Skip to main content
Log in

Incomplete posterior U.G.H. syndrome — different iatrogenic entity?

  • Case Report
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

U.G.H. syndrome is a known complication of IOL implantation associated with the use of anterior and rarely, posterior chamber intraocular lenses. It is due to mechanical excoriation of the angle or iris by the haptics or optic of an IOL and consists of uveitis, glaucoma and hyphema (U.G.H.). The advised therapeutic approach is explantation of the IOL. Following implantation of a posterior chamber IOL, three patients presented with bleeding into the posterior chamber, one associated with glaucoma. No patient had signs of uveitis. We decided to adress the symptoms and not to explant the IOL. We believe that this constitutes a variant of the ‘classical’ U.G.H. syndrome, namely an incomplete posterior U.G.H. (I.P.U.G.H.) syndrome, in which explantation of the I.O.L. is not compulsory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ellingson FT. The uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome associated with the Mark III anterior chamber lens implant. Am Intraocular Implant Soc J 1978; 44: 50.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berger RO. Fox shield treatment of the U.G.H. syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg 1986; 12 (4): 419–21.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Keates RH, Ehrlich DR. ‘Lenses of change’ complications of anterior chamber implants. Ophtalmology 1978; 85: 408.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hagan JC. A clinical review of the IOLAB Azar model 91Z flexible anterior chamber intraocular lens. Ophtalmic Surg 1987; 18 (4): 258–61.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Percival SPB, Das DR. U.G.H. syndrome after posterior chamber lens implantation. Am Intraocular Implant Soc J 1983; 9: 200.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Masket S. Pseudophakic posterior iris chafing syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg 1986; 12 (3): 252–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berger RR, McGrath E. A ‘tent trabeculectomy’ (T.T)-surgical alternative for countries of the Third World. Int Ophthalmol 1992; 16: 195–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clayman HM. Intraocular lenses. In: Duane TD (ed) ‘Clinical ophthalmology’, Vol 5 8B: 24. J.B. Lippincott Co., Philladelphia, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kern R. Complications and after-care in aphakic and pseudophakic patients. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1985; 186 (6): 468–70.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ravi T, Aylward GW, Billson FA. ‘In-the-bag’ hyphema - a rare complication of posterior chamber lens implantation. Br J Ophtalmol 1989; 73: 474–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hagan III, JG, Gaasterland DE. Endocapsular hematoma -description and treatment of a unique form of postoperative hemorrhage. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109: 514–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berger, R.R., Kenyeres, A.M. & Vlok, A.N. Incomplete posterior U.G.H. syndrome — different iatrogenic entity?. Int Ophthalmol 19, 317–320 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130929

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130929

Key words

Navigation