Abstract
There is no standard model of transformation for post- socialist countries and each country encounters specific problems rooted in the geographical characteristics of the areas concerned. The human resources are of the greatest importance because it really matters how people (especially the decision-makers) perceive system change and continually reformulate their expectations and strategies; so investigations into the views of people caught up in the transformation can provide a deeper understanding of the background to structural change. Working the national, regional level and local levels in Romania, experts were asked to consider the advantages and disadvantages arising out of the transformation, the most important problems and constraints for future rural development and the policies needed. The paper examines the responses on demographic and social issues. It emerges the most detailed responses were supplied by local-level representatives while respondents at the regional level steered a middle course between the need to address local problems and the prime importance of stimulating the Romanian economy so as to generate resources for welfare programmes (with the latter issue the overriding concern of interviewees at national level). There was general agreement on the importance of foreign investment and European integration for economic development, with local actors taking only small steps in line with the existing opportunities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Heller W., 1998: Experiences and assessments of the transformation from private households' point of view. In: Heller W. (ed.), Romania: Migration, socio-economic transformation and perspectives of regional development. Südosteuropa-Studien 62, Südosteuropa-Gesellschaft, München, pp. 190–204.
Heller W., 1999: The non-agricultural economy in post-socialist rural Romania: The insights and perceptions of national, regional and local institutions. GeoJournal, 46: 199–205.
Maner H.-Chr., 1998: Die rumänisch orthodoxe Kirche im post-kommunistischen Kontext. Südosteuropa: Zeitschrift für Gegenwartsforschung, 47(9): 421–43.
National Commission for Statistics (NCS), 1998: Statistical Yearbook of Romania 1997. NCS, Bucharest.
Offe C., 1994: Der Tunnel am Ende des Lichts: Erkundungen der politischen Transformation im neuen Osten. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/New York.
Romanian Government and European Community, 1997: Green Paper: Regional development policy in Romania. PHARE Programme, Bucharest.
Shane B., 1997: Familienplanung rettet Leben. Deutsche Stiftung Weltbevölkerung, Hannover.
Wagner F.P., 1996: Der Wandel der Lebensverhältnisse in Rumänien nach Ceausescu. In: Glatzer W. (ed.), Lebensverhältnisse in Osteuropa: Prekäre Entwicklungen und neue Konturen, Campus, Frankfurt, pp. 211–35.
Zamfir C., 1995: Politica sociala in Romania in tranzitie. In: Zamfir C., Zamfir E. (eds), Politici sociale: Romania in context European. Editura Alternative, Bucuresti.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heller, W. Socioeconomic transformation in rural Romania through the eyes of experts: Demographic and social issues. GeoJournal 50, 151–155 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007120608735
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007120608735