Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Results on Tungsten-Wire Explosions in Air at Atmospheric Pressure—Comparison with a One-Dimensional Numerical Model

  • Published:
International Journal of Thermophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experimental results on exploding tungsten wires in air at atmospheric pressure at current densities ≥107 A·cm−2 and a current rise ≥1010 A·s−1 are presented. Besides the current through the probe and the voltage across it, the diameter of the wire material and its surface temperature have been measured. The final aim of this investigation is the determination of the thermophysical properties of a high-melting liquid metal up to its critical point. Here a first step should be made to demonstrate the reliability of the method and to justify the crucial assumptions. To determine the limits for the applicability of a homogeneous approach used so far, a one-dimensional numerical model in Z-pinch geometry has been used which gives the time evolution of the profiles of temperature, density, and pressure across the wire. The model describes well the main features observed in these experiments. A physical explanation for the maximum in the time dependences of the surface temperature is proposed. This behavior is related to special thermodynamic properties of a two-phase (liquid–gas) mixture forming in a peripheral layer around the liquid metal. The temperature limit is determined for which there are no remarkable gradients of temperature and density across the wire. The specific heat, the thermal expansion coefficient, and the electrical as well as thermal conductivity of liquid tungsten can now, in principle, be obtained. The parameters of the critical point of the liquid-vapor phase transition can also be estimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. Kloss, T. Motzke, R. Grossjohann, and H. Hess, Phys. Rev. E 54:5851 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. R. Gathers, Rep. Prog. Phys. 49:341 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. S. Hixson and M. A. Winkler, Int. J. Thermophys. 11:709 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goodfellow GmbH Catalog (1996/1997), p. 261.

  5. A. V. Bushman, V. S. Vorob'ev, A. D. Rakhel, and V. E. Fortov, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 35:1079 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. V. Bushman, V. S. Vorob'ev, V. N. Korobenko, A. D. Rakhel, A. I. Savvatimskii, and V. E. Fortov, Int. J. Thermophys. 14:565 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. D. Rakhel, Int. J. Thermophys. 17:1011 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. G. Hoover, G. Stell, E. Goldmark, and G. D. Degani, J. Chem. Phys. 63:5434 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. A. Young, UCRL-52352 (Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, 1977).

  10. V. S. Vorob'ev and A. D. Rakhel, Teplofiz. Vys. Temp. 28:18 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. K. Godunov, A. V. Zabrodin, M. Ya. Ivanov, A. N. Kraiko, and G. A. Prokopov, Numerical Solution of Many-Dimensional Gas Dynamic Tasks (Nauka, Moscow, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. A. Samarski and Yu. P. Popov, Difference Methods for Solution of Gas Dynamic Tasks (Nauka, Moscow, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Hess, E. Kaschnitz, and G. Pottlacher, High Press. Res. 12:29 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kloss, A., Rakhel, A.D. & Hess, H. Experimental Results on Tungsten-Wire Explosions in Air at Atmospheric Pressure—Comparison with a One-Dimensional Numerical Model. International Journal of Thermophysics 19, 983–991 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022619829139

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022619829139

Navigation