Skip to main content
Log in

Intercomparison study on milk powder fortified with PCDD and PCDF

  • Lectures And Main Contributions
  • Published:
Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In order to find out the state of the art of dioxin analyses in cow's milk the BCR has organised an intercomparison in native and fortified milk-powders. The preparation of the milk-powder batches is described. Laboratories (n=11) have used their own in-house methods and standards. The use of a high resolution MS (R=10 000) was requested. An outline is given of how the results obtained were interpreted in discussions with the participants. A major problem in the quantification is the lack of certified standard solutions of all seventeen 2,3,7,8 congeners, this was shown during the analysis of the BCR standard solution. Recovery of the fortified dioxins from the milk-powders were in general between 80–90% of the added values. A further problem was the analysis of hepta and octa chlorinated congeners; for the calculation of international toxicological equivalent quantities (I-TEQ), larger variations in these did not significantly affect the total I-TEQ in milk-powder. Most of the participants were able to deliver satisfactory results for judging the acceptability of the milk for human consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Environmental Health Series 37; WHO Copenhagen 199

  2. Stephens RD, Rappe C, Hayward DG, Nygren M, Startin J, Esbøll A, Carlé J, Yrjänheikki E (1992) Anal Chem 64:3109–3117

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rappe C, Tartowski S, Yrjänheikki E (1989) Chemosphere 18:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Jong APJM, Dross A, Fürst P, Lindström G, Päpke O, Startin JR (1993) Fresenius J Anal Chem 345:72–77

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rymen T, Belliardo JJ, Gruepink B, Maier EA, Mal N, Lindsey AS (1993) Fresenius J Anal Chem (this issue)

  6. Van Zorge JA, van Wijnen JH, Theelen RMC, Olie K, van den Berg M (1989) Chemosphere 19:1881–1895

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ballschmiter K, Buchert H, Niemczijk R, Munden T, Swerew M (1986) Chemosphere 15:901–915

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schimmel, H., Griepink, B., Maier, E.A. et al. Intercomparison study on milk powder fortified with PCDD and PCDF. Fresenius J Anal Chem 348, 37–46 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00321602

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00321602

Keywords

Navigation