Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Scintigraphic evaluation of hepatic blood flow after intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In patients with liver cirrhosis a transjugularly placed intrahepatic portocaval shunt (TIPS) is a non-surgical portosystemic device which aims to reduce portal venons pressure. In comparison with Doppler sonography, we evaluated in 28 patients the diagnostic impact of liver perfusion scintigraphy (with technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid) in the assessment of changes in the hepatic blood flow after TIPS shunting. The arterial and portal contributions to hepatic flow were calculated from the areas under the biphasic timeactivity curve. In the course of TIPS shunting, patency is threatened by reocclusion. Angiography is the gold standard for TIPS shunt reassessment. However, there is a need for a less invasive diagnostic procedure, such as scintigraphy or Doppler sonography, for the early detection of shunt insufficiency. Scintigraphy demonstrated that prior to TIPS shunting the portal venons contribution to hepatic perfusion was reduced to 29.2%, this reduction being due to portal hypertension. After TIPS placement a significant increase in portal venous perfusion was observed (38.2%;P<0.02). TIPS shunt occlusion was identified in patients by a significant reduction in the scintigraphically measured portal venons contribution to hepatic blood flow. Hepatic perfusion scintigraphy appears to be a valuable method to determine the immediate effect of TIPS on hepatic blood flow. Post-TIPS follow-up studies of hepatic haemodynamics by liver perfusion scintigraphy appear able to contribute to the detection of TIPS shunt occlusion before the clinical consequences of this complication have become apparent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Leeuwen DJ. Assessment of portal hypertension: understanding will improve treatment.Dig Dis 1991; 9: 92–105.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brewer TG. Treatment of acute gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage.Med Clin North Am 1993; 77: 993–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Navasa M, Garcia Pagan JC, Bosch J, Riera JR, Banares R, Mas A, Bruguera M, Rodes J. Portal hypertension in acute liver failure.Gut 1992; 33: 965–968.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McCormick PA, Jenkins SA, McIntyre N, Burroughs AK. Why portal hypertensive varices bleed and bleed: a hypothesis.Gut 1995; 36: 100–103.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rossle M, Richter GM, Noldge G, Palmaz JC, Wenz W, Gerok W. New non-operative treatment for variceal haemorrhage [letter].Lancet 1989; II: 153.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chong WK, Malisch TA, Mazer MJ, Lind CD, Worrell JA, Richards WO. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: US assessment with maximum flow velocity.Radiology 1993; 189 789–793.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ferral H, Foshager MC, Bjarnason H, Finlay DE, Hunter DW, Castaneda Zuniga WR, Letourneau JG. Early sonographic evaluation of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).ardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1993; 16: 275–279.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Talavera A, Artaza T, Gómez R, Legaz ML, Garciá L. Usefulness of Doppler sonography in monitoring transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.J Clin Ultrasound 1994; 22: 137–140.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dodd GD, Zajko AB, Orons PD, Martin MS, Eichner LS, Santaguida LA. Detection of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt dysfunction: value of duplex Doppler sonography.AJR 1995; 164: 1119–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foshager MC, Ferral H, Nazarian GK, Castaneda Zuniga WR, Letourneau JG. Duplex sonography after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS): normal hemodynamic findings and efficacy in predicting shunt patency and stenosis.AJR 1995; 165: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taplin GV. Dynamic studies of liver function with radioisotopes. In:Dynamic studies wich radioisotopes in medicine. New York: Unipub; 1971: 373–392.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Biersack HJ, Thelen M, Schulz D, Knopp R, Dahlem R, Schmidt R, Winkler C. Die sequentielle Hepatospleno-Szintigraphie zur quantitativen Beurteilung der Leberdurchblutung.Fortschr Röntgenstr 1977; 126: 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Biersack HJ, Torres J, Thelen M, Molon O, Winkler C. Determination of liver and spleen perfusion by quantitative sequential scintigraphy: results in normal subjects and in patients with portal hypertension.Clin Nucl Med 1981; 6: 218–220.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rössle M, Haag K, Ochs A, Sellinger M, Nöldge G, Perarnau J-M, Berger E, Blum U, Gabelmann A, Hauenstein K, Langer M, Gerok W. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt procedure for variceal bleeding.N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 165–171.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Richter GM, Roeren T, Roessle M, Palmaz JC. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt.Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol 1992; 6: 403–419.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Biersack HL. Die quantitative Leberperfusionsszintigraphie.Langenbecks Arch Chir 1980; 351: 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Martin-Comin J, Mora J, Figueras J, Puchal R, Jaurrita E, Badosa F, Ramos M. Calculation of portal contribution to hepatic blood flow with 99m-Tc-microcolloids: a non-invasive method to diagnose liver graft rejection.J Nucl Med 1988; 29: 1776–1780.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Breslow NA. A generalized Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing K samples subject to unequal patterns of censorship.Biometrika 1970; 57: 579–594.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Burn P, Taylor K, Blei AT. Doppler flowmetry and portal hypertension.Gastroenterology 1987; 92: 824–846.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bolondi L, Gaiani S, Barbara L. Accuracy and reproducibility of portal flow measurement by Doppler US.J Hepatol 1991; 13:269–273.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miller J, Diftey BL, Fleming JS. Measurement of colloid clearance rate as an adjunet to static liver imaging.Eur J Nucl Med 1979, 4: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leng B, O'Driscoll MP, Majeed FA, Grime JS, Critchley M. Hepatic perfusion index in cirrhotic livers - investigation of imaging and analytical procedures.Nucl Med Commun 1987; 8:1001–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Viallet A, Marleau D, Huet M, Martin F, Farley A, Villeneuve J-P, Lavoie P. Haemodynamic evaluation of patients with intrahepatic portal hypertension.Gastroenterology 1975; 69: 1297–1300.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Meng HC, Lin HC, Tsai YT, et al. Relationships between the severity of cirrhosis and haemodynamic values in patients with cirrhosis.J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1994; 9: 148–153.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sweeting JG. Tips: good for the liver, but what about the heart?Gastroenterology 1994; 107: 593–594.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wong F, Sniderman K, Liu P, Allidina Y, Sherman M, Blendis L, Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt: effects on hemodynamics and sodium hemeostasis in cirrhosis and refractory ascites.Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 816–822.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rodriguez Laiz JM, Banares R, Echenagusia A, Casado M, Camunez F, Perez Roldan F, de Diego A, Cos E, Clemente G. Effects of transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt (TIPS) on splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics, and hepatic function in patients with portal hypertension. Preliminary results.Dig Dis Sci 1995; 40: 2121–2127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menzel, J., Schober, O., Reimer, P. et al. Scintigraphic evaluation of hepatic blood flow after intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Eur J Nucl Med 24, 635–641 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00841401

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00841401

Key words

Navigation