Skip to main content
Log in

Repair of Rat Gastric Mucosa (Effect of 16,16-Dimethyl Prostaglandin E2)

  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prostaglandins protect the gastric mucosaagainst a variety of injurious agents and may acceleratethe recovery of the gastric mucosa following damage. Inprevious studies prostaglandins were given prior to the injurious agent, so it was not possibleto distinguish their potential effects on acceleratingrepair or reducing initial damage. We have investigatedthe effect of 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 (dmPGE2) on the repair of thegastric muscosa after injury induced by severalinjurious agents. dmPGE2 was given orally 15min prior to aspirin or sodium salicylate, or 30 minafter aspirin, sodium salicylate, or ethanol. dmPGE2 delivered priorto injury reduced the aspirin-induced fall in mucosalpotential difference (PD), but had no effect on thatinduced by sodium salicylate. dmPGE2administered after ASA injury significantly increased recovery of PD (P <0.05), but did not alter the rate of recovery of PD withother damaging agents. Histological damage was decreasedin rats treated with dmPGE2 after aspirincompared to aspirin-only-treated rats (P < 0.02).Exogenous dmPGE2 protects and restoresgastric mucosal integrity after aspirin damage but hasno effect on the repair of sodium salicylate and ethanolinjured mucosa, suggesting that repair of the gastric mucosaafter aspirin damage is enhanced by dmPGE2due to its ability to prevent ongoing damage, ratherthan directly enhancing repair processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Carmichael HA, Nelson LM, Russell RI: Cimetidine and prostaglandin: Evidence for different modes of action on the rat gastric mucosa. Gastroenterology 74:1229–1232, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  2. Frydman GM, Penney AG, Malcontenti C, O'Brien PE: Time as a factor in the expression of ethanol injury to the gastric mucosa. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:461–465, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miller TA, Jacobson ED: Gastrointestinal cytoprotection by prostaglandins. Gut 20:75–87, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schmidt KL, Bellard RL, Smith GS, Henagan JM, Miller TA: Influence of prostaglandin on repair of rat stomach damaged by absolute ethanol. J Surg Res 41:367–377, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tarnawski A, Hollander D, Strachura J, Krause WJ, Gergely H: Prostaglandin protection of the gastric mucosa against alcohol injury—a dynamic time-related process. Role of the mucosal proliferative zone. Gastroenterology 88:334–352, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  6. Watanabe K, Yano S, Yamaguchi T: Effects of carbenoxolone and prostaglandin E2 on transmucosal potential difference in the rat stomach. Scand J Gastroenterol 24(suppl 162):87–90, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lacy ER, Ito S: Microscopic analysis of ethanol damage to rat gastric mucosa after treatment with a prostaglandin. Gastroenterology 83:619–625, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robert A, Nezamis JE, Lancaster C, Hanchar AJ: Cytoprotection by prostaglandins in rats. Prevention of gastric necrosis produced by alcohol, HCl, NaOH, hypertonic NaCl and thermal injury. Gastroenterology 77:433–443, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidt KL, Henagan JM, Smith GS, Hilburn PJ, Miller TA: Prostaglandin cytoprotection against ethanol induced gastric injury in the rat. Gastroenterology 88:649–659, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morris GP, Wallace JL, Harding PL: Effects of prostaglandin E2 on salicylate-induced damage to the rat gastric mucosa: Cytoprotection is not associated with preservation of the gastric mucosal barrier. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 62:1065–1069, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wallace JL, Whittle BJR: Acceleration of recovery of gastric epithelial integrity by 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2. Br J Pharmacol 86:837–842, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hojgaard L, Andersen JR, Krag E: A new method for measurement of the electrical potential difference across the stomach wall. Scand J Gastroenterol 22:847–858, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  13. Whittle BJR, Steel G: Evaluation of the protection of rat gastric mucosa by a prostaglandin analogue using cellular enzyme marker and histological techniques. Gastroenterology 88:315–327, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rowe PH, Starlinger MJ, Kasdon E, Hollands MJ, Silen W: Parenteral aspirin and sodium salicylate are equally injurious to the rat gastric mucosa. Gastroenterology 93:863–871, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rowe PH, Starlinger MJ, Kasdon E, Marrone G, Silen W: Effect of simulated systemic administration of aspirin, salicylate, and indomethacin on amphibian gastric mucosa. Gastroenterology 90:559–569, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  16. Svanes K, Critchlow J, Takeuchi K, Magee D, Ito S, Silen W: Factors influencing reconstitution of frog gastric mucosa: Role of prostaglandins. In Mechanisms of Mucosal Protection in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract. A Allen (ed). New York, Raven Press, 1984, pp 33–39

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goddard PJ, Kao YJ, Lichtenberger LM: Luminal surface hydrophobicity of canine gastric mucosa is dependent on a surface mucous gel. Gastroenterology 98:361–370, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  18. Davenport HW: Damage to the gastric mucosa: Effects of salicylates and stimulation. Gastroenterology 49:189–196, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ligumsky M, Grossman MI, Kauffman GL: Endogenous gastric mucosal prostaglandins: their role in mucosal integrity. Am J Physiol 242:G337–G341, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  20. Whittle BJR, Higgs GA, Eakins KE, Moncada S, Vane JR: Selective inhibition of prostaglandin production in inflammatory exudates and gastric mucosa. Nature 284:271–273, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  21. Takeuchi K, Nishiwaka H, Niida H, Okabe S: Different effects of cytoprotective drugs on ethanol and aspirin induced gastric mucosal injury in pylorus ligated rats. Dig Dis Sci 35(2):178–185, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lacy ER, Ito S: Rapid epithelial reconstruction of the rat gastric mucosa after ethanol injury. Lab Invest 51:573–583, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morris GP, Wallace JL: The roles of ethanol and of acid in the production of gastric mucosal erosions in rats. Virchows Arch (Cell Pathol) 38:23–38, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vracko R: Basal lamina scaffold: Anatomy and significance for maintenance of orderly tissue structure. Am J Pathol 77:314–338, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goddard PJ, Lichtenberger LM: In vitro recovery of canine gastric mucosal surface hydrophobicity and potential difference after aspirin damage. Dig Dis Sci 40(6):1352–1359, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  26. Konturek SJ, Piastucki I, Brzozowski T, Radecki T, Dembinska-Kiec A, Zmuda A, Grylglewski R: Role of prostaglandins in the formation of aspirin induced gastric ulcers. Gastroenterology 80:4–9, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vane J: Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis as a mechanism for aspirin like drugs. Nature 23:232–235, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  28. Collier HOJ, McDonald-Gibson WJ, Smith SA: Stimulation of prostaglandin biosynthesis by capsaicin, ethanol and tyramine. Lancet 1:702, 1975 (letter)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Konturek SJ, Brzozowski T, Piastucki I, Radecki T, Dembinsk A, Dembinska-Kiec A: Role of locally generated prostaglandins in adaptive gastric cytoprotection. Dig Dis Sci 27:967–971, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cook GA, Elliot SL, Giraud AS, Skeljo MV, Yeomans ND: Correlation between transmucosal potential difference and morphological damage during aspirin injury in rats. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:264–269, 1996

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cook, G.A., Elliott, S.L., Skeljo, M.V. et al. Repair of Rat Gastric Mucosa (Effect of 16,16-Dimethyl Prostaglandin E2). Dig Dis Sci 42, 654–660 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018828016573

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018828016573

Navigation