.G., 1957. Approximate confidence limits for components of variance. Biometrika 44: 159–167.
Fehr, W.A., 1987. Principles of cultivar development, I. MacMillan Publishing Co., New York.
Forsberg, R.A. & H.L. Shands, 1989. Oat breeding. Plant Breeding Reviews 6: 167–207.
Hallauer, A.R., 1985. Compendium of recurrent selection methods & their application. CRC Critical Rev. in Plant Sci. 13 (Issue 1): 1–33.
Khadr, F.H. & K.J. Frey, 1965. Efficiency of recurrent selection in oat breeding (Avena sativa L.). Crop Sci. 5: 349–354.
Klein, S.J. & K.J. Frey, 1993. Recurrent selection for test weight of oat and grain yield. Crop Sci. 33: 744–749.
Knapp, S.J., W.W. Stroup & W.M. Ross, 1985. Exact confidence intervals for heritability on a progeny mean basis. Crop Sci. 25: 192–195.
Kuenzel, K.A. & K.J. Frey, 1985. Protein yield of oats as determined by protein percentage & grain yield. Euphytica 34: 21–31.
McFerson, J.K. & K.J. Frey, 1990. Three selection strategies to increase protein yield in oats. J. Genet. Breeding 44: 39–48.
McFerson, J.K. & K.J. Frey, 1991. Recurrent selection for protein yield of oat. Crop Sci. 31: 1–8.
McFerson, J.K. & K.J. Frey, 1992. Correlated response to selection for protein yield in oats after three cycles of recurrent selection. Plant Breed. 108: 149–161.
Moser, H.S. & K.J. Frey, 1993. Direct and correlated responses to three S1-recurrent selection strategies for increasing groat-protein yield in oat. In review.
Pixley, K.V. & K.J. Frey, 1992. Genetic interrelations among grain quality indicators and agronomic traits for oat. Euphytica 60: 149–156.
Satterthwaite, R.E., 1946. An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bull. 2: 110–114.
Schipper, H. & K.J. Frey, 1991. Observed grains from three recurrent selection regimes for increased groat-oil content of oat. Crop Sci. 31: 1505–1510.
Steel, R.D.G. & J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
Stuthman, D.D., 1988. Population improvement in oat gene pools: Grain yield. p. 87–92. In: B. Mattson & R. Lyhagen (Eds.) Third International Oat Conference, Proceedings. Svalöf AB, Sweden.
Youngs, V.L. & R.A. Forsberg, 1987. Oat. p. 457–499. In: R.A. Olson & K.J. Frey (Eds.) Nutritional Quality of Cereal Grains: Genetic and agronomic improvement. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moser, H.S., Frey, K.J. Effects of S1-recurrent selection for protein yield on seven agronomic traits of oat. Euphytica 70, 141–150 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029651
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029651