Skip to main content
Log in

Nutritional parameters and yield evaluation of newly developed genotypes of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)

  • Published:
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among the commonly consumed food legumes, lentils occupy an important place in human nutrition in the Indian subcontinent. Twenty-one lentil genotypes were evaluated for such nutrition related parameters as moisture, protein, crude fiber, fat, ash (total mineral matter), carbohydrates, total energy and metabolizable energy. These genotypes were also analyzed for 100-seed weight and seed yield/plant. Protein content ranged between 22.1 and 27.4% with significant differences among genotypes. Considerable variations were observed among the genotypes for calcium, phosphorus, iron and tannin contents. Large variations existed in yield and 100-seed weight of these genotypes. Seed yield/plant was not significantly correlated with any of the principal seed constituents analyzed in the present study. The genotypes, LH 97 and LH 37 were found to be better and hence could be explored for further development and selection of desirable characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhatty RS (1988) Composition and quality of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.): A review. Can Inst Food Sci Technol J 21(2): 144–160.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dhindsa KS, Sood DR, Chaudhary MS (1985) Nutritional evaluation of some varieties of lentil (Lens esculenta). The Ind J Nutr Dietet 22: 186–189.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Khan MA, Rana IA, Ullah I, Jaffery S (1987) Physico-chemical characters and nutrient composition of some improved lines of lentils grown in Pakistan. J Food Comp and Anal 1: 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma AK, Singh B, Saxena AK, Bakshi AK, Verma MM (1989) Variation and association amongst lentil cooking characteristics. LENS Newsletter 16(2): 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bhatty RS (1984) Relationship between physical and chemical characters and cooking quality in lentil. J Agric Food Chem 32: 1161–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  6. AOAC (1984) Official Methods of Analysis. 14th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bolton W, Blair R (1974) Poultry Nutrition, Bulletin 174, 4th ed. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burn RE (1971) Methods for estimation of tannin in grain sorghum. Agron J 63: 511–512.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dickman SR, Bray RH (1940) Colorimetric determination of phosphate. Ind Engg Chem Anal Ed 12: 665–670.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Panse VN, Sukhatme PV (1985) Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. 4th ed. New Delhi: Publications and Information Division, ICAR.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sood DR, Ahlawat TR, Singh KP (1989) Relationship between protein quality and cooking characteristics in mung-mash amphidiploids. Legume Research 12(1): 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kochhar A, Hira CK (1997) Nutritional and cooking evaluation of greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) cultivars. J Food Sci Technol 34(4): 328–330.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sood DR, Tek Ram, Dhindsa KS (1991) Nutritional and cooking evaluation of blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Bull Grain Technol 29(2): 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Singh S, Singh HD, Sikka KC (1968) Distribution of nutrients in the anatomical parts of common Indian pulses. Cereal Chem 45: 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sosulski FW, Garratt MD, Slinkard AE (1976) Functional properties of ten legume flours. Can Inst Food sci Technol J 9: 66.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shahen N, Roushdi M, Hassan RA (1978) Studies on lentil starch. Staerke 30: 148.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Solanki IS, Thomas G, Sood DR, Ahlawat TR (1997) Variation and association among different physical, physico-chemical and quality traits in lentils (Lens culinaris Medik.). In Symposium on Tropical Crop Research and Development, India – International. Trichur, Kerala, India: International Society for Tropical Crop Research and Development (ISTCRAD), Sept 9–12, 1997.

  18. Sood DR, Dhindsa KS (1986) Studies on food value of some varieties of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp). Bull Grain Technol 24(2): 114–119.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Singh J, Sood DR (1997) Nutritional evaluation of rabi French beans. J Food Sci Technol 34(4): 354–356.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Malhotra RS, Sharma AK, Saxena AK (1982) A note on the chemical composition of improved genotypes of lentils. LENS Newsletter 9: 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Claudio CB, Claudio CK, Stella MA (1983) Comparative study of the bromatological properties of lentils (Lens culinaris) and ‘falsa lenteja’ [(Vicia sativa ssp. abovata (Ser.) Gaudin]. Agricultura Tecnica (Chile) 43: 185.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gopalan C, Ramasastri BV, Balasubramanian SC (1976) Nutritive value of Indian Foods. Hyderabad, India: National Institute of Nutrition, ICMR.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vailancourt R, Slinkard AE, Reichert RD (1986) The inheritance of condensed tannin concentration in lentil. Can J Plant Sci 66: 241–246.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solanki, I., Kapoor, A. & Singh, U. Nutritional parameters and yield evaluation of newly developed genotypes of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). Plant Foods Hum Nutr 54, 79–87 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008182302900

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008182302900

Navigation