Abstract
Prevailing myths concerning wife abuse generally tend to blame the victim. The present study examines the degree of responsibility assigned by police officers to the wife, the husband, as well as the couple's socioeconomic situation in cases of wife abuse. The officer's position (neutral vs supportive) adopted toward the woman is also investigated. The influence of eight characteristics related either to the spouses or to the situation of violence on both the officer's position and the attribution of responsibility is analyzed. The characteristics are: couple's socioeconomic status, type of household, drinking by husband, alleged antagonism on the part of the wife, ambivalence of wife to press charges, type of abuse, history of assault, and violence toward children. The results are based on answers to case vignettes provided by 235 municipal police officers. The data were analyzed by performing a multivariate analysis of variance. Results indicate the type of abuse to be the characteristic with the greatest impact on police attitudes. While the husband is systematically considered more responsible than the wife, police officers always consider the wife somewhat responsible, particularly when there is alleged antagonism by the woman and when threats of violence are present.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, C. S. (1980). The responsible victim: Nurses' perceptions of victims of rape.J. Health Social Behav. 21: 22–33.
Alexander, C. S., and Backer, H. (1978). The use of vignettes in survey research.Pub. Opin. Quart. 42(1): 93–104.
Berk, R. A., Berk, S. F., Loseke, D. R., and Rauma, D. (1983). Mutual combat and other family violence myths. In Finkelhor, D., Genes, R. U., Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.),The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Violence Research, Sage, Beverly Hills.
Berk, R. A., Berk, S. F., and Newton, P. J. (1984). An empirical analysis of police responses to incidents of wife battery. Unpublished paper, Department of Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Berk, S., and Loseke, D. (1981). Handling family violence: Situational determinants of police arrest in domestic disturbances.Law Soc. Rev. 15(2): 317–346.
Breslin, W. J. (1978). Police intervention in domestic confrontations.J. Pol. Sci. Admin. 6(3): 293–302.
Brown, S. E. (1984). Police responses to wife beating: Neglect of a crime of violence.J. Crim. Just. 12: 277–288.
Burris, C. (1983).Commonly Believed Myths About Battering, Women's Advocacy Clinic, London, Ontario.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 38(2): 217–230.
Cannings, M. (1984). Myths and stereotypes—Obstacles to effective police intervention in domestic disputes involving a battered woman.Pol. J. 57(1): 43–56.
Cochran, W. G., and Cox, G. M. (1957).Experimental Designs (second edition), Wiley, New York.
Corenblum, B. (1983). Reactions to alcohol-related marital violence.J. Studies Alcohol 44(4): 665–674.
Davis, P. W. (1981). Structured rationales for non-arrest: Police stereotypes of the domestic disturbance.Crim. Just. Rev. 6(2): 8–15.
Davis, P. W. (1983). Restoring the semblance of order: Police strategies in the domestic disturbance.Symbol. Interact. 6(2): 261–278.
Dolon, R., Hendricks, J., and Meagher, M. S. (1986). Police practices and attitudes toward domestic violence.J. Pol. Sci. Admin., 14(3): 187–192.
Gault, C. (1980). Le rôle du policier dans des conflits familiaux—Entrevue avec le sous-chef de la police de Détroit, M. James Bannon.J. Coll. Pol. 4(3): 198–203.
Hatty, S. E. (1988).Male Violence and the Police. An Australian Experience, School of Social Work, University of New South Wales, Kensington.
Heverly, M. A., Fitt, D. X., and Newman, F. L. (1984). Constructing case vignettes for evaluating clinical judgment: An empirical model.Eval. Progr. Plan. 7: 45–55.
Homant, R. J. (1985). The police and spouse abuse: A review of recent findings.Police Studies 8(3): 163–172.
International Association of Chiefs of Police (1985). Spouse abuse—Dynamics and intervention strategies.Training Key 352: 1–6.
Kennedy, D. B., and Homant, R. J. (1983). Attitudes of abused women toward male and female police officers.Crim. Just. Behav. 10: 391–405.
Larouche, G. (1985).Guide d'intervention aupres des femmes violentées, Corporation des travailleurs sociaux du Québec, Montréal.
Kalmus, D. (1979). The attribution of responsibility in a wife abuse context.Victimology 4(2): 284–291.
Klingbeil, K. S., and Boyd, V. D. (1984). Emergency room intervention: Detection, assessment and treatment. In Roberts, A. R. (ed.),Battered Women and Their Families. Intervention Strategies and Treatment Programs, Springer, New York.
Martin, G., Lavoie, F., and Jacob, M. (1988).La violence faite aux femmes en milieu conjugal: Etude menée aupres des intervenant-e-spsychosociaux-ales et des policiers. (Cahier de recherche 15). Québec: Université Lavai, Groupe de recherche multidisciplinaire féministe.
Richardson, D. C., and Campbell, J. L. (1980). Alcohol and wife abuse: The effect of alcohol on attributions of blame for wife abuse.Personal. Social Psychol. Bull. 6: 51–56.
Rose, K. (1984). Physicians' and nurses' attitudes toward women abuse. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin).Diss. Abstr. Int.
Shaver, K. G., and Drown, D. (1986). On causality, responsibility and self-blame: A theorical note.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 50: 697–702.
Sinclair, D. (1985).Pour comprendre le probleme des femmes battues: Guide de formation pour les conseillers et les intervenants, Ministère des services sociaux et communautaires, Gouvernement de l'Ontario, Toronto.
Summers, G., and Feldman, S. (1984). Blaming the victim versus blaming the perpetrator: An attributional analysis of spouse abuse.J. Social Clin. Psychol. 2(4): 339–347.
Waaland, P., and Keeley, S. (1985). Police decision-making in wife abuse: The impact of legal and extralegal factors.Law Human Behav. 9(4): 355–366.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lavoie, F., Jacob, M., Hardy, J. et al. Police attitudes in assigning responsibility for wife abuse. J Fam Viol 4, 369–388 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00978577
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00978577