Skip to main content
Log in

Haloperidol- and apomorphine-induced changes in pup searching behaviour of house mice

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maternal pup searching behaviour of lactating house mice treated with apomorphine, haloperidol or saline was examined on a running board with a central depression as a nest. Pup searching was elicited by artificial ultrasonic stimuli: a female moved out from the nest either towards a 50 kHz tone (key stimulus) which is adequate to activate species specific pup searching behaviour or towards a 20 kHz tone (neutral stimulus), thus showing her preference for one of these stimuli. Under apomorphine (0.00625; 0.0125; 0.025 mg/kg) the females preferred the key stimulus. Nevertheless apomorphine (0.00625–0.025 mg/kg) prolonged response latencies and shortened the duration of pup searching. At the highest dose (0.05 mg/kg), apomorphine induced stereotyped sniffing. Haloperidol (0.025; 0.05; 0.1 mg/kg) had opposite effects to apomorphine: it lowered the threshold for elicitation, shortened response latencies and prolonged the duration of pup searching. Females treated with haloperidol (0.025–0.1 mg/kg) did not prefer the key stimulus. Changes in response elicitation and in the performance of pup searching induced by apomorphine and haloperidol, respectively, were assumed to be due to i) a reduced and an increased responsiveness to external stimuli respectively, ii) an enhanced and a reduced tendency for response switching respectively, and iii) a preference for spontaneous behaviour in apomorphine-treated females, with an increased dependence on exteroceptive stimuli following haloperidol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cools AR (1980) Role of the neostriatal dopaminergic activity in sequencing and selecting behavioural strategies: facilitation of processes involved in selecting the best strategy in a stressful situation. Behav Brain Res 1:361–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehret G (1974) Age-dependent hearing loss in normal hearing mice. Naturwissenschaften 61:506

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehret G, Haack B (1982) Ultrasound recognition in house mice: key-stimulus configuration and recognition mechanism. J Comp Physiol 148:245–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehret G, Haack B (1984) Motivation and arousal influence sound-induced maternal pup retrieving behavior in lactating house mice. Z Tierpsychol 65:25–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehret G, Koch M, Haack B, Markl H (1987) Sex and parental experience determine the onset of an instinctive behavior in mice. Naturwissenschaften 74:47–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Fray PJ, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW, Koob GF, Iversen SD (1980) An observational method for quantifying the behavioural effects of dopamine agonists: contrasting effects of d-amphetamine and apomorphine. Psychopharmacology 69:253–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers R, Schwarz M, Sontag K-H, Cools AR (1984) Caudate nucleus and programming behaviour in cats: role of dopamine in switching motor patterns. Behav Brain Res 14:17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley AE, Winnock M, Stinus L (1986) Amphetamine, apomorphine and investigatory behavior in the rat: analysis of the structure and pattern of responses. Psychopharmacology 88:66–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon M, Robbins TW (1975) The action of central nervous system stimulant drugs: a general theory concerning amphetamine effects. In: Essman W, Valzeli C (eds) Current developments in psychopharmacology 2. Spectrum, New York, pp 79–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon N, Mejsholm B, Lyon M (1986) Stereotyped responding by schizophrenic outpatients: cross-cultural confirmation of perseverative switching on a two-choice task. J Psychiatr Res 20, No 2:137–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore K (1978) Amphetamines: biochemical and behavioral actions in animals. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology 11. Plenum Press, New York, pp 41–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton S (1967) An analysis of cat behavior using chlorpromazine and amphetamine. Int J Neuropharmacol 6:307–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ (1983) Behavioral effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs: clinical and neuropsychological implications. In: Creese I (ed) Stimulants: neurochemical, behavioral, and clinical perspectives. Raven Press, New York, pp 301–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt WJ (1984) l-dopa and apomorphine disrupt long- but not short-behavioural chains. Physiol Behav 33:671–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrijmoed-de Vries M (1985) Programming motor and non motor behaviour: role of striatum in animals. Masterthesis, Nijmegen, pp 67–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Zippelius HM, Schleidt WM (1956) Ultraschallaute bei jungen Mäusen. Naturwissenschaften 21:1–2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wegener, S., Schmidt, W.J. & Ehret, G. Haloperidol- and apomorphine-induced changes in pup searching behaviour of house mice. Psychopharmacology 95, 271–275 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174523

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174523

Key words

Navigation