Skip to main content
Log in

A performance-based management system to reduce prematurity and low birth weight

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A performance system is a management tool for ensuring that programs accomplish their objectives. Using Delphi and nominal group process techniques, the authors established objectives for a system to reduce prematurity and low birth weight. A task force consisting of state, regional, and local public health personnel, consultants from the Centers for Disease Control, and faculty from the School of Public Health then developed the activities, standards, and guidelines of the performance system. Finally, an assessment tool for evaluation of the system was designed. The system, which is intended to complement initiatives to improve the medical care of maternity patients, should be useful to maternity clinic managers and supervisors who wish to develop performance standards specifically targeted to the achievement of objectives for reducing prematurity and low birth weight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kleinman, J. C., Trends and variations in birth weight.National Center for Health Statistics, Health, United States, 1981 (DHHS Pub. No. (PHS)82-1232, Public Health Service), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., December 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Center for Health Statistics, Health, United States, 1984 (DHHS Pub. No. (PHS)85-1232, Public Health Service), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., December 1984.

  3. Buescher, P. A.,The Impact of Low Birth Weight on North Carolina Neonatal Mortality (SCHS Studies, No. 30), NC Department of Human Resources, Division of Health Services, State Center for Health Statistics, Raleigh, North Carolina, December 1983, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. State Center for Health Statistics,Basic Automated Birth Yearbook, North Carolina Residents, 1982, Department of Human Resources, Division of Health Services, Raleigh, North Carolina, n.d.

  5. Wegman, M. E., Annual summary of vital statistics—1982.Pediatrics 72:755–765, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Poister, T. H., Performance monitoring in the evaluation process.Eval. Rev. 6:602–623, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blair, L. H., Hatry, H. P., Bonn, K., et al.,Monitoring the Impacts of Prison and Parole Services, Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hatry, H. P., Clarren, S. N., Vanhooten, T., et al.,Efficiency Measurement for Local Government Services, Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hatry, H. P., Blair, L. H., Fisk, D. M., et al.,How Effective Are Your Community Services? Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Millar, A., Hatry, H., and Moss, K.,Monitoring the Outcomes of Social Services, Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schainblatt, A. H.,Monitoring the Outcomes of States Mental Treatment Programs, Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Waller, J. D., Kemp, D. M., Scanlon, J. W., et al.,Monitoring for Government Agencies, Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wholey, J. S., Evaluation: Promise and performance, Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Crocetti, A. F., Goodman, J. A., and Olendzki, M. C.,Manual for Performance Appraisal of Public Health Disease Control Programs, TARP Institute, Washington, D.C., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Crocetti, A. F., Goodman, J. A., and Olendzki, M. C.,Final Report Concerning Technical Aspects of N.S.F. Contract C-888, Services, Measurement, Health, TARP Institute, Washington, D.C., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hauver, J. H., and Goodman, J. A., The evaluation of performance and cost in an hypertension control program.Med. Care 18:485–502, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Delbecq, A., VandeVen, A., and Gustafson, D.,Group Techniques for Program Planning Scott, Foresman, Glenview, Illinois, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Linstone, H. A., and Turoff, M., eds.,The Delphi Method. Techniques and Applications Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jain, S. C.,The Delphi Technique. Department of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, n.d. (Mimeo)

  20. Abrantes, A. V.,Performance Management Systems as Managerial Tools for Local Health Departments, Unpublished dissertation, University of North Carolina, Department of Health Policy and Administration, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kotch, J.B., Burr, C., Toal, S. et al. A performance-based management system to reduce prematurity and low birth weight. J Med Syst 10, 375–394 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992438

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992438

Keywords

Navigation