Skip to main content
Log in

Coupling constants again: Experimental restraints in structure refinement

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Utilization of coupling constants as restraints in computational structure refinement is reviewed. In addition, we address the effect of conformational averaging and examine different approaches to apply the restraints when the experimental observable is obviously a result of averaging. Here, two different computational methods are compared. The simulation of a single structure with time-dependent restraints produces results very similar to those obtained with the calculation of numerous copies of the molecule (an ensemble of structures) and ensemble averaging. The advantages and disadvantages of the two methods are illustrated with simulations of cyclosporin A, for which 117 NOEs and 62 homo- and heteronuclear coupling constants have been measured.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. KesslerH., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 21 (1982) 512.

    Google Scholar 

  2. SchillerP.W., In UdenfriendS. and MeienhoferJ. (Eds.) The Peptides, Vol. 6, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1984, pp. 219–268.

    Google Scholar 

  3. HrubyV.J., Al-ObeidiF. and KazmierskiW., Biochem. J., 268 (1990) 249.

    Google Scholar 

  4. VeberD.H., HollyF.W., PalevedaW.J., NuttR.F., BergstrandS.J., TorchianaM., GlitzerM.S., SapersteinR. and HirschmannR., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 75 (1978) 2636.

    Google Scholar 

  5. KesslerH. and KutscherB., Tetrahedron Lett., 26 (1985) 177.

    Google Scholar 

  6. LautzJ., KesslerH., BoelensR., KapteinR. and VanGunsterenW.F., Int. J. Pept. Protein Res., 30 (1987) 404.

    Google Scholar 

  7. AumailleyM., GurrathM., MüllerG., CalveteJ., TimplR. and KesslerH., FEBS Lett., 291 (1991) 50.

    Google Scholar 

  8. SaulitisJ., MierkeD.F., BykG., GilonC. and KesslerH., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 (1992) 4814.

