Skip to main content
Log in

MRI of orbital hydroxyapatite implants

  • Head and Neck Radiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our aim was to use MRI for the postsurgical assessment of a new form of integrated orbital implant composed of a porous calcium phosphate hydroxyapatite substrate. We studied ten patients 24–74 years of age who underwent enucleation and implantation of a hydroxyapatite ball; 5–13 months after surgery, each patient was examined by spinecho MRI, with fat suppression and gadolinium enhancement. Fibrovascular ingrowth was demonstrated in all ten patients as areas of enhancement at the periphery of the hydroxyapatite sphere that extended to the center to a variable degree. The radiologist should aware of the MRI appearances of the coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implant since it is now widely used following enucleation. MRI is a useful means to determine successful incorporation of the substrate into the orbital tissues. The normal pattern of contrast enhancement should not be mistaken for recurrent tumor or infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perry AC (1991) Advances in enucleation. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 4:173–182

    Google Scholar 

  2. Perry AC (1990) Integrated orbital implants. Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 8:75–81

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shields CL, Shields JA, De Potter P (1992) Hydroxyapatite orbital implant after enucleation. Experience with initial 100 consecutive cases. Arch Ophthalmol 110:333–338

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dutton JJ (1991) Coralline hydroxyapatite as an ocular implant. Ophthalmology 111:363–366

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Potter P, Shields CL, Shields JA, Flanders AE, Rao VM (1992) Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant. Ophthalmology 99:824–830

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gougelmann HP (1976) The evolution of the ocular motility implant. Int Ophthalmol Clin 10:689–711

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kenney EB, Lekovic V, Sa Ferreira JC, Han T, Dimitrijevic B, Carranza FA (1986) Bone formation within porous hydroxyapatite implants in human periodontal defects. J Periodontal 57:76–83

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shields CL, Shields JA, Eagle RC, De Potter P (1991) Histopathologic evidence of fibrovascular ingrowth four weeks after implantation of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant. Am J Ophthalmol 111:363–366

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gale ME, Vincent ME, Sutula FC (1985) Orbital implants and prostheses: postoperative computed tomographic appearance. AJNR 6:403–407

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weindling SM, Robinette CL, Wesley RE (1992) Porous hydroxyapatite in orbital reconstructive surgery: radiologic recognition. AJNR 13:239–240

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flanders, A.E., De Potter, P., Rao, V.M. et al. MRI of orbital hydroxyapatite implants. Neuroradiology 38, 273–277 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00596547

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00596547

Key words

Navigation