Summary
Measurement of leaf water potential (ψ l ) with a pressure chamber is usually regarded as a reliable and practical field technique. However, recent evidence indicates that results depend on the measurement techniques employed. Field experiments were conducted to identify the magnitude and sources of error affecting pressure chamber measurements of ψ l in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and to develop an accurate and operationally flexible procedure. Water potential of bare cotton leaves was about 0.2 MPa less than aluminum foil wrapped leaves when the elapsed time between excision to chamber pressurization was less than 30 s. The water potential of intact leaves increased 0.3 MPa after 15 s of enclosure in aluminum foil. 5 to 30 min of enclosure were sufficient to reach equilibrium between ψ l and water potential within the plant stem. Aluminum foil wrapped leaves maintained their ψ l for 2 h stored in a humid, dark box at 21–28 °C while wet wrapped (cheesecloth) or bare leaf ψ l increased after one hour because of hydration. An accurate and operationally flexible ψ l measurement procedure, suitable for large scale sampling, was defined.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boyer JS (1974) Water transport in plants: Mechanisms of apparent changes in resistance during absorption. Planta 117:187
Bunce JA (1978) Effects of environment on apparent root resistance to water flow in whole soybean and cotton plants. J Exp Bot 29:595
Grimes DW, Yamada H (1982) Relation of cotton growth and yield to minimum leaf water potential. Crop Sci 22:134
Leach JE, Woodhead T, Day W (1982) Bias in pressure chamber measurements of leaf water potential. Agric Meteorol 27:257
Meyer WS, Green GC (1981) Plant indicators of wheat and soybean crop water stress. Irrig Sci 2:167
Meyer WS, Reicosky DC (1985) Enclosing leaves for water potential measurement and its effect on interpreting soil induced water stress. Agric Forest Meteorol 35:18
Oliviera EC (1983) Growth and adaptation of cotton in the field under water deficit conditions. PhD Diss, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
Turner NC, Long MJ (1980) Errors arising from rapid water loss in the measurement of leaf water potential by the pressure chamber technique. Aust J Plant Physiol 7:527
Turner NC (1981) Correction of flow resistance of plants measured from covered and exposed leaves. Plant Physiol 68:1090
Wallace JS, Clark JA, McGowan M (1983) Water relations of winter wheat. 3. Components of leaf water potential and the soil-plant water potential gradient. J Agric Sci Camb 100:581
Wenkert W, Lemon ER, Sinclair TR (1978) Changes in water potential during pressure bomb measurement.Agron J 70:353
Ziska LH, Hall AE (1983) Soil and plant measurements for determining when to irrigate cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata L., Walp.) grown under planned water deficits. Irrig Sci 3:247
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Contribution from the USDA-ARS, Water Management Research Laboratory, 2021 S. Peach, Fresno, CA 93727 and the Dept. of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meron, M., Grimes, D.W., Phene, C.J. et al. Pressure chamber procedures for leaf water potential measurements of cotton. Irrig Sci 8, 215–222 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00259382
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00259382