    Google Scholar 

  9. HrubyV.J., Biopolymers, 33 (1993) 1073.

    Google Scholar 

  10. KarplusM., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 85 (1963) 2870.

    Google Scholar 

  11. BystrovV.F., Prog. NMR Spectrosc., 10 (1976) 41.

    Google Scholar 

  12. SchmiederP. and KesslerH., Biopolymers, 32 (1992) 435.

    Google Scholar 

  13. KesslerH., GriesingerC., ZarbockJ. and LoosliH.R., J. Magn. Reson., 57 (1984) 331.

    Google Scholar 

  14. KesslerH., BermelW. and GriesingerC., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107 (1986) 1083.

    Google Scholar 

  15. MontelioneG.T., WinklerM.E., RauenbuehlerP. and WagnerG., J. Magn. Reson., 82 (1989) 198.

    Google Scholar 

  16. NeriD., OttingG. and WüthrichK., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112 (1990) 3663.

    Google Scholar 

  17. KayL.E. and BaxA., J. Magn. Reson., 86 (1990) 110.

    Google Scholar 

  18. MontelioneG.T. and WagnerG., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111 (1989) 5474.

    Google Scholar 

  19. KeelerJ., NeuhausD. and TitmanJ.J., J. Chem. Phys., 146 (1988) 545.

    Google Scholar 

  20. TitmanJ.J., NeuhausD. and KeelerJ., J. Magn. Reson., 85 (1989) 111.

    Google Scholar 

  21. KimY. and PrestegardJ.H., Protein Struct. Funct. Genet., 8 (1990) 377.

    Google Scholar 

  22. SchmiederP., KurzM. and KesslerH., J. Biomol. NMR, 1 (1991) 403.

    Google Scholar 

  23. KurzM., SchmiederP. and KesslerH., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 31 (1992) 1329.

    Google Scholar 

  24. SeipS., BalbachJ. and KesslerH., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 31 (1992) 1609.

    Google Scholar 

  25. DeVliegD., BoelensR., ScheekR.M., KapteinR. and VanGunsterenW.F., Isr. J. Chem., 27 (1986) 181.

    Google Scholar 

  26. KlineA.D., BraunW. and WüthrichK., J. Mol. Biol., 204 (1988) 675.

    Google Scholar 

  27. MooreJ.M., CaseD.A., ChazinW.J., GippertG.P., HavelT.F., PowlsR. and WrightP.E., Science, 240 (1988) 314.

    Google Scholar 

  28. MierkeD.F. and KesslerH., Biopolymers, 32 (1992) 1277.

    Google Scholar 

  29. EberstadtM., MierkeD.F., KöckM. and KesslerH., Helv. Chim. Acta, 75 (1992) 2583.

    Google Scholar 

  30. EgliH. and VonPhilipsbornW., Helv. Chim. Acta, 64 (1981) 976.

    Google Scholar 

  31. MierkeD.F., Golic GrdadolnikS. and KesslerH., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114 (1992) 8283.

    Google Scholar 

  32. BaxA. and SubramanianS., J. Magn. Reson., 67 (1986) 565.

    Google Scholar 

  33. VuisterG.W., DelaglioF. and BaxA., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114 (1992) 9674.

    Google Scholar 

  34. TordaA.E., ScheekR.M. and VanGunsterenW.F., Chem. Phys. Lett., 157 (1989) 289.

    Google Scholar 

  35. TordaA.E., ScheekR.M. and VanGunsterenW.F., J. Mol. Biol., 214 (1990) 223.

    Google Scholar 

  36. TordaA.E., BrunneR.M., HuberT., KesslerH. and VanGunsterenW.F., J. Biomol. NMR, 3 (1993) 55.

    Google Scholar 

  37. KemminkJ., VanMierloC.P.M., ScheekR.M. and CreightonT.E., J. Mol. Biol., 230 (1993) 312.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mierke, D.F., Scheek, R.M. and Kessler, H., Biopolymers, (1994) in press.

  39. PachlerK.G.R., Spectrochim. Acta, 19 (1963) 2085.

    Google Scholar 

  40. KesslerH., KöckM., WeinT. and GehrkeM., Helv. Chim. Acta, 73 (1990) 1818.

    Google Scholar 

  41. VanGunsterenW.F. and BerendsenH.J.C., Groningen Molecular Simulation Library Manual (GROMOS), Biomos B.V., Groningen, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  42. VanGunsterenW.F. and BerendsenH.J.C., Mol. Simul., 1 (1988) 173.

    Google Scholar 

  43. RyckaertJ.P., CiccottiG. and BerendsenH.J.C., J. Comput. Phys., 23 (1977) 327.

    Google Scholar 

  44. BerendsenH.J.C., PostmaJ.P.M., VanGunsterenW.F., DiNolaA. and HaakJ.R., J. Chem. Phys., 81 (1984) 3684.

    Google Scholar 

  45. KapteinR., BoelensR., ScheekR.M. and VanGunsterenW.F., Biochemistry, 27 (1988) 5

    Google Scholar 

  46. HavelT.F., Biopolymers, 29 (1990) 1565.

    Google Scholar 

  47. HavelT.F., Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 56 (1991) 43.

    Google Scholar 

  48. CrippenG.M. and HavelT.F., Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformation, Research Studies Press Ltd. (Wiley), New York, NY, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  49. MierkeD.F. and KesslerH., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113 (1991) 9466.

    Google Scholar 

  50. LevittM. and SaronR., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85 (1988) 7557.

    Google Scholar 

  51. KurzM., MierkeD.F. and KesslerH., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 31 (1992) 210.

    Google Scholar 

  52. JorgensenW.L. and SeveranceD.L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112 (1990) 4768.

    Google Scholar 

  53. KonatR.K., MierkeD.F., KesslerH., KutscherB., BerndM. and VoegeliR., Helv. Chim. Acta, 76 (1993) 1649.

    Google Scholar 

  54. BrüschweilerR., RouxB., BlackledgeM., GriesingerC., KarplusM. and ErnstR.R., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114 (1992) 2289.

    Google Scholar 

  55. GilsonM.K. and HonigB., Protein Struct. Funct. Genet., 4 (1987) 7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mierke, D.F., Huber, T. & Kessler, H. Coupling constants again: Experimental restraints in structure refinement. J Computer-Aided Mol Des 8, 29–40 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124347

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124347

Key words

Navigation