Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evidence for perceptual masking of the discriminative morphine stimulus

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Morphine-amphetamine and morphine-naltrexone interactions were examined in three groups of White Carneaux pigeons (n=3), which were trained in a twochoice drug discrimination procedure under a FR-30 schedule of food reinforcement using 3.2 mg/kg morphine and saline as discriminative stimuli. Once stimulus control was acquired by these initial training stimuli, the training doses of morphine were gradually changed to 1.0 mg/kg for group A and to 10 mg/kg for group C. The three groups differed in the minimum dose required for stimulus control and the drugs to which the training stimulus generalized. Stimulus generalization to amphetamine was inversely related to training dose. Amphetamine potentiated the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine. Naltrexone blocked the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine to varying degrees, which appeared to be limited by the training dose and the rate-suppressing effects of naltrexone when administered alone. Challenging the morphine stimulus with amphetamine resulted in a qualitatively similar blockade. This blockade was a direct function of the morphine training dose. It is argued that MS-AMP interactions result in perceptual masking of the MS stimulus, which can be differentiated from pharmacological antagonism by NTX. Two other challenge drugs, ketamine, and sodium pentobarbital, did not alter stimulus control by morphine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appel JB, Kuhn DM, White FJ (1978) Dual receptor mediation of the discriminative stimulus properties of pentazocine. In: Ho BT, Richards DW, Chute DL (eds) Drug discrimination and state-dependent learning. Academic Press, New York, pp 149–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry III H (1974) Classification of drugs according to their discriminable effects in rats. Fed Proc 33:1814–1824

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne RG (1981) Anxiolytics antagonize yohimbine's discriminative stimulus properties. Psychopharmacology 74:245–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne RG, Weisman A (1981) Discriminative stimulus properties of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol: mechanistic studies. J Clin Pharm 21:227S-234S

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne RG, Welch WM (1982) Stereoselective antagonism of phencyclidine's discriminative properties by adenosine receptor agonists. Science 217:1157–1159

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC (1986) Drug discrimination: behavioral, pharmacological, and molecular mechanisms of discriminative drug effects. In: Goldberg SR, Stolerman IP (eds) Behavioral analysis of drug dependence. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 161–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC, Janssen, PAJ (1982) Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: Limits of discriminability and the role of progressively decreasing training dose in cocaine-saline discrimination. Neuropharmacology 21:1187–1194

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJE, Jannssen PAJ (1976) Fentanyl and apomorphine: asymmetrical generalization of discriminative stimulus properties. Neuropharmacology 15:541–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJE, Kuyps JJMC, Janssen PAJ (1977a) Narcotic cue and narcotic state: differential involvement of brain 5-hydroxytryptamine. Neuropharmacology 16:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJE, Janssen PAJ (1977b) Effects of alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine, adrenolytic compounds pimozide, and other neuroleptics on the narcotic cue. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 225:308–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC, Niemeggers CJE, Janssen PAJ (1980) Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: limits of discriminability and the role of a progressively decreasing training dose in fentanylsaline discrimination. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 213:474–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JR, Bloom FE, Roth RH (1986) The biochemical basis of neuropharmacology. 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Mello GD, Stolerman IP (1977) Comparison of the discriminative properties of cocaine and amphetamine in rats. Br J Pharmacol 61:415–422

    Google Scholar 

  • France CP, Woods JH (1985a) Effects of morpine, naltrexone, and dextroorphan in untreated and morphine-treated pigeons. Psychopharmacology 85:377–382

    Google Scholar 

  • France CP, Woods JH (1985b) Antagonism and rate-suppressing effects of opioid antagonists in the pigeon. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 235:442–447

    Google Scholar 

  • France CP, Woods JH (1985c) Opiate agonist-antagonist, interactions: applications of a three-key drug discrimination procedure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 234:81–89

    Google Scholar 

  • France CP, Jacobsen, AE, Woods JH (1984) Discriminative stimulus effects of reversible and irreversible opitate agonists: morphine, oxymorphazone, and buprenorphine. J Pharmacol. Exp Ther 230:652–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauvin DV, Young AM (1988) Perceptual masking of drug stimuli. Drug Dev Res (in press)

  • Gauvin DV, Young AM (1989) Effects of prior saline-morphine discrimination by pigeons on three-way discrimination including two morphine doses. Psychopharmacology 98:222–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianutsos G, Lal H (1975) Effect of loperamide, haloperidol, and methadone in rats trained to discriminate morphine from saline. Psychopharmacology 41:267–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianutsos G, Lal H (1976) Selective interaction of drugs with a discriminable stimulus associated with narcotic action. Life Sci 19:88–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Herling S, Coale EH, Valentino RJ, Hein DW, Woods JH (1980) Narcotic discrimination in pigeons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 214:139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Herling S, Valentino RJ, Solomon RF, Woods JH (1984) Narcotic discrimination in pigeons: antagonism by naltrexone. Eur J Pharmacol 105:137–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman SG (1984) Discriminative stimulus properties of opioids that interact with mu, kappa, and PCP/sigma receptors. In: Seiden LS, Balster RL (eds) Behavioral pharmacology: the current status. Liss, New York, pp 131–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt DE, Lipton DS, Goldsmith D, Strug DL (1984) Street pharmacology: uses of heroin and cocaine in the treatment of addiction. Drug Alcohol Depend 13:375–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Järbe TUC (1978) Discriminative stimulus properties of morphine in the pigeon. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 9:411–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski DR, Preston KL (1986) Evaluation of mixtures of morphine and d-amphetamine for subjective and physiological effects. Drug Alcohol Depend 17:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline FS, Young AM (1986) M. Differential modification of pentobarbital stimulus control by d-amphetamine and ethanol. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 25:1305–1313

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolers PA (1983) Perception and representation. Annu Rev Psychol 34:129–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimmer ED, McGuire MS, Barry III H (1984) Effects of training dose on generalization of morphine stimulus to clonidine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 20:669–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal H (1977) Drug-induced discriminable stimulus: past research and future perspectives. In: Lal H (ed) Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. Plenum Press, New York, pp 207–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal H, Gianutsos G, Miksic S (1977) Discriminable stimuli produced by analgesics. In: Lal H (ed) Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. Plenum Press, New York, pp 23–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge GE, Foley JM (1980) Contrast masking in human vision. J Opt Soc Am [A] 70:1458–1470

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarten MD, Lal H (1979) Attenuation of the discriminative stimulus strength of morphine by haloperidol. Neuropharmacology 18:465–467

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan DE, Wolf PS, Carchman RA (1970) Antagonism of the behavioral effects of morphine and methadone by narcotic antagonists in the pigeon. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 175:443–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Miksic S, Shearman G, Lal H (1978) Generalization study with some narcotic and nonnarcotic drugs in rats trained for morphine-saline discrimination. Psychopharmacology 60:103–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Miksic S, Shearman GT, Lal H (1980) Differential enhancement of narcotic discrimination and analgesia by amphetamine and haloperidol: an evidence for distinct mechanisms underlying analgesia and euphoria. Subst Alcohol Actions/Misuse 1:281–285

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connel RJ (1985) Responses to pheronome blends in insect olfactory receptor neurons. J Comp Physiol 156:747–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1974) Experminetal methods for the study of statedependent learning. Fed Proc 33:1800–1813

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1979) Drug discrimination training with progressively lowered doses. Science 205:720–721

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1984) State dependent learning and drug discrimination. In: Iverson LL, Iverson SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology, vol. 18. Plenum Press, New York, pp 59–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1987) Applications and limitations of the drug discrimination method for the study of drug abuse. In: Bozarth MA (ed) Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg Tokyo, pp 291–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosecrans JA, Goodloe MH, Bennett GJ, Hirschhorn ID (1973) Morphine as a discriminative cue: effects of amine depletors and nalaxone. Eur J Pharmacol 21:252–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon HE, Holtzman SG (1979) Morphine training dose: a determinant of stimulus generalization to narcotic antagonists in the rat. Psychopharmacology 61:239–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling G (1965) Temporal and spatial visual masking. I. Masking by impulse flashes. J Opt Soc Am 55:541–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Strug DL, Hunt DE, Goldsmith DS, Lipton DS, Spunt B (1985) Patterns of cocaine usage among methadone clients. Int J Addict 20:1163–1175

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg MDB, Järbe TUC (1982) Morphine, cue saliency: limits of discriminability and third state perception by pigeons. In: Colpaert FC, Slangen JL (eds) Drug discrimination: applications in CNS pharmacology. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp 147–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallerida RJ, Jacob LS (1979) The dose-response relation in pharmacology. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentino RJ, Herling S, Woods JH (1981) The relationship between the acute effects of narcotic antagonists and the narcoticdependent state. Psychopharmacol Bull 17:51–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegel RL, Lane CE (1924) The auditory masking of one pure tone by another and it probable relation to the dynamics of the inner ear. Physiol Rev (Ser 2) 23:266–285

    Google Scholar 

  • White FJ, Appel JB (1982) Training dose as a factor in LSD-saline discrimination. Psychopharmacology 76:20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • White JM, Holtzman SG (1982) Properties of pentazocine as a discriminative stimulus in the squirrel monkey. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 233:396–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods JH, France CP, Bertalmio, AJ, Gmerek DE, Winger G (1984) Behavioral assessment of insurmountable narcotic agonists and antagonists. In: Seiden LS, Balster RL (eds) Behavioral pharmacology: the current status. Liss, New York, pp 75–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Young AM, Woods JH (1982) Limitations on the antagonistic actions of opioid antagonists. Fed Proc 41:2333–2338

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwislocki JJ (1978) Masking: experimental and theoretical aspects of simultaneous, forward, and central masking. In: Carterette EC, Friedman MP (eds) Handbook of perception, IV. Academic Press, Inc., New York, pp 283–334

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, Wayne State University, 48202, Detroit, MI, USA

    David V. Gauvin & Alice M. Young

Authors
  1. David V. Gauvin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alice M. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gauvin, D.V., Young, A.M. Evidence for perceptual masking of the discriminative morphine stimulus. Psychopharmacology 98, 212–221 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00444694

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00444694

Key words

Search

Navigation