Skip to main content
Log in

Police attitudes in assigning responsibility for wife abuse

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prevailing myths concerning wife abuse generally tend to blame the victim. The present study examines the degree of responsibility assigned by police officers to the wife, the husband, as well as the couple's socioeconomic situation in cases of wife abuse. The officer's position (neutral vs supportive) adopted toward the woman is also investigated. The influence of eight characteristics related either to the spouses or to the situation of violence on both the officer's position and the attribution of responsibility is analyzed. The characteristics are: couple's socioeconomic status, type of household, drinking by husband, alleged antagonism on the part of the wife, ambivalence of wife to press charges, type of abuse, history of assault, and violence toward children. The results are based on answers to case vignettes provided by 235 municipal police officers. The data were analyzed by performing a multivariate analysis of variance. Results indicate the type of abuse to be the characteristic with the greatest impact on police attitudes. While the husband is systematically considered more responsible than the wife, police officers always consider the wife somewhat responsible, particularly when there is alleged antagonism by the woman and when threats of violence are present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, C. S. (1980). The responsible victim: Nurses' perceptions of victims of rape.J. Health Social Behav. 21: 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. S., and Backer, H. (1978). The use of vignettes in survey research.Pub. Opin. Quart. 42(1): 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A., Berk, S. F., Loseke, D. R., and Rauma, D. (1983). Mutual combat and other family violence myths. In Finkelhor, D., Genes, R. U., Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.),The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Violence Research, Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A., Berk, S. F., and Newton, P. J. (1984). An empirical analysis of police responses to incidents of wife battery. Unpublished paper, Department of Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, S., and Loseke, D. (1981). Handling family violence: Situational determinants of police arrest in domestic disturbances.Law Soc. Rev. 15(2): 317–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, W. J. (1978). Police intervention in domestic confrontations.J. Pol. Sci. Admin. 6(3): 293–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. E. (1984). Police responses to wife beating: Neglect of a crime of violence.J. Crim. Just. 12: 277–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burris, C. (1983).Commonly Believed Myths About Battering, Women's Advocacy Clinic, London, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 38(2): 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannings, M. (1984). Myths and stereotypes—Obstacles to effective police intervention in domestic disputes involving a battered woman.Pol. J. 57(1): 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G., and Cox, G. M. (1957).Experimental Designs (second edition), Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corenblum, B. (1983). Reactions to alcohol-related marital violence.J. Studies Alcohol 44(4): 665–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. W. (1981). Structured rationales for non-arrest: Police stereotypes of the domestic disturbance.Crim. Just. Rev. 6(2): 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. W. (1983). Restoring the semblance of order: Police strategies in the domestic disturbance.Symbol. Interact. 6(2): 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolon, R., Hendricks, J., and Meagher, M. S. (1986). Police practices and attitudes toward domestic violence.J. Pol. Sci. Admin., 14(3): 187–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gault, C. (1980). Le rôle du policier dans des conflits familiaux—Entrevue avec le sous-chef de la police de Détroit, M. James Bannon.J. Coll. Pol. 4(3): 198–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatty, S. E. (1988).Male Violence and the Police. An Australian Experience, School of Social Work, University of New South Wales, Kensington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heverly, M. A., Fitt, D. X., and Newman, F. L. (1984). Constructing case vignettes for evaluating clinical judgment: An empirical model.Eval. Progr. Plan. 7: 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homant, R. J. (1985). The police and spouse abuse: A review of recent findings.Police Studies 8(3): 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Association of Chiefs of Police (1985). Spouse abuse—Dynamics and intervention strategies.Training Key 352: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. B., and Homant, R. J. (1983). Attitudes of abused women toward male and female police officers.Crim. Just. Behav. 10: 391–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larouche, G. (1985).Guide d'intervention aupres des femmes violentées, Corporation des travailleurs sociaux du Québec, Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmus, D. (1979). The attribution of responsibility in a wife abuse context.Victimology 4(2): 284–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingbeil, K. S., and Boyd, V. D. (1984). Emergency room intervention: Detection, assessment and treatment. In Roberts, A. R. (ed.),Battered Women and Their Families. Intervention Strategies and Treatment Programs, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G., Lavoie, F., and Jacob, M. (1988).La violence faite aux femmes en milieu conjugal: Etude menée aupres des intervenant-e-spsychosociaux-ales et des policiers. (Cahier de recherche 15). Québec: Université Lavai, Groupe de recherche multidisciplinaire féministe.

  • Richardson, D. C., and Campbell, J. L. (1980). Alcohol and wife abuse: The effect of alcohol on attributions of blame for wife abuse.Personal. Social Psychol. Bull. 6: 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, K. (1984). Physicians' and nurses' attitudes toward women abuse. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin).Diss. Abstr. Int.

  • Shaver, K. G., and Drown, D. (1986). On causality, responsibility and self-blame: A theorical note.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 50: 697–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, D. (1985).Pour comprendre le probleme des femmes battues: Guide de formation pour les conseillers et les intervenants, Ministère des services sociaux et communautaires, Gouvernement de l'Ontario, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, G., and Feldman, S. (1984). Blaming the victim versus blaming the perpetrator: An attributional analysis of spouse abuse.J. Social Clin. Psychol. 2(4): 339–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waaland, P., and Keeley, S. (1985). Police decision-making in wife abuse: The impact of legal and extralegal factors.Law Human Behav. 9(4): 355–366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lavoie, F., Jacob, M., Hardy, J. et al. Police attitudes in assigning responsibility for wife abuse. J Fam Viol 4, 369–388 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00978577

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00978577

Key words

Navigation