Skip to main content
Log in

Pseudotumoral cecum after hydrostatic reduction of intussusception

  • Originals
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors report two cases of intestinal intussusception successfully reduced by hydrostatic pressure. A postreduction filling defect in the cecum disappeared spontaneously on follow-up barium enema, and is therefore consistent with cecal edema. It appears an initial period of close observation for such cases is worthwhile, delaying the decision about surgery until after a follow-up barium enema; this may confirm the disappearance of the filling defect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkinson GO, Gay BB Jr, Naffis D (1976) Intussusception of the appendix in children. Am J Roentgenol 126: 1164

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carcassonne M, Roffe JL, Bonnet G (1977) L'invagination intestinale aiguë du nourrisson. Analyse d'une statistique. Ann Chir Infant 18: 453

    Google Scholar 

  3. Du INH (1978) Ten years' experience in the management of intussusception in infants and children by hydrostatic reduction. Can Med Assor J 119: 1075

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ein SH (1976) Leading points in childhood intussusception. J Pediatr Surg 11: 209

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eklöf OA, Johanson L, Löhr G (1980) Childhood intussusception: hydrostatic reductibility and incidence of leading points in different age groups. Pediatr Radiol 10: 83

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eklöf OA, Hogosson C (1976) Post evacuation findings in barium enema treated intussusceptions. Ann Radiol 19: 133

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fallis JC (1976) Intussusception in the older child. Can Med Assor J 114: 38

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frye TR, Howard WHR (1970) The handling of ileocolic intussusception in a pediatric medical center. Radiology 96: 187

    Google Scholar 

  9. Helardot P, Kalifa G (1981) L'invagination intestinale aiguë du nourrisson. Rev Prat (Paris) 31: 309

    Google Scholar 

  10. Martzloff KH (1926) Intussusception of the cecum coli. Arch Surg 13: 495

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pokorny WJ, Wagner RL, Harberg FJ (1980) Lateral wall cecal filling defects following successful hydrostatic reduction of cecalcolic intussusception. J Pediatr Surgery 15: 156

    Google Scholar 

  12. Valayer J (1972) Invagination intestinale aiguë de l'enfant. Gaz Med Fr 79: 1479

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wayne ER, Campbell JB, Burrington JD, Davis WS (1973) Management of 344 children with intussusception. Radiology 107: 597

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weisberger G, Mboumba A, Martin T, Boureau M (1976) Invaginations intestinales aiguës du nourrisson et de l'enfant. Réflexions tirées de l'étude de 200 observations. Rev Prat (Paris) 26: 2851

    Google Scholar 

  15. Williams HJ (1975) Intussusception; facts, fallacies and praticalities. Min Med 58: 140

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Devred, P., Faure, F. & Padovani, J. Pseudotumoral cecum after hydrostatic reduction of intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 14, 295–298 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01601879

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01601879

Keywords

Navigation