Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of bronchodilator-inhaler aerosol propellants on respiratory gas monitors

  • Technical Notes
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spurious readings from a mass spectrometer have been reported following the administration of aerosol bronchodilators. We quantified the response of various respiratory gas analyzers to the aerosol propellant of albuterol inhalant (Proventil). The mass spectrometer systems tested, two Advantage systems, a SARA system, and a Model 6000 Ohmeda system, all displayed artifactual readings in response to the albuterol propellant. Each metered dose of the Proventil brand of albuterol contains 4 ml of Freon 11 (trichloromonofluoromethane) and 11 ml of Freon 12 (dichlorodifluoromethane). The concentration of propellant was expressed in doses/L, where each liter of gas contains 0.4 vol % of Freon 11 and 1.1 vol % of Freon 12 per dose. In proportion to the concentration of albuterol propellant, the two Advantage systems showed substantial readings of isoflurane (%) when no isoflurane was present (13% and 16% per dose/L) and reduced readings of enflurane (−8% and −10% per dose/L) and carbon dioxide (CO2) (−3 and +5 mm Hg per dose/L). The SARA system showed substantial CO2 readings when no CO2 was present (5 mm Hg per dose/L) and displayed small enflurane readings (0.1% per dose/L) when no enflurane was present. The Model 6000 unit showed CO2 readings when no CO2 was present (5 mm Hg per dose/L). Neither the Raman spectrometer, the infrared spectrometers, nor the piezoadsorptive analyzer we tested showed an artifactual effect of albuterol propellant on any of its readings. Simulation and clinical tests demonstrated that a single dose of albuterol propellant into a breathing circuit at the onset of inspiration resulted in concentrations of 0.8 and 0.3 dose/L, respectively. The phenomenon may be clinically useful, by allowing the anesthetist to verify the uptake of an inhalant into a patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gravenstein N, Theisen GJ, Knudsen AK. Misleading mass spectrometer reading caused by an aerosol propellant. Anesthesiology 1985;62:70–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McCleary U. Potential effects of an unknown gas on mass spectrometer readings. Anesthesiology 1985;63:724–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Knudsen AK, Johnson JV, Yost RA. More on mass spectrometers and aerosol propellants. Anesthesiology 1985;63:568–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Severinghaus JW, Young WG. A gas mixer for computer calibration of anesthetic mass spectrometers. J Clin Monit 1986;2:223–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elliott, W.R., Raemer, D.B., Goldman, D.B. et al. The effects of bronchodilator-inhaler aerosol propellants on respiratory gas monitors. J Clin Monitor Comput 7, 175–180 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01618119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01618119

Key words

Navigation