Summary
Attention for biases in the measurement of the Elasticity of Substitution (ES) in applied international trade flow modelling has a long tradition. It was mostly directed at the issue of the acceptability of the (often implicit) assumptions made on the parameters of the underlying demand model. The purpose of this paper is to prove both theoretically and with the help of some numerical examples that another strong potential source of biases in assessingES's in trade modelling does exist which gained remarkably little attention in the literature, namely, the regional pattern of international trade flows.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lächler, U. (1985), ‘The Elasticity of Substitution between Imported and Domestically Produced Goods in Germany,’Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 12, pp. 74–96.
Learner, E.E. and R.M. Stern (1970),Quantitative International Economics, Chicago.
Polak, J.J. (1950), ‘Note on the Measurement of Elasticity of Substitution in International Trade,’Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXII, pp. 16–20.
Richardson, J.D. (1973), ‘Beyond (But Back To?) the Elasticity of Substitution in International Trade,’European Economic Review, 4, pp. 381–72.
Stern, R.M., J. Francis and B. Schumacher (1976),Price Elasticities in International Trade. An Annotated Bibliography, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brakman, S., Jepma, C.J. On the elasticity of substitution in international trade. De Economist 138, 63–72 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718390
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718390