Skip to main content
Log in

Pressure chamber procedures for leaf water potential measurements of cotton

  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Measurement of leaf water potential (ψ l ) with a pressure chamber is usually regarded as a reliable and practical field technique. However, recent evidence indicates that results depend on the measurement techniques employed. Field experiments were conducted to identify the magnitude and sources of error affecting pressure chamber measurements of ψ l in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and to develop an accurate and operationally flexible procedure. Water potential of bare cotton leaves was about 0.2 MPa less than aluminum foil wrapped leaves when the elapsed time between excision to chamber pressurization was less than 30 s. The water potential of intact leaves increased 0.3 MPa after 15 s of enclosure in aluminum foil. 5 to 30 min of enclosure were sufficient to reach equilibrium between ψ l and water potential within the plant stem. Aluminum foil wrapped leaves maintained their ψ l for 2 h stored in a humid, dark box at 21–28 °C while wet wrapped (cheesecloth) or bare leaf ψ l increased after one hour because of hydration. An accurate and operationally flexible ψ l measurement procedure, suitable for large scale sampling, was defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyer JS (1974) Water transport in plants: Mechanisms of apparent changes in resistance during absorption. Planta 117:187

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce JA (1978) Effects of environment on apparent root resistance to water flow in whole soybean and cotton plants. J Exp Bot 29:595

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes DW, Yamada H (1982) Relation of cotton growth and yield to minimum leaf water potential. Crop Sci 22:134

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach JE, Woodhead T, Day W (1982) Bias in pressure chamber measurements of leaf water potential. Agric Meteorol 27:257

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer WS, Green GC (1981) Plant indicators of wheat and soybean crop water stress. Irrig Sci 2:167

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer WS, Reicosky DC (1985) Enclosing leaves for water potential measurement and its effect on interpreting soil induced water stress. Agric Forest Meteorol 35:18

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliviera EC (1983) Growth and adaptation of cotton in the field under water deficit conditions. PhD Diss, University of California, Davis, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner NC, Long MJ (1980) Errors arising from rapid water loss in the measurement of leaf water potential by the pressure chamber technique. Aust J Plant Physiol 7:527

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner NC (1981) Correction of flow resistance of plants measured from covered and exposed leaves. Plant Physiol 68:1090

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace JS, Clark JA, McGowan M (1983) Water relations of winter wheat. 3. Components of leaf water potential and the soil-plant water potential gradient. J Agric Sci Camb 100:581

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenkert W, Lemon ER, Sinclair TR (1978) Changes in water potential during pressure bomb measurement.Agron J 70:353

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziska LH, Hall AE (1983) Soil and plant measurements for determining when to irrigate cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata L., Walp.) grown under planned water deficits. Irrig Sci 3:247

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution from the USDA-ARS, Water Management Research Laboratory, 2021 S. Peach, Fresno, CA 93727 and the Dept. of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meron, M., Grimes, D.W., Phene, C.J. et al. Pressure chamber procedures for leaf water potential measurements of cotton. Irrig Sci 8, 215–222 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00259382

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00259382

Keywords

Navigation