Summary
An electrophysiological method was employed to measure the minima visibilia (single line acuity) of single tectal units. According to the minima visibilia determined at different distances the rabbit's eye has an emmetropic refractive state. By applying drugs preventing accommodation it was shown that no measurable accommodation occurs in the rabbit's eye.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Collewijn, H.: Optokinetic eye movements in the rabbit, input-output relations. Vision Res.9, 117–132 (1969).
Flemming, W.: Arch. mikr. Anat.4, 365–372 (1868); cited after W. Krause: Anatomie des Kaninchens. Leipzig: Engelmann 1884.
Glickstein, M., Millodot, M.: Retinoscopy and eye size. Science168, 605–606 (1970).
Hess, C.: Gesichtssinn. In: Handbuch der vergleichenden Physiologie, Bd. 4. Ed. Hans Winterstein. Jena: Fischer 1913.
Kahmann, H.: Untersuchungen über Linse, Zonula ciliaris, Refraktion und Akkommodation von Säugetieren. Zool. Jb. allg. Zool.48, 507–588 (1930).
Marler, P., Hamilton, W. J.: Mechanisms of animal behavior. New York: Wiley 1966.
Meyer, D. L., Schwassmann, H. O.: Electrophysiological method for determination of refractive state in fish eyes. Vision Res.10, 1301–1303 (1970).
Nicolas, E.: Veterinary and comparative ophthalmology. London: Brown 1930.
Schneider, D.: Die Biologie der Wirbeltieraugen. Studium generale10, 214–230 (1957).
Smith, P.: On accommodation in the rabbit. Ophthal. Rev.27, 287–296 (1898).
Verrier, M. L.: La vision des Vertebres et les Theories de la Vision. Ann. Biol. Ser. 324, 209–239 (1948).
Walls, G. L.: The vertebrate eye and its adaptive radiation. Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bulletin No. 19, Bloomfield Hills, 1942.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by a grant from the “Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft” (S.F.B. 33)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meyer, D.L., Meyer-Hamme, S. & Schaefer, K.P. Electrophysiological investigation of refractive state and accommodation in the rabbit's eye. Pflugers Arch. 332, 80–86 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603816
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603